Comparative analysis of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a prospective study on surgical team and operating room personnel satisfaction.
Anesthesia
Kidney
Percutaneous
Stone
Journal
World journal of urology
ISSN: 1433-8726
Titre abrégé: World J Urol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8307716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Apr 2024
26 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
12
11
2023
accepted:
05
04
2024
medline:
26
4
2024
pubmed:
26
4
2024
entrez:
26
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
We aimed to investigate the efficacy and complications of combined spinalepidural anesthesia and general anesthesia in percutaneous stone surgery prospectively. The study prospectively included patients who underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy with general anesthesia (Group.1) or combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (Group.2) at the Department of Urology, Training and Research Hospital, Karabuk University. between December 2018 and December 2019. The effect of the anesthesia technique on the comfort and satisfaction of the operating room personnel, surgeon and anesthesia team were prospectively evaluated and recorded. During the postoperative period, the spinal anesthesia group had a significantly lower visual analog score than the general anesthesia group. No patient in either group required narcotic analgesics during the postoperative period. In terms of overall satisfaction scores, the surgeon performing the surgical procedure had a significantly higher satisfaction score in the general anesthesia group than in the CSEA group. The score was considered good in the general anesthesia group and moderate in the CSEA group. Personnel satisfaction was higher in the patient group that underwent CSEA. In the general anesthesia group, the score was considered to be average. In the CSEA group, the satisfaction score was considered good, with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.05). The anesthesia team's satisfaction score was moderate, with no significant difference between the CSEA and general anesthesia groups (p > 0.05). PCNL under CSEA can be performed safely in certain individuals. Different anesthetic techniques may have varied levels of satisfaction among the surgical team.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38668757
doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-04977-4
pii: 10.1007/s00345-024-04977-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Comparative Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
262Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Wong MY (1998) Evolving technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in a developing country: Singapore General Hospital experience. J Endourol 12(5):397–401
doi: 10.1089/end.1998.12.397
pubmed: 9847058
Hu H, Qin B, He D, Lu Y, Zhao Z, Zhang J et al (2015) Regional versus General Anesthesia for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: A Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 10(5):e0126587
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0126587
pubmed: 25961831
pmcid: 4427359
Gravenstein D (2000) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Anesthesiol Clin North America 18(4):953–971
doi: 10.1016/S0889-8537(05)70203-0
pubmed: 11094699
Kuzgunbay B, Turunc T, Akin S, Ergenoglu P, Aribogan A, Ozkardes H (2009) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. J Endourol 23(11):1835–1838
doi: 10.1089/end.2009.0261
pubmed: 19630480
McLain RF, Kalfas I, Bell GR, Tetzlaff JE, Yoon HJ, Rana M (2005) Comparison of spinal and general anesthesia in lumbar laminectomy surgery: a case-controlled analysis of 400 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 2(1):17–22
doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.1.0017
pubmed: 15658121
Singh V, Sinha RJ, Sankhwar SN, Malik A (2011) A prospective randomized study comparing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia with percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anesthesia. Urol Int 87(3):293–298
doi: 10.1159/000329796
pubmed: 21921573
Rozentsveig V, Neulander EZ, Roussabrov E, Schwartz A, Lismer L, Gurevich B et al (2007) Anesthetic considerations during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Clin Anesth 19(5):351–355
doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2007.02.010
pubmed: 17869985
Trivedi NS, Robalino J, Shevde K (1990) Interpleural block: a new technique for regional anaesthesia during percutaneous nephrostomy and nephrolithotomy. Canad J Anaesth J Canad d’anesthe 37(41):479–481
doi: 10.1007/BF03005632
Barak M, Putilov V, Meretyk S, Halachmi S (2010) ETView tracheoscopic ventilation tube for surveillance after tube position in patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Br J Anaesth 104(4):501–504
doi: 10.1093/bja/aeq024
pubmed: 20185518
Mehrabi S, Karimzadeh SK (2010) Results and complications of spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol J 7(1):22–25
pubmed: 20209451
Pu C, Wang J, Tang Y, Yuan H, Li J, Bai Y et al (2015) The efficacy and safety of percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus regional anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urolithiasis 43(5):455–466
doi: 10.1007/s00240-015-0776-2
pubmed: 25926280
Bajwa SJ, Kaur J, Singh A (2014) A comparative evaluation of epidural and general anaesthetic technique for renal surgeries: A randomised prospective study. Indian J Anaesth 58(4):410–415
doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.138975
pubmed: 25197108
pmcid: 4155285
Movasseghi G, Hassani V, Mohaghegh MR, Safaeian R, Safari S, Zamani MM et al (2014) Comparison between spinal and general anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Anesthesiol Pain Med 4(1):e13871
Liu X, Huang G, Zhong R, Hu S, Deng R (2018) Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Under Regional versus General Anesthesia: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Urol Int 101(2):132–142
doi: 10.1159/000491021
pubmed: 30032149
Barut O, Resim S (2020) Perkütan nefrolitotomi yapılan hastalarda farklı anestezi yöntemlerinin karşılaştırılması. New J Urol 15(1):1–6