The inclusion of companion forages in the diet alongside perennial ryegrass increased dry matter intake and organic matter digestibility in sheep.

Clover Digestibility Grassland Herbage intake Herbs

Journal

Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience
ISSN: 1751-732X
Titre abrégé: Animal
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101303270

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 17 05 2023
revised: 22 03 2024
accepted: 25 03 2024
medline: 26 4 2024
pubmed: 26 4 2024
entrez: 26 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The inclusion of companion forages in the diet of ruminant animals is gaining popularity in temperate regions due to observed improvements in animal performance. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of diet type on DM intake (DMI) and organic matter digestibility (OMD) in sheep. Furthermore, the effect of sward type on diet nutritive quality was investigated. Five dietary treatments were investigated using a 5 × 5 Latin square design experiment: Perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.; PRG) only or PRG plus white clover (Trifolium repens L.;PRG + WC), red clover (Trifolium pratense L.; PRG + RC), chicory (Chicorium intybus L.; PRG + Chic) or plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.; PRG + Plan) at a ratio of 75% PRG and 25% of the respective companion forage and 100% PRG for the grass only treatment on a DM basis. Twenty Belclare castrated male (wether) sheep were housed in metabolism crates across five feeding periods. Individual DMI and faecal output were recorded daily and digestibility parameters were subsequently calculated. Results show that the inclusion of any companion forage increased DMI (kg/day DM) which ranged from 1.55 ± 0.038 (PRG) to 1.76 ± 0.038 (PRG + Chic) (P < 0.001). The PRG + WC (825 ± 1.1), PRG + RC (823 ± 1.1) and PRG + Chic (826 ± 1.1) diets had a greater in vitro OMD (g/kg DM) when compared to PRG (819 ± 1.1) or PRG + Plan (816 ± 1.1) (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the PRG + Chic (830 ± 2.9) diet had a greater in vivo OMD (g/kg DM) (P < 0.01) when compared to the PRG, PRG + RC, and PRG + Plan diets. Regression analysis showed that in vitro estimates moderately reflected in vivo measurements (r

Identifiants

pubmed: 38669749
pii: S1751-7311(24)00081-8
doi: 10.1016/j.animal.2024.101150
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

101150

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

S Woodmartin (S)

Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Mellows Campus, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland; School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

P Creighton (P)

Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Mellows Campus, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland.

T M Boland (TM)

School of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.

L Farrell (L)

DairyNZ, Private Bag 3221, Hamilton 3240, New Zealand.

N Claffey (N)

Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Mellows Campus, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland.

F McGovern (F)

Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Mellows Campus, Athenry, Co. Galway, Ireland. Electronic address: Fiona.McGovern@teagasc.ie.

Classifications MeSH