Effects on gait kinematics, pedobarography, functional and subjective results after isolated chopart injury.
Chopart injury
Fracture
Gait analysis
Midfoot
Pressure distribution
Journal
BMC musculoskeletal disorders
ISSN: 1471-2474
Titre abrégé: BMC Musculoskelet Disord
Pays: England
ID NLM: 100968565
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Apr 2024
26 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
29
08
2023
accepted:
22
04
2024
medline:
27
4
2024
pubmed:
27
4
2024
entrez:
26
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
This study analysed changes in gait and pedobarography and subjective and functional outcomes after isolated Chopart joint injury. The results of 14 patients were reviewed. Kinematic 3D gait analysis, comparative bilateral electromyography (EMG) and pedobarography were performed. On the injured side, the 3D gait analysis showed a significantly increased internal rotation and decreased external rotation of the hip and significantly decreased adduction and decreased range of motion (ROM) for the ankle. On the healthy side, the pedobarography revealed a significantly increased mean force in the forefoot, an increased peak maximum force and an increased maximum pressure in the metatarsal. When standing, significantly more weight was placed on the healthy side. The EMG measurements showed no significant differences between the healthy and injured legs. After isolated Chopart injuries, significant changes in gait and pedobarography can be seen over the long term.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
This study analysed changes in gait and pedobarography and subjective and functional outcomes after isolated Chopart joint injury.
METHODS
METHODS
The results of 14 patients were reviewed. Kinematic 3D gait analysis, comparative bilateral electromyography (EMG) and pedobarography were performed.
RESULTS
RESULTS
On the injured side, the 3D gait analysis showed a significantly increased internal rotation and decreased external rotation of the hip and significantly decreased adduction and decreased range of motion (ROM) for the ankle. On the healthy side, the pedobarography revealed a significantly increased mean force in the forefoot, an increased peak maximum force and an increased maximum pressure in the metatarsal. When standing, significantly more weight was placed on the healthy side. The EMG measurements showed no significant differences between the healthy and injured legs.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
After isolated Chopart injuries, significant changes in gait and pedobarography can be seen over the long term.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38671405
doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07467-1
pii: 10.1186/s12891-024-07467-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
335Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Ponkilainen VT, Laine HJ, Mäenpää HM, Mattila VM, Haapasalo HH. Incidence and characteristics of midfoot injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40:105–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100718799741 .
doi: 10.1177/1071100718799741
pubmed: 30269512
Van Dorp KB, De Vries MR, Van Der Elst M, Schepers T. Chopart joint injury: a study of outcome and morbidity. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2010;49:541–5. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2010.08.005 .
doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.08.005
pubmed: 21035040
Kotter A, Wieberneit J, Braun W, Rüter A. The chopart dislocation. A frequently underestimated injury and its sequelae. A clinical study. Unfallchirurg. 1997;100:737–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001130050185 .
doi: 10.1007/s001130050185
pubmed: 9411801
Rammelt S, Missbach T. Chopart joint injuries: assessment, treatment, and 10-year results. J Orthop Trauma. 2023;37:e14-21. https://doi.org/10.1097/bot.0000000000002465 .
doi: 10.1097/bot.0000000000002465
pubmed: 35976798
Court-Brown CM, Zinna S, Ekrol I. Classification and epidemiology of mid-foot fractures. Foot. 2006;16:138–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foot.2006.03.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2006.03.003
Rammelt S, Schepers T. Chopart injuries: when to fix and when to fuse? Foot Ankle Clin. 2017;22:163–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcl.2016.09.011 .
doi: 10.1016/j.fcl.2016.09.011
pubmed: 28167061
Kutaish H, Stern R, Drittenbass L, Assal M. Injuries to the chopart joint complex: a current review. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2017;27:425–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-017-1958-0 .
doi: 10.1007/s00590-017-1958-0
pubmed: 28417204
Rammelt S, Grass R, Schikore H, Zwipp H. Injuries of the chopart joint. Unfallchirurg. 2002;105:371–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00113-002-0440-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00113-002-0440-5
pubmed: 12066476
Engelmann EWM, Rammelt S, Schepers T. Fractures of the cuboid bone: a critical analysis review. JBJS Rev. 2020;8: e0173. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.rvw.19.00173 .
doi: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.19.00173
pubmed: 32304497
Richter M, Thermann H, Huefner T, Schmidt U, Goesling T, Krettek C. Chopart joint fracture-dislocation: initial open reduction provides better outcome than closed reduction. Foot Ankle Int. 2004;25:340–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070402500512 .
doi: 10.1177/107110070402500512
pubmed: 15134617
Schildhauer TA, Nork SE, Sangeorzan BJ. Temporary bridge plating of the medial column in severe midfoot injuries. J Orthop Trauma. 2003;17:513–20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200308000-00007 .
doi: 10.1097/00005131-200308000-00007
pubmed: 12902790
Main BJ, Jowett RL. Injuries of the midtarsal joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1975;57:89–97. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.57B1.89 .
