Using functional principal component analysis (FPCA) to quantify sitting patterns derived from wearable sensors.
Accelerometer
Functional Principal Component Analysis (FPCA)
Multilevel FPCA
Sedentary Behavior (SB)
Journal
The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity
ISSN: 1479-5868
Titre abrégé: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101217089
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Apr 2024
26 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
26
05
2023
accepted:
21
03
2024
medline:
27
4
2024
pubmed:
27
4
2024
entrez:
26
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Sedentary behavior (SB) is a recognized risk factor for many chronic diseases. ActiGraph and activPAL are two commonly used wearable accelerometers in SB research. The former measures body movement and the latter measures body posture. The goal of the current study is to quantify the pattern and variation of movement (by ActiGraph activity counts) during activPAL-identified sitting events, and examine associations between patterns and health-related outcomes, such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP). The current study included 314 overweight postmenopausal women, who were instructed to wear an activPAL (at thigh) and ActiGraph (at waist) simultaneously for 24 hours a day for a week under free-living conditions. ActiGraph and activPAL data were processed to obtain minute-level time-series outputs. Multilevel functional principal component analysis (MFPCA) was applied to minute-level ActiGraph activity counts within activPAL-identified sitting bouts to investigate variation in movement while sitting across subjects and days. The multilevel approach accounted for the nesting of days within subjects. At least 90% of the overall variation of activity counts was explained by two subject-level principal components (PC) and six day-level PCs, hence dramatically reducing the dimensions from the original minute-level scale. The first subject-level PC captured patterns of fluctuation in movement during sitting, whereas the second subject-level PC delineated variation in movement during different lengths of sitting bouts: shorter (< 30 minutes), medium (30 -39 minutes) or longer (> 39 minute). The first subject-level PC scores showed positive association with DBP (standardized In this work we implemented MFPCA to identify variation in movement patterns during sitting bouts, and showed that these patterns were associated with cardiovascular health. Unlike existing methods, MFPCA does not require pre-specified cut-points to define activity intensity, and thus offers a novel powerful statistical tool to elucidate variation in SB patterns and health. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03473145; Registered 22 March 2018; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03473145 ; International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/28684.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Sedentary behavior (SB) is a recognized risk factor for many chronic diseases. ActiGraph and activPAL are two commonly used wearable accelerometers in SB research. The former measures body movement and the latter measures body posture. The goal of the current study is to quantify the pattern and variation of movement (by ActiGraph activity counts) during activPAL-identified sitting events, and examine associations between patterns and health-related outcomes, such as systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP).
METHODS
METHODS
The current study included 314 overweight postmenopausal women, who were instructed to wear an activPAL (at thigh) and ActiGraph (at waist) simultaneously for 24 hours a day for a week under free-living conditions. ActiGraph and activPAL data were processed to obtain minute-level time-series outputs. Multilevel functional principal component analysis (MFPCA) was applied to minute-level ActiGraph activity counts within activPAL-identified sitting bouts to investigate variation in movement while sitting across subjects and days. The multilevel approach accounted for the nesting of days within subjects.
RESULTS
RESULTS
At least 90% of the overall variation of activity counts was explained by two subject-level principal components (PC) and six day-level PCs, hence dramatically reducing the dimensions from the original minute-level scale. The first subject-level PC captured patterns of fluctuation in movement during sitting, whereas the second subject-level PC delineated variation in movement during different lengths of sitting bouts: shorter (< 30 minutes), medium (30 -39 minutes) or longer (> 39 minute). The first subject-level PC scores showed positive association with DBP (standardized
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
In this work we implemented MFPCA to identify variation in movement patterns during sitting bouts, and showed that these patterns were associated with cardiovascular health. Unlike existing methods, MFPCA does not require pre-specified cut-points to define activity intensity, and thus offers a novel powerful statistical tool to elucidate variation in SB patterns and health.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03473145; Registered 22 March 2018; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03473145 ; International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/28684.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38671485
doi: 10.1186/s12966-024-01585-8
pii: 10.1186/s12966-024-01585-8
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03473145']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
48Subventions
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P01AG052352
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIDDK NIH HHS
ID : R01DK114945
Pays : United States
Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : R01HL130483
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Keadle SK, Conroy DE, Buman MP, Dunstan DW, Matthews CE. Targeting reductions in sitting time to increase physical activity and improve health. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(8):1572.
pubmed: 28272267
pmcid: 5511092
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001257
Wijndaele K, Orrow G, Ekelund U, Sharp SJ, Brage S, Griffin SJ, et al. Increasing objectively measured sedentary time increases clustered cardiometabolic risk: a 6 year analysis of the ProActive study. Diabetologia. 2014;57(2):305–12.
