A comprehensive stroke risk assessment by combining atrial computational fluid dynamics simulations and functional patient data.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
25 04 2024
25 04 2024
Historique:
received:
26
01
2024
accepted:
17
04
2024
medline:
26
4
2024
pubmed:
26
4
2024
entrez:
25
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Stroke, a major global health concern often rooted in cardiac dynamics, demands precise risk evaluation for targeted intervention. Current risk models, like the
Identifiants
pubmed: 38664464
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59997-2
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-59997-2
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9515Subventions
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : T32 HL007024
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM119998
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Dritsas, E. & Trigka, M. Stroke risk prediction with machine learning techniques. Sensors 22, 4670 (2022).
pubmed: 35808172
pmcid: 9268898
doi: 10.3390/s22134670
Hankey, G. J. Potential new risk factors for ischemic stroke: What is their potential?. Stroke 37, 2181–2188 (2006).
pubmed: 16809576
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000229883.72010.e4
Johansen, M. C., Doria de Vasconcellos, H., Nazarian, S., Lima, J. A. & Gottesman, R. F. The investigation of left atrial structure and stroke etiology: The I-LASER study. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 10, e018766 (2021).
Benjamin, E. J., D’Agostino, R. B., Belanger, A. J., Wolf, P. A. & Levy, D. Left atrial size and the risk of stroke and death: The framingham heart study. Circulation 92, 835–841 (1995).
pubmed: 7641364
doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.92.4.835
Lee, J. M. et al. Why is left atrial appendage morphology related to strokes? an analysis of the flow velocity and orifice size of the left atrial appendage. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 26, 922–927 (2015).
pubmed: 25959871
doi: 10.1111/jce.12710
Bieging, E. T. et al. Statistical shape analysis of the left atrial appendage predicts stroke in atrial fibrillation. Int. J. Cardiovasc. Imaging 37, 2521–2527 (2021).
pubmed: 33956285
pmcid: 8316337
doi: 10.1007/s10554-021-02262-8
Burrell, L. D., Horne, B. D., Anderson, J. L., Muhlestein, J. B. & Whisenant, B. K. Usefulness of left atrial appendage volume as a predictor of embolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 112, 1148–1152 (2013).
pubmed: 23827402
doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.05.062
Impact and implications for rehabilitation. Roth, E. J. Heart disease in patients with stroke. part ii. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 75, 94–101 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90344-1
Ergul, A., Hafez, S., Fouda, A. & Fagan, S. C. Impact of comorbidities on acute injury and recovery in preclinical stroke research: Focus on hypertension and diabetes. Transl. Stroke Res. 7, 248–260 (2016).
pubmed: 27026092
pmcid: 4929031
doi: 10.1007/s12975-016-0464-8
Cipolla, M. J., Liebeskind, D. S. & Chan, S.-L. The importance of comorbidities in ischemic stroke: Impact of hypertension on the cerebral circulation. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 38, 2129–2149 (2018).
pubmed: 30198826
pmcid: 6282213
doi: 10.1177/0271678X18800589
Harb, S. et al. Effect of anticoagulation on mortality by chadsvasc score in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison to patients without atrial fibrillation. Eur. Heart J. 39, 1075–1075 (Oxford University Press, 2018).
January, C. T. et al. 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the heart rhythm society in collaboration with the society of thoracic surgeons. Circulation 140, e125–e151 (2019).
pubmed: 30686041
doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000665
Steiner, T., Rosand, J. & Diringer, M. Intracerebral hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulant therapy: Current practices and unresolved questions. Stroke 37, 256–262 (2006).
pubmed: 16339459
doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000196989.09900.f8
Chen, L. Y. et al. CHA2DS2-VASc score and stroke prediction in atrial fibrillation in whites, blacks, and hispanics. Stroke 50, 28–33 (2019).
pubmed: 30580712
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021453
Zhang, J. et al. The interpretation of CHA2DS2-VASc score components in clinical practice: A joint survey by the European heart rhythm association (EHRA) scientific initiatives committee, the EHRA young electrophysiologists, the association of cardiovascular nursing and allied professionals, and the European society of cardiology council on stroke. EP Europace 23, 314–322 (2021).
doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa358
Sun, Y. et al. Finding low CHA2DS2-VASc scores unreliable? why not give morphological and hemodynamic methods a try?. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 9, 1032736 (2023).
pubmed: 36684565
pmcid: 9846026
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1032736
Lodziński, P. et al. Trends in antithrombotic management of patients with atrial fibrillation: A report from the polish part of the eurobservational research programme-atrial fibrillation general long-term registry. Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 130, 196–205 (2020).