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.57B1.89
pubmed: 234971
Cibura C, Lülsdorff R, Ramczykowski T, Schildhauer TA, Kruppa C. Introduction of a modified Degan classification to specify treatment algorithms in fractures of the anterior process of the calcaneus. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022;23:942. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-05903-8 .
doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05903-8
pubmed: 36307831
pmcid: 9615330
Hirschmann A, Walter WR, Alaia EF, Garwood E, Amsler F, Rosenberg ZS. Acute fracture of the anterior process of calcaneus: does it herald a more advanced injury to chopart joint? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018;210:1123–30. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.17.18678 .
doi: 10.2214/ajr.17.18678
pubmed: 29570372
Rammelt S, Zwipp H, Schneiders W, Heineck J. Anatomic reconstruction of malunited chopart joint injuries. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2010;36:196–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00068-010-1036-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s00068-010-1036-3
pubmed: 26815862
Klos K, Simons P, Schilling B, Knobe M. Biomechanik des chopart- und lisfranc-gelenkes [Biomechanics of the chopart-and lisfranc joint]. FussSprungg. 2018;16:141–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuspru.2018.07.006 .
doi: 10.1016/j.fuspru.2018.07.006
Rosteius T, Jettkant B, Rausch V, Lotzien S, Königshausen M, Schildhauer TA, et al. Anatomical repair and ligament bracing of Schenck III and IV knee joint dislocations leads to acceptable subjective and kinematic outcomes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021;29:4188–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06501-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06501-2
pubmed: 33688978
pmcid: 8595154
Cibura C, Rosteius T, Brinkemper A, Ull C, Hufnagel S, Jettkant B, Godolias P, Rausch V, Schildhauer TA, Kruppa C. The impact of knee arthrodesis on gait kinematics, muscle activity and patient-reported outcome. Knee. 2023;42:273–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2023.04.006 . (Epub ahead of print).
doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2023.04.006
pubmed: 37119600
Halaki M, Ginn K. Normalization of EMG signals: to normalize or not to normalize and what to normalize to? In: Computational intelligence in electromyography analysis, Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2012.
Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 .
doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002
pubmed: 1593914
Kitaoka HB, Alexander IJ, Adelaar RS, Nunley JA, Myerson MS, Sanders M. Clinical rating systems for the ankle-hindfoot, midfoot, hallux, and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int. 1994;15:349–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110079401500701 .
doi: 10.1177/107110079401500701
pubmed: 7951968
Nauck T, Lohrer H. Translation, cross-cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure for patients with chronic ankle instability. Br J Sports Med. 2011;45:785–90. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsm.2009.067637 .
doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2009.067637
pubmed: 19955163
Farrar JT, Young JP, LaMoreaux L, Werth JL, Poole MR. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain. 2001;94:149–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00349-9 .
doi: 10.1016/s0304-3959(01)00349-9
pubmed: 11690728
Perttunen JR, Nieminen H, Tukiainen E, Kuokkanen H, Asko-Seljavaara S, Komi PV. Asymmetry of gait after free flap reconstruction of severe tibial fractures with extensive soft-tissue damage. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2000;34(3):237–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02844310050159819 .
doi: 10.1080/02844310050159819
pubmed: 11020920
Schmiegel A, Rosenbaum D, Schorat A, Hilker A, Gaubitz M. Assessment of foot impairment in rheumatoid arthritis patients by dynamic pedobarography. Gait Posture. 2008;27(1):110–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.02.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2007.02.008
pubmed: 17419061
Horisberger M, Hintermann B, Valderrabano V. Alterations of plantar pressure distribution in posttraumatic end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2009;24(3):303–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.12.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.12.005
pubmed: 19150745
van Hoeve S, Stollenwerck G, Willems P, Witlox MA, Meijer K, Poeze M. Gait analysis and functional outcome in patients after Lisfranc injury treatment. Foot Ankle Surg. 2018;24(6):535–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2017.07.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.07.003
pubmed: 29409269
Mittlmeier T, Krowiorsch R, Brosinger S, Hudde M. Gait function after fracture-dislocation of the midtarsal and/or tarsometatarsal joints. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 1997;12(3):S16–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0268-0033(97)88330-1 .
doi: 10.1016/s0268-0033(97)88330-1
pubmed: 11415719
Kinner B, Schieder S, Müller F, Pannek A, Roll C. Calcaneocuboid joint involvement in calcaneal fractures. J Trauma. 2010;68:1192–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b28b8c .
doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181b28b8c
pubmed: 20130490
Richter M, Wippermann B, Krettek C, Schratt HE, Hufner T, Therman H. Fractures and fracture dislocations of the midfoot: occurrence, causes and long-term results. Foot Ankle Int. 2001;22:392–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070102200506 .
doi: 10.1177/107110070102200506
pubmed: 11428757
Kösters C, Bockholt S, Müller C, Winter C, Rosenbaum D, Raschke MJ, et al. Comparing the outcomes between chopart, lisfranc and multiple metatarsal shaft fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134:1397–404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-2059-8 .
doi: 10.1007/s00402-014-2059-8
pubmed: 25064509
Maskowitz RW Experimental models of osteoarthritis. In: (Ed^(Eds editor). Osteoarthritis: diagnosis and medical/surgical management, Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Co.; 1992, pp. 213–32.
Cooper A, Chhina H, Howren A, Alvarez C. The contralateral foot in children with unilateral clubfoot, is the unaffected side normal? Gait Posture. 2014;40(3):375–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.05.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2014.05.004
pubmed: 25001577
Favre P, Exner GU, Drerup B, Schmid D, Wetz HH, Jacob HA. The contralateral foot in children with unilateral clubfoot: a study of pressures and forces involved in gait. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007;27(1):54–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/bpo.0b013e31802b7183 .
doi: 10.1097/bpo.0b013e31802b7183
pubmed: 17195799