pubmed: 24194101
doi: 10.1007/s00125-013-3102-y
Wiseman AJ, Lynch BM, Cameron AJ, Dunstan DW. Associations of change in television viewing time with biomarkers of postmenopausal breast cancer risk: the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study. Cancer Causes Control. 2014;25(10):1309–19.
pubmed: 25053405
doi: 10.1007/s10552-014-0433-z
Lavie CJ, Ozemek C, Carbone S, Katzmarzyk PT, Blair SN. Sedentary behavior, exercise, and cardiovascular health. Circ Res. 2019;124(5):799–815.
pubmed: 30817262
doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312669
Thivel D, Tremblay A, Genin PM, Panahi S, Rivière D, Duclos M. Physical activity, inactivity, and sedentary behaviors: definitions and implications in occupational health. Front Public Health. 2018;6:288.
pubmed: 30345266
pmcid: 6182813
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00288
Kuster RP, Grooten WJ, Blom V, Baumgartner D, Hagströmer M, Ekblom Ö. Is Sitting Always Inactive and Standing Always Active? A Simultaneous Free-Living activPal and ActiGraph Analysis. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(23):8864.
pubmed: 33260568
pmcid: 7730923
doi: 10.3390/ijerph17238864
Holtermann A, Schellewald V, Mathiassen SE, Gupta N, Pinder A, Punakallio A, et al. A practical guidance for assessments of sedentary behavior at work: a PEROSH initiative. Appl Ergon. 2017;63:41–52.
pubmed: 28502405
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.03.012
Prince SA, Cardilli L, Reed JL, Saunders TJ, Kite C, Douillette K, et al. A comparison of self-reported and device measured sedentary behaviour in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17(1):1–17.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00938-3
Bames J, Behrens TK, Benden ME, Biddle S, Bond D, Brassard P, et al. Letter to the Editor: Standardized use of the terms sedentary and sedentary behaviours. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab-Physiol Appl Nutr Metab. 2012;37:540–2.
doi: 10.1139/h2012-024
Tremblay MS, Aubert S, Barnes JD, Saunders TJ, Carson V, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. Sedentary behavior research network (SBRN)-terminology consensus project process and outcome. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14(1):1–17.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0525-8
Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Ekelund U, Delisle Nyström C, Mora-Gonzalez J, Löf M, et al. Accelerometer data collection and processing criteria to assess physical activity and other outcomes: a systematic review and practical considerations. Sports Med. 2017;47(9):1821–45.
pubmed: 28303543
pmcid: 6231536
doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0
Kim Y, Beets MW, Welk GJ. Everything you wanted to know about selecting the “right” Actigraph accelerometer cut-points for youth, but...: a systematic review. J Sci Med Sport. 2012;15(4):311–21.
McGarty AM, Penpraze V, Melville CA. Calibration and cross-validation of the ActiGraph wGT3X+ accelerometer for the estimation of physical activity intensity in children with intellectual disabilities. PloS one. 2016;11(10):e0164928.
pubmed: 27760219
pmcid: 5070820
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164928
Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Lyden K, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS. Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(8):1561–7.
pubmed: 21233777
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820ce174
Grant PM, Ryan CG, Tigbe WW, Granat MH. The validation of a novel activity monitor in the measurement of posture and motion during everyday activities. Br J Sports Med. 2006;40(12):992–7.
pubmed: 16980531
pmcid: 2577473
doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2006.030262
Di CZ, Crainiceanu CM, Caffo BS, Punjabi NM. Multilevel functional principal component analysis. Ann Appl Stat. 2009;3(1):458.
pubmed: 20221415
pmcid: 2835171
doi: 10.1214/08-AOAS206
Xu SY, Nelson S, Kerr J, Godbole S, Johnson E, Patterson RE, et al. Modeling temporal variation in physical activity using functional principal components analysis. Stat Biosci. 2019;11(2):403–21.
doi: 10.1007/s12561-019-09237-3
Xiao Q, Lu J, Zeitzer JM, Matthews CE, Saint-Maurice PF, Bauer C. Rest-activity profiles among US adults in a nationally representative sample: a functional principal component analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022;19(1):1–13.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01274-4
Zeitzer JM, Blackwell T, Hoffman AR, Cummings S, Ancoli-Israel S, Stone K, et al. Daily patterns of accelerometer activity predict changes in sleep, cognition, and mortality in older men. J Gerontol A. 2018;73(5):682–7.