Goldstein, L. B. et al. Guidelines for the primary prevention of stroke: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American heart association/American stroke association. Stroke 42, 517–584 (2011).
pubmed: 21127304
doi: 10.1161/STR.0b013e3181fcb238
Kirchhof, P. et al. Anticoagulation with edoxaban in patients with atrial high-rate episodes. N. Engl. J. Med. 389, 1167–1179 (2023).
pubmed: 37622677
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2303062
Wang, Y. et al. Numerical prediction of thrombosis risk in left atrium under atrial fibrillation. Math. Biosci. Eng. 17, 2348–2360 (2020).
pubmed: 32233539
doi: 10.3934/mbe.2020125
Corti, M., Zingaro, A., Dede’, L. & Quarteroni, A. M. Impact of atrial fibrillation on left atrium haemodynamics: A computational fluid dynamics study. Comput. Biol. Med. 150, 106143 (2022).
pubmed: 36182758
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2022.106143
Dueñas-Pamplona, J., Sierra-Pallares, J., García, J., Castro, F. & Munoz-Paniagua, J. Boundary-condition analysis of an idealized left atrium model. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 49, 1507–1520 (2021).
pubmed: 33403454
doi: 10.1007/s10439-020-02702-x
Mill, J. et al. Patient-specific flow simulation analysis to predict device-related thrombosis in left atrial appendage occluders. REC Intervent. Cardiol. 3(4), 278–285 (2021).
Aguado, A. M. et al. In silico optimization of left atrial appendage occluder implantation using interactive and modeling tools. Front. Physiol. 237 (2019).
Mill, J. et al. Sensitivity analysis of in silico fluid simulations to predict thrombus formation after left atrial appendage occlusion. Mathematics 9, 2304 (2021).
doi: 10.3390/math9182304
García-Villalba, M. et al. Demonstration of patient-specific simulations to assess left atrial appendage thrombogenesis risk. Front. Physiol. 12, 596596 (2021).
pubmed: 33716763
pmcid: 7953154
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.596596
Masci, A. et al. A proof of concept for computational fluid dynamic analysis of the left atrium in atrial fibrillation on a patient-specific basis. J. Biomech. Eng. 142, 011002 (2020).
pubmed: 31513697
doi: 10.1115/1.4044583
Zingaro, A. et al. Po-01-210 stroke risk is identified by slow blood flow and stagnant blood particles in the left atrium. Heart Rhythm 20, S161–S162 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.528
Paliwal, N. et al. Presence of left atrial fibrosis may contribute to aberrant hemodynamics and increased risk of stroke in atrial fibrillation patients. Front. Physiol. 684 (2021).
Durán, E. et al. Pulmonary vein flow split effects in patient-specific simulations of left atrial flow. Comput. Biol. Med. 107128 (2023).
Gonzalo, A. et al. Non-newtonian blood rheology impacts left atrial stasis in patient-specific simulations. Int. J. Num. Methods Biomed. Eng. 38, e3597 (2022).
doi: 10.1002/cnm.3597
Morales Ferez, X. et al. Deep learning framework for real-time estimation of in-silico thrombotic risk indices in the left atrial appendage. Front. Physiol. 12, 694945 (2021).
pubmed: 34262482
pmcid: 8274486
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.694945
Mill, J. et al. The role of the pulmonary veins on left atrial flow patterns and thrombus formation. Sci. Rep. 14, 5860 (2024).
pubmed: 38467726
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-56658-2
Paliwal, N. et al. Slow blood-flow in the left atrial appendage is associated with stroke in atrial fibrillation patients. Heliyon (2024).
García-Isla, G. et al. Sensitivity analysis of geometrical parameters to study haemodynamics and thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage. Int. J. Num. Methods Biomed. Eng. 34, e3100 (2018).
doi: 10.1002/cnm.3100
Bosi, G. M. et al. Computational fluid dynamic analysis of the left atrial appendage to predict thrombosis risk. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 5, 34 (2018).
pubmed: 29670888
pmcid: 5893811
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2018.00034
Pons, M. I. et al. Joint analysis of morphological parameters and in silico haemodynamics of the left atrial appendage for thrombogenic risk assessment. J. Intervent. Cardiol. 2022 (2022).
