Simulation of acquisition shifts in T2 weighted fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance images to stress test artificial intelligence segmentation networks.
T2w fluid attenuated inversion recovery
artificial intelligence validation
magnetic resonance image simulation
magnetic resonance imaging sequence
multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation
Journal
Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)
ISSN: 2329-4302
Titre abrégé: J Med Imaging (Bellingham)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101643461
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2024
Mar 2024
Historique:
received:
10
08
2023
revised:
01
03
2024
accepted:
29
03
2024
pmc-release:
24
04
2025
medline:
26
4
2024
pubmed:
26
4
2024
entrez:
26
4
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To provide a simulation framework for routine neuroimaging test data, which allows for "stress testing" of deep segmentation networks against acquisition shifts that commonly occur in clinical practice for T2 weighted (T2w) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery magnetic resonance imaging protocols. The approach simulates "acquisition shift derivatives" of MR images based on MR signal equations. Experiments comprise the validation of the simulated images by real MR scans and example stress tests on state-of-the-art multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation networks to explore a generic model function to describe the F1 score in dependence of the contrast-affecting sequence parameters echo time (TE) and inversion time (TI). The differences between real and simulated images range up to 19% in gray and white matter for extreme parameter settings. For the segmentation networks under test, the F1 score dependency on TE and TI can be well described by quadratic model functions ( We show that these deviations are in the range of values as may be caused by erroneous or individual differences in relaxation times as described by literature. The coefficients of the F1 model function allow for a quantitative comparison of the influences of TE and TI. Limitations arise mainly from tissues with a low baseline signal (like cerebrospinal fluid) and when the protocol contains contrast-affecting measures that cannot be modeled due to missing information in the DICOM header.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38666039
doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.2.024013
pii: 23231GR
pmc: PMC11042016
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
024013Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors.