Uncovering spatiotemporal dynamics of the corticothalamic network at ictal onset.

GCA coherence ictal corticothalamic change thalamocortical network

Journal

Epilepsia
ISSN: 1528-1167
Titre abrégé: Epilepsia
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2983306R

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Apr 2024
Historique:
revised: 08 04 2024
received: 28 11 2023
accepted: 08 04 2024
medline: 25 4 2024
pubmed: 25 4 2024
entrez: 25 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Although the clinical efficacy of deep brain stimulation targeting the anterior nucleus (AN) and centromedian nucleus (CM) of the thalamus has been actively investigated for the treatment of medication-resistant epilepsy, few studies have investigated dynamic ictal changes in corticothalamic connectivity in human electroencephalographic (EEG) recording. This study aims to establish the complex spatiotemporal dynamics of the ictal corticothalamic network associated with various seizure foci. We analyzed 10 patients (aged 2.7-28.1 years) with medication-resistant focal epilepsy who underwent stereotactic EEG evaluation with thalamic sampling. We examined both undirected and directed connectivity, incorporating coherence and spectral Granger causality analysis (GCA) between the diverse seizure foci and thalamic nuclei (AN and CM) at ictal onset. In our analysis of 36 seizures, coherence between seizure onset and thalamic nuclei increased across all frequencies, especially in slower bands (delta, theta, alpha). GCA showed increased information flow from seizure onset to the thalamus across all frequency bands, but outflows from the thalamus were mainly in slower frequencies, particularly delta. In the subgroup analysis based on various seizure foci, the delta coherence showed a more pronounced increase at CM than at AN during frontal lobe seizures. Conversely, in limbic seizures, the delta coherence increase was greater at AN compared to CM. It appears that the delta frequency plays a pivotal role in modulating the corticothalamic network during seizures. Our results underscore the significance of comprehending the spatiotemporal dynamics of the corticothalamic network at ictal onset, and this knowledge could guide personalized responsive neuromodulation treatment strategies.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38662128
doi: 10.1111/epi.17990
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : NINDS NIH HHS
ID : 1K23NS128318
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2024 International League Against Epilepsy.