doi: 10.1093/gerona/glw250
Paterson C, Fryer S, Zieff G, Stone K, Credeur DP, Barone Gibbs B, et al. The effects of acute exposure to prolonged sitting, with and without interruption, on vascular function among adults: a meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2020;50(11):1929–42.
pubmed: 32757163
doi: 10.1007/s40279-020-01325-5
Wheeler MJ, Dunstan DW, Ellis KA, Cerin E, Phillips S, Lambert G, et al. Effect of morning exercise with or without breaks in prolonged sitting on blood pressure in older overweight/obese adults: Evidence for sex differences. Hypertension. 2019;73(4):859–67.
pubmed: 30782027
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.12373
Dempsey PC, Larsen RN, Dunstan DW, Owen N, Kingwell BA. Sitting less and moving more: implications for hypertension. Hypertension. 2018;72(5):1037–46.
pubmed: 30354827
doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11190
Lee PH, Wong FK. The association between time spent in sedentary behaviors and blood pressure: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. 2015;45(6):867–80.
pubmed: 25749843
doi: 10.1007/s40279-015-0322-y
Hartman SJ, Dillon LW, LaCroix AZ, Natarajan L, Sears DD, Owen N, et al. Interrupting sitting time in postmenopausal women: Protocol for the rise for health randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021;10(5):e28684.
pubmed: 33983131
pmcid: 8160808
doi: 10.2196/28684
ActiGraph Software Department. ActiLife v6. ActiGraphCorp.com. https://theactigraph.com/downloads#user-manuals/ . Accessed 2 May 2023.
ActiGraph. GT3X+ and wGT3X+ Device Manual. theactigraph.com. https://dl.theactigraph.com/GT3Xp_wGT3Xp_Device_Manual.pdf . Accessed 1 Feb 2023.
Choi L, Liu Z, Matthews CE, Buchowski MS. Validation of accelerometer wear and nonwear time classification algorithm. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011;43(2):357.
pubmed: 20581716
pmcid: 3184184
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181ed61a3
Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport. 2011;14(5):411–6.
pubmed: 21616714
doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2011.04.003
Dunstan DW, Dogra S, Carter SE, Owen N. Sit less and move more for cardiovascular health: emerging insights and opportunities. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021;18(9):637–48.
pubmed: 34017139
doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00547-y
Webster KE, Zhou W, Gallagher NA, Smith EML, Gothe NP, Ploutz-Snyder R, et al. Device-measured sedentary behavior in oldest old adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prev Med Rep. 2021;23:101405.
pubmed: 34136338
pmcid: 8181193
doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101405
Hooker SP, Hutto B, Zhu W, Blair SN, Colabianchi N, Vena JE, et al. Accelerometer measured sedentary behavior and physical activity in white and black adults: the REGARDS study. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19(4):336–41.
pubmed: 25937313
doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2015.04.006
Goldsmith J, Scheipl F, Huang L, Wrobel J, Di C, Gellar J, et al. refund: Regression with Functional Data. R package version 0.1-26. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=refund . Accessed 10 Dec 2023.
Gertheiss J, Goldsmith J, Crainiceanu C, Greven S. Longitudinal scalar-on-functions regression with application to tractography data. Biostatistics. 2013;14(3):447–61.
pubmed: 23292804
pmcid: 3677735
doi: 10.1093/biostatistics/kxs051
Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. 1995;57(1):289–300.
doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna. https://www.R-project.org/ . Accessed 10 Dec 2023.
Heesch KC, Hill RL, Aguilar-Farias N, Van Uffelen JG, Pavey T. Validity of objective methods for measuring sedentary behaviour in older adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2018;15(1):1–17.
doi: 10.1186/s12966-018-0749-2
Barreira TV, Zderic TW, Schuna JM Jr, Hamilton MT, Tudor-Locke C. Free-living activity counts-derived breaks in sedentary time: Are they real transitions from sitting to standing? Gait Posture. 2015;42(1):70–2.
pubmed: 25953504
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.04.008
Quante M, Kaplan ER, Rueschman M, Cailler M, Buxton OM, Redline S. Practical considerations in using accelerometers to assess physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep. Sleep Health. 2015;1(4):275–84.
pubmed: 29073403
doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2015.09.002
Aguilar-Farías N, Brown WJ, Peeters GG. ActiGraph GT3X+ cut-points for identifying sedentary behaviour in older adults in free-living environments. J Sci Med Sport. 2014;17(3):293–9.
pubmed: 23932934
doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2013.07.002
Khatri P, Sirota M, Butte AJ. Ten years of pathway analysis: current approaches and outstanding challenges. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(2):e1002375.
