Conservative management of proximal hamstring avulsion: A clinical study.

Hamstring Ischiocrural Isokinetic force Management

Journal

Journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0972-978X
Titre abrégé: J Orthop
Pays: India
ID NLM: 101233220

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Sep 2024
Historique:
received: 31 12 2023
revised: 24 03 2024
accepted: 26 03 2024
pmc-release: 01 09 2025
medline: 26 4 2024
pubmed: 26 4 2024
entrez: 26 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The management of proximal hamstring tear (PHT) is debated and consensus regarding recommended measures and individual treatment regimens is lacking. The present investigation evaluated the efficacy of a conservative management of partial and complete PHT. The present observational study was conducted following the STROBE statement. In June 2018 the medical databases of the BG Klinikum Bergmannstrost Halle, Germany were accessed. All the patients with PHT were retrieved. The outcomes of interest were to evaluate the clinical examination, PROMs, imaging, and isokinetic muscle strength at the baseline and last follow-up. 31 patients were enrolled in the present study. Nine patients (29 % (9 of 31) described local pain at the ischial tuberosity in sitting situations and also in manual palpation. A persistent gap in the tendon string beneath the tuberosity in manual palpation was reported in 25.8 % (8 of 31). The mean VAS at the last follow-up was 2.3 ± 2.3. The mean LEFS score was 50.9 ± 18.8.Control MRI at follow-up showed scarring restitution in the proximal tendon in all patients in the partial tear group. In the complete tear group, a persisting defect state of the proximal tendon course was found in 45 % (9 of 20). The injured side achieved 81.5 ± 22.2 % of the force of the uninjured side, measured in the flexion movement at 60°/s. At an angular velocity of 240°/s, 83.2 ± 26.3 % of the force of the uninjured side was achieved. According to the main findings of the present study, conservative therapy of PTH tears is associated with good clinical outcomes. High-quality investigations are required to establish the proper therapeutic algorithm and advantages of conservative management compared to a surgical approach. Level III.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38665987
doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.03.032
pii: S0972-978X(24)00118-1
pmc: PMC11039336
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

74-79

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Thomas Mendel (T)

BG Hospital Bergmannstrost Halle, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Halle, Germany.
University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Department of Trauma Surgery, Halle, Germany.

Mark Steinke (M)

BG Hospital Bergmannstrost Halle, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Halle, Germany.

Philipp Schenk (P)

BG Hospital Bergmannstrost Halle, Research Executive Department, Halle, Germany.

Filippo Migliorini (F)

Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Academic Hospital of Bolzano (SABES-ASDAA), Teaching Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, 39100 Bolzano, Italy.

Vincent Schütte (V)

Gesundheitszentrum Halle-Neustadt, Center Orthopaedic Surgery, Halle, Germany.

André Reisberg (A)

BG Hospital Bergmannstrost Halle, Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Halle, Germany.

Philipp Kobbe (P)

BG Hospital Bergmannstrost Halle, Department of Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, Halle, Germany.
University Hospital Halle, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Department of Trauma Surgery, Halle, Germany.

Markus Heinecke (M)

Waldkliniken Eisenberg, Orthopaedic Professorship of the University Hospital Jena, Orthopaedic Department, Eisenberg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH