Mixed methods study on the feasibility of implementing periodic continuous glucose monitoring among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus in a primary care setting.

Continuous glucose monitoring Feasibility: focus group interview: person-centered care Type 2 diabetes

Journal

Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 09 08 2023
revised: 05 04 2024
accepted: 09 04 2024
medline: 25 4 2024
pubmed: 25 4 2024
entrez: 25 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Health care professionals (HCPs) play a central role in leveraging technologies to support individuals with diabetes. This mixed-method study was completed to determine the feasibility of implementing periodic continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a primary care setting. This study aimed to evaluate and describe the experiences of using periodic CGM with data visualization tools in patients with type 2 diabetes to foster a person-centered approach in a primary care setting. Fifty outpatients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, and with a disease duration of at least 2 years were included in this study. Data were collected from April 2021 to January 2022. Patients completed a single period of sensor measurements for 28 days and a diabetes questionnaire about feelings and experiences of health care. HbA1c was also measured. A focus group interview was conducted to evaluate and describe the HCPs experiences of using periodic CGM. Patients reported to HCPs that the CGM device was comfortable to wear and noted that LibreView was easy to use when scanning the sensor to obtain and visualize the glucose levels and trends. Data availability of CGM data was >70 %.Clinical observations revealed a mean reduction in HbA The HCPs and participants in this study had a positive experience or viewed the implementation of periodic CGM with data visualization tools as a positive experience and appeared to be feasible for implementation in a primary care setting.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Health care professionals (HCPs) play a central role in leveraging technologies to support individuals with diabetes. This mixed-method study was completed to determine the feasibility of implementing periodic continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in a primary care setting.
Aim UNASSIGNED
This study aimed to evaluate and describe the experiences of using periodic CGM with data visualization tools in patients with type 2 diabetes to foster a person-centered approach in a primary care setting.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Fifty outpatients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, and with a disease duration of at least 2 years were included in this study. Data were collected from April 2021 to January 2022. Patients completed a single period of sensor measurements for 28 days and a diabetes questionnaire about feelings and experiences of health care. HbA1c was also measured. A focus group interview was conducted to evaluate and describe the HCPs experiences of using periodic CGM.
Results UNASSIGNED
Patients reported to HCPs that the CGM device was comfortable to wear and noted that LibreView was easy to use when scanning the sensor to obtain and visualize the glucose levels and trends. Data availability of CGM data was >70 %.Clinical observations revealed a mean reduction in HbA
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
The HCPs and participants in this study had a positive experience or viewed the implementation of periodic CGM with data visualization tools as a positive experience and appeared to be feasible for implementation in a primary care setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38660249
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29498
pii: S2405-8440(24)05529-4
pmc: PMC11041009
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e29498

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Author(s).

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Unn-Britt Johansson (UB)

Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, P.O. Box 5605, SE-114, 86, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, P.O. Box, 5605, SE-114 86, Stockholm, Sweden.

Sissel Andreassen Gleissman (S)

Department of Nursing Science, Sophiahemmet University, P.O. Box 5605, SE-114 86, Stockholm, Sweden.

Maarit Korkeila Liden (M)

Insurance Clinic, Sophiahemmet, P.O. Box 5605, SE-114 86, Stockholm, Sweden.

Marie Wickman (M)

Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, P.O. Box 5605, SE-114, 86, Stockholm, Sweden.

Berit Gustafsson (B)

Insurance Clinic, Sophiahemmet, P.O. Box 5605, SE-114 86, Stockholm, Sweden.

Stefan Sjöberg (S)

Department of Health Promoting Science, Sophiahemmet University, P.O. Box 5605, SE-114, 86, Stockholm, Sweden.
Insurance Clinic, Sophiahemmet, P.O. Box 5605, SE-114 86, Stockholm, Sweden.

Classifications MeSH