Wang, L., Wang, Z., Fang, R. & Li, Z.-Y. Evaluation of stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation using morphological and hemodynamic characteristics. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 9, 842364 (2022).
pubmed: 35571199
pmcid: 9098797
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.842364
Sanatkhani, S. et al. Subject-specific factors affecting particle residence time distribution of left atrial appendage in atrial fibrillation: A computational model-based study. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 10, 1070498 (2023).
pubmed: 36993996
pmcid: 10040531
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1070498
Valvez, S., Oliveira-Santos, M., Piedade, A. P., Gonçalves, L. & Amaro, A. M. Computational flow dynamic analysis in left atrial appendage thrombus formation risk: A review. Appl. Sci. 13, 8201 (2023).
doi: 10.3390/app13148201
Qureshi, A. et al. Mechanistic modelling of virchows triad to assess thrombogenicity and stroke risk in atrial fibrillation patients. Eur. Heart J. Digit. Health 3, ztac076–2788 (2022).
Dueñas-Pamplona, J. et al. Reduced-order models of endocardial shear stress patterns in the left atrial appendage from a data-augmented patient-specific database. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.05443 (2023).
Vella, D., Monteleone, A., Musotto, G., Bosi, G. M. & Burriesci, G. Effect of the alterations in contractility and morphology produced by atrial fibrillation on the thrombosis potential of the left atrial appendage. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 9, 586041 (2021).
pubmed: 33718333
pmcid: 7952649
doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.586041
Chen, S.-A. et al. Right atrial focal atrial fibrillation: electrophysiologic characteristics and radiofrequency catheter ablation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 10, 328–335 (1999).
pubmed: 10210494
doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.1999.tb00679.x
Musotto, G. et al. The role of patient-specific morphological features of the left atrial appendage on the thromboembolic risk under atrial fibrillation. Front. Cardiovas. Med. 9, 894187 (2022).
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.894187
Masci, A. et al. The impact of left atrium appendage morphology on stroke risk assessment in atrial fibrillation: A computational fluid dynamics study. Front. Physiol. 9, 1938 (2019).
pubmed: 30723422
pmcid: 6349592
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01938
Zingaro, A. et al. A geometric multiscale model for the numerical simulation of blood flow in the human left heart. Disc. Contin. Dyn. Syst. 15, 2391–2427 (2022).
doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022052
Otani, T. et al. A computational framework for personalized blood flow analysis in the human left atrium. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 44, 3284–3294 (2016).
pubmed: 26968855
doi: 10.1007/s10439-016-1590-x
Qureshi, A. et al. Modelling blood flow and biochemical reactions underlying thrombogenesis in atrial fibrillation. In International Conference on Functional Imaging and Modeling of the Heart, 435–444 (Springer, 2023).
Dueñas-Pamplona, J. et al. A comprehensive comparison of various patient-specific cfd models of the left atrium for atrial fibrillation patients. Comput. Biol. Med. 133, 104423 (2021).
pubmed: 33957460
doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104423
Markl, M. et al. Left atrial 4D flow MRI: Stasis and velocity mapping in patients with atrial fibrillation. Invest. Radiol. 51, 147 (2016).
pubmed: 26488375
pmcid: 4742429
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000219
Domanin, M. et al. Computational fluid-dynamic analysis after carotid endarterectomy: Patch graft versus direct suture closure. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 44, 325–335 (2017).
pubmed: 28479438
doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2017.04.016
Zingaro, A., Dede’, L., Menghini, F. & Quarteroni, A. Hemodynamics of the heart’s left atrium based on a variational multiscale-LES numerical method. Eur. J. Mech. B/Fluids 89, 380–400 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2021.06.014
Di Achille, P., Tellides, G., Figueroa, C. & Humphrey, J. A haemodynamic predictor of intraluminal thrombus formation in abdominal aortic aneurysms. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 470, 20140163 (2014).
Lupo, A., Mokhov, I., Dostoglou, S., Kunz, A. & Burkhardt, J. Assessment of the impact of the planetary scale on the decay of blocking and the use of phase diagrams and enstrophy as a diagnostic. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 43, 45–51 (2007).
doi: 10.1134/S0001433807010057
Umeki, M. Numerical simulation of plane poiseuille turbulence. Fluid Dyn. Res. 13, 67 (1994).
doi: 10.1016/0169-5983(94)90007-8
St Pierre, S. R., Peirlinck, M. & Kuhl, E. Sex matters: A comprehensive comparison of female and male hearts. Front. Physiol. 13, 831179 (2022).
pubmed: 35392369
pmcid: 8980481
doi: 10.3389/fphys.2022.831179
Gonzalez-Martin, P. et al. Ventricular anatomical complexity and sex differences impact predictions from electrophysiological computational models. PLoS ONE 18, e0263639 (2023).
pubmed: 36780442
pmcid: 9925004
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263639
Aguado-Sierra, J. et al. Virtual clinical qt exposure-response studies—a translational computational approach. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 107498 (2024).