Références

Kwan P, Brodie MJ. Early identification of refractory epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2000;342:314–319.
Fisher R, Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, Henry T, Gross R, et al. Electrical stimulation of the anterior nucleus of thalamus for treatment of refractory epilepsy. Epilepsia. 2010;51:899–908.
Morrell MJ. Responsive cortical stimulation for the treatment of medically intractable partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2011;77:1295–1304.
Blumenfeld H, Varghese GI, Purcaro MJ, Motelow JE, Enev M, McNally KA, et al. Cortical and subcortical networks in human secondarily generalized tonic‐clonic seizures. Brain. 2009;132:999–1012.
Keller SS, Richardson MP, Schoene‐Bake JC, O'Muircheartaigh J, Elkommos S, Kreilkamp B, et al. Thalamotemporal alteration and postoperative seizures in temporal lobe epilepsy. Ann Neurol. 2015;77:760–774.
Meeren HK, Pijn JP, Van Luijtelaar EL, Coenen AM, Lopes da Silva FH. Cortical focus drives widespread corticothalamic networks during spontaneous absence seizures in rats. J Neurosci. 2002;22:1480–1495.
Guye M, Régis J, Tamura M, Wendling F, McGonigal A, Chauvel P, et al. The role of corticothalamic coupling in human temporal lobe epilepsy. Brain. 2006;129:1917–1928.
Wu TQ, Kaboodvand N, McGinn RJ, Veit M, Davey Z, Datta A, et al. Multisite thalamic recordings to characterize seizure propagation in the human brain. Brain. 2023;146:2792–2802.
Salanova V, Witt T, Worth R, Henry TR, Gross RE, Nazzaro JM, et al. Long‐term efficacy and safety of thalamic stimulation for drug‐resistant partial epilepsy. Neurology. 2015;84:1017–1025.
Velasco AL, Velasco F, Jiménez F, Velasco M, Castro G, Carrillo‐Ruiz JD, et al. Neuromodulation of the centromedian thalamic nuclei in the treatment of generalized seizures and the improvement of the quality of life in patients with Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome. Epilepsia. 2006;47:1203–1212.
Velasco F, Velasco M, Jimenez F, Velasco AL, Brito F, Rise M, et al. Predictors in the treatment of difficult‐to‐control seizures by electrical stimulation of the centromedian thalamic nucleus. Neurosurgery. 2000;47:295–304; discussion 304–295, 305.
Valentín A, García Navarrete E, Chelvarajah R, Torres C, Navas M, Vico L, et al. Deep brain stimulation of the centromedian thalamic nucleus for the treatment of generalized and frontal epilepsies. Epilepsia. 2013;54:1823–1833.
Burdette DE, Haykal MA, Jarosiewicz B, Fabris RR, Heredia G, Elisevich K, et al. Brain‐responsive corticothalamic stimulation in the centromedian nucleus for the treatment of regional neocortical epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav. 2020;112:107354.
Dalic LJ, Warren AEL, Bulluss KJ, Thevathasan W, Roten A, Churilov L, et al. DBS of thalamic Centromedian nucleus for Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome (ESTEL trial). Ann Neurol. 2022;91:253–267.
Pizzo F, Roehri N, Giusiano B, Lagarde S, Carron R, Scavarda D, et al. The ictal signature of thalamus and basal ganglia in focal epilepsy: a SEEG study. Neurology. 2021;96:e280–e293.
Edmonds B, Miyakoshi M, Gianmaria Remore L, Ahn S, Westley Phillips H, Daida A, et al. Characteristics of ictal thalamic EEG in pediatric‐onset neocortical focal epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2023;154:116–125.
Beaudreault CP, Muh CR, Naftchi A, Spirollari E, das A, Vazquez S, et al. Responsive Neurostimulation targeting the anterior, Centromedian and Pulvinar thalamic nuclei and the detection of electrographic seizures in pediatric and young adult patients. Front Hum Neurosci. 2022;16:876204.
Soulier H, Pizzo F, Jegou A, Lagarde S, Garnier E, Makhalova J, et al. The anterior and pulvinar thalamic nuclei interactions in mesial temporal lobe seizure networks. Clin Neurophysiol. 2023;150:176–183.
Ilyas A, Toth E, Chaitanya G, Riley K, Pati S. Ictal high‐frequency activity in limbic thalamic nuclei varies with electrographic seizure‐onset patterns in temporal lobe epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2022;137:183–192.
Fisher RS, Cross JH, French JA, Higurashi N, Hirsch E, Jansen FE, et al. Operational classification of seizure types by the international league against epilepsy: position paper of the ILAE Commission for Classification and Terminology. Epilepsia. 2017;58:522–530.
Fischl B. FreeSurfer. Neuroimage. 2012;62:774–781.
Tadel F, Baillet S, Mosher JC, Pantazis D, Leahy RM. Brainstorm: a user‐friendly application for MEG/EEG analysis. Comput Intell Neurosci. 2011;2011:879716.
Zhang Y, Chung H, Ngo JP, Monsoor T, Hussain SA, Matsumoto JH, et al. Characterizing physiological high‐frequency oscillations using deep learning. J Neural Eng. 2022;19:066027.
Klein A, Tourville J. 101 labeled brain images and a consistent human cortical labeling protocol. Front Neurosci. 2012;6:171.
Gramfort A, Luessi M, Larson E, Engemann DA, Strohmeier D, Brodbeck C, et al. MEG and EEG data analysis with MNE‐python. Front Neurosci. 2013;7:267.
Bastos AM, Schoffelen JM. A tutorial review of functional connectivity analysis Methods and their interpretational pitfalls. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:175.
Seth AK, Barrett AB, Barnett L. Granger causality analysis in neuroscience and neuroimaging. J Neurosci. 2015;35:3293–3297.