pubmed: 22383865
pmcid: 3285573
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002375
Goldsmith J, Greven S, Crainiceanu C. Corrected confidence bands for functional data using principal components. Biometrics. 2013;69(1):41–51.
pubmed: 23003003
doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01808.x
Yao F, Lee TC. Penalized spline models for functional principal component analysis. J R Stat Soc Ser B Stat Methodol. 2006;68(1):3–25.
doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00530.x
Narayanan A, Desai F, Stewart T, Duncan S, Mackay L. Application of raw accelerometer data and machine-learning techniques to characterize human movement behavior: a systematic scoping review. J Phys Act Health. 2020;17(3):360–83.
pubmed: 32035416
doi: 10.1123/jpah.2019-0088
Greenwood-Hickman MA, Nakandala S, Jankowska MM, Rosenberg DE, Tuz-Zahra F, Bellettiere J, et al. The CNN Hip Accelerometer Posture (CHAP) method for classifying sitting patterns from hip accelerometers: A validation study. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021;53(11):2445.
pubmed: 34033622
pmcid: 8516667
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002705
Ellis K, Kerr J, Godbole S, Staudenmayer J, Lanckriet G. Hip and wrist accelerometer algorithms for free-living behavior classification. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48(5):933.
pubmed: 26673126
pmcid: 4833514
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000840
Schiffrin EL. How structure, mechanics, and function of the vasculature contribute to blood pressure elevation in hypertension. Can J Cardiol. 2020;36(5):648–58.
pubmed: 32389338
doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2020.02.003
Oliveros E, Patel H, Kyung S, Fugar S, Goldberg A, Madan N, et al. Hypertension in older adults: assessment, management, and challenges. Clin Cardiol. 2020;43(2):99–107.
pubmed: 31825114
doi: 10.1002/clc.23303
Barone Gibbs B, Kowalsky RJ, Perdomo SJ, Taormina JM, Balzer JR, Jakicic JM. Effect of alternating standing and sitting on blood pressure and pulse wave velocity during a simulated workday in adults with overweight/obesity. J Hypertens. 2017;35(12):2411–8.
pubmed: 28704258
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001463
Bhammar DM, Sawyer BJ, Tucker WJ, Gaesser GA. Breaks in sitting time: effects on continuously monitored glucose and blood pressure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49(10):2119–30.
pubmed: 28514264
doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001315
Dempsey PC, Sacre JW, Larsen RN, Straznicky NE, Sethi P, Cohen ND, et al. Interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light walking or simple resistance activities reduces resting blood pressure and plasma noradrenaline in type 2 diabetes. J Hypertens. 2016;34(12):2376–82.
pubmed: 27512975
doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001101
Larsen RN, Kingwell BA, Sethi P, Cerin E, Owen N, Dunstan DW. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces resting blood pressure in overweight/obese adults. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2014;24(9):976–82.
pubmed: 24875670
doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.04.011
Grooten WJ, Äng BO, Hagströmer M, Conradsson D, Nero H, Franzén E. Does a dynamic chair increase office workers’ movements?-results from a combined laboratory and field study. Appl Ergon. 2017;60:1–11.
pubmed: 28166867
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2016.10.006
Levine JA, Schleusner SJ, Jensen MD. Energy expenditure of nonexercise activity. Am J Clin Nut. 2000;72(6):1451–4.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/72.6.1451
Koepp GA, Moore GK, Levine JA. Chair-based fidgeting and energy expenditure. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2016;2(1):e000152.
pubmed: 27900194
pmcid: 5117084
doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2016-000152
Chung N, Park MY, Kim J, Park HY, Hwang H, Lee CH, et al. Non-exercise activity thermogenesis (NEAT): a component of total daily energy expenditure. J Exerc Nutr Biochem. 2018;22(2):23.
doi: 10.20463/jenb.2018.0013
Jacobs DA, Ferris DP. Estimation of ground reaction forces and ankle moment with multiple, low-cost sensors. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2015;12(1):1–12.
doi: 10.1186/s12984-015-0081-x
Meinders E, Booij MJ, van den Noort JC, Harlaar J. How to compare knee kinetics at different walking speeds? Gait Posture. 2021;88:225–30.
pubmed: 34119777
doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.06.004
National Research Platform (NRP), San Diego Supercomputer Center at University of California San Diego. Nautilus. https://portal.nrp-nautilus.io , https://www.sdsc.edu/services/hpc/nrp/index.html . Accessed 30 Jan 2