Morris, A., Kholmovski, E., Marrouche, N., Cates, J. & Elhabian, S. An image-based approach for 3D left atrium functional measurements. In 2020 Computing in Cardiology, 1–4 (IEEE, 2020).
Yushkevich, P. A. et al. User-guided 3D active contour segmentation of anatomical structures: Significantly improved efficiency and reliability. Neuroimage 31, 1116–1128 (2006).
pubmed: 16545965
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.015
itk snap. http://www.itksnap.org/ .
LLC, M. Pvpython and pvbatch. https://www.paraview.org/Wiki/PvPython_and_PvBatch .
Antiga, L. et al. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med. Biol. Eng. Comput. 46, 1097–1112 (2008).
pubmed: 19002516
doi: 10.1007/s11517-008-0420-1
Fedele, M. & Quarteroni, A. M. Polygonal surface processing and mesh generation tools for numerical simulations of the complete cardiac function. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 37, e3435 (2021).
doi: 10.1002/cnm.3435
Donea, J., Giuliani, S. & Halleux, J.-P. An arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian finite element method for transient dynamic fluid-structure interactions. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 33, 689–723 (1982).
doi: 10.1016/0045-7825(82)90128-1
De Boor, C. A practical guide to splines Vol. 27 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1978).
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-6333-3
Zingaro, A. et al. An electromechanics-driven fluid dynamics model for the simulation of the whole human heart. J. Comput. Phys. 112885 (2024).
Jasak, H. & Tukovic, Z. Automatic mesh motion for the unstructured finite volume method. Trans. FAMENA 30, 1–20 (2006).
Zingaro, A., Bucelli, M., Fumagalli, I., Dede’, L. & Quarteroni, A. Modeling isovolumetric phases in cardiac flows by an augmented resistive immersed implicit surface method. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. e3767 (2022).
Ferng, A. Pulmonary arteries and veins. https://www.kenhub.com/en/library/anatomy/pulmonary-arteries-and-veins (2023).
Fowler, N. O. Cardiac Diagnosis and Treatment (JB Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1976).
Bertoglio, C. & Caiazzo, A. A tangential regularization method for backflow stabilization in hemodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 261, 162–171 (2014).
doi: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.12.057
Moghadam, M. E., Bazilevs, Y., Hsia, T.-Y., Vignon-Clementel, I. E. & Marsden, A. L. A comparison of outlet boundary treatments for prevention of backflow divergence with relevance to blood flow simulations. Comput. Mech. 48, 277–291 (2011).
doi: 10.1007/s00466-011-0599-0
Forti, D. & Dedè, L. Semi-implicit BDF time discretization of the Navier-Stokes equations with VMS-LES modeling in a high performance computing framework. Comput. Fluids 117, 168–182 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2015.05.011
Africa, P. C. lifex: A flexible, high performance library for the numerical solution of complex finite element problems. SoftwareX 20, 101252 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2022.101252
Arndt, D. et al. The deal.II library, version 9.3. J. Numer. Math.29 (2021).
Arndt, D. et al. The deal.II finite element library: design, features, and insights. Comput. Math. Appl. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2020.02.022 (2020).
Official deal.ii website. https://www.dealii.org/ .
Africa, P. C. et al. lifex-cfd: An open-source computational fluid dynamics solver for cardiovascular applications. Comput. Phys. Commun. 109039 (2023).
Africa, P. C., Fumagalli, I., Bucelli, M. & Zingaro, A. lifex-cfd: an open-source computational fluid dynamics solver for cardiovascular applications. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7852089 ,
Koizumi, R. et al. Numerical analysis of hemodynamic changes in the left atrium due to atrial fibrillation. J. Biomech. 48, 472–478 (2015).
pubmed: 25547024
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.12.025
Ku, D. N., Giddens, D. P., Zarins, C. K. & Glagov, S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation: positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis. Off. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 5, 293–302 (1985).
Himburg, H. A. et al. Spatial comparison between wall shear stress measures and porcine arterial endothelial permeability. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 286, H1916–H1922 (2004).
pubmed: 14715506
doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00897.2003