Barrett AB, Murphy M, Bruno MA, Noirhomme Q, Boly M, Laureys S, et al. Granger causality analysis of steady‐state electroencephalographic signals during propofol‐induced anaesthesia. PLoS One. 2012;7:e29072.
Geweke J. Measurement of linear dependence and feedback between multiple time series. J Am Stat Assoc. 1982;77:304–313.
Combrisson E, Nest T, Brovelli A, Ince RAA, Soto JLP, Guillot A, et al. Tensorpac: an open‐source python toolbox for tensor‐based phase‐amplitude coupling measurement in electrophysiological brain signals. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020;16:e1008302.
Tort AB, Komorowski R, Eichenbaum H, Kopell N. Measuring phase‐amplitude coupling between neuronal oscillations of different frequencies. J Neurophysiol. 2010;104:1195–1210.
Canolty RT, Edwards E, Dalal SS, Soltani M, Nagarajan SS, Kirsch HE, et al. High gamma power is phase‐locked to theta oscillations in human neocortex. Science. 2006;313:1626–1628.
Ikeda A, Taki W, Kunieda T, Terada K, Mikuni N, Nagamine T, et al. Focal ictal direct current shifts in human epilepsy as studied by subdural and scalp recording. Brain. 1999;122(Pt 5):827–838.
Kanazawa K, Matsumoto R, Imamura H, Matsuhashi M, Kikuchi T, Kunieda T, et al. Intracranially recorded ictal direct current shifts may precede high frequency oscillations in human epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2015;126:47–59.
Blumenfeld H, McCormick DA. Corticothalamic inputs control the pattern of activity generated in thalamocortical networks. J Neurosci. 2000;20:5153–5162.
Blumenfeld H. Cellular and network mechanisms of spike‐wave seizures. Epilepsia. 2005;46(Suppl 9):21–33.
Motelow JE, Li W, Zhan Q, Mishra AM, Sachdev RNS, Liu G, et al. Decreased subcortical cholinergic arousal in focal seizures. Neuron. 2015;85:561–572.
Nariai H, Matsuzaki N, Juhasz C, Nagasawa T, Sood S, Chugani HT, et al. Ictal high‐frequency oscillations at 80‐200 Hz coupled with delta phase in epileptic spasms. Epilepsia. 2011;52:e130–e134.
Zhang D, Snyder AZ, Shimony JS, Fox MD, Raichle ME. Noninvasive functional and structural connectivity mapping of the human thalamocortical system. Cereb Cortex. 2010;20:1187–1194.
Kundishora AJ, Gummadavelli A, Ma C, Liu M, McCafferty C, Schiff ND, et al. Restoring conscious arousal during focal limbic seizures with deep brain stimulation. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27:1964–1975.
Yu T, Wang X, Li Y, Zhang G, Worrell G, Chauvel P, et al. High‐frequency stimulation of anterior nucleus of thalamus desynchronizes epileptic network in humans. Brain. 2018;141:2631–2643.
Warren AEL, Dalic LJ, Bulluss KJ, BAppSci AR, Thevathasan W, Archer JS. The optimal target and connectivity for deep brain stimulation in Lennox‐Gastaut syndrome. Ann Neurol. 2022;92:61–74.
Deutschová B, Pizzo F, Giusiano B, Villalon SM, Carron R, Bénar C, et al. Ictal connectivity changes induced by pulvinar stimulation correlate with improvement of awareness. Brain Stimul. 2021;14:344–346.
Barnett L, Seth AK. The MVGC multivariate granger causality toolbox: a new approach to granger‐causal inference. J Neurosci Methods. 2014;223:50–68.
Barnett L, Seth AK. Behaviour of granger causality under filtering: theoretical invariance and practical application. J Neurosci Methods. 2011;201:404–419.
Ding M, Bressler SL, Yang W, Liang H. Short‐window spectral analysis of cortical event‐related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biol Cybern. 2000;83:35–45.
Hu S, Jia X, Zhang J, Kong W, Cao Y. Shortcomings/limitations of Blockwise granger causality and advances of Blockwise new causality. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2016;27:2588–2601.
Biswas A, Ombao H. Frequency‐specific non‐linear granger causality in a network of brain signals. IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP). Singapore: IEEE; 2022.
Wendling F, Bartolomei F, Bellanger JJ, Chauvel P. Interpretation of interdependencies in epileptic signals using a macroscopic physiological model of the EEG. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112:1201–1218.
Iglesias JE, Insausti R, Lerma‐Usabiaga G, Bocchetta M, van Leemput K, Greve DN, et al. A probabilistic atlas of the human thalamic nuclei combining ex vivo MRI and histology. NeuroImage. 2018;183:314–326.

Auteurs

Saarang Panchavati (S)

Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Atsuro Daida (A)

Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Benjamin Edmonds (B)

Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Makoto Miyakoshi (M)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.

Shingo Oana (S)

Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Samuel S Ahn (SS)

Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Corey Arnold (C)

Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Noriko Salamon (N)

Department of Radiology, UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Raman Sankar (R)

Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
UCLA Children's Discovery and Innovation Institute, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Aria Fallah (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

William Speier (W)

Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Hiroki Nariai (H)

Division of Pediatric Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, UCLA Mattel Children's Hospital, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Department of Radiology, UCLA Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Classifications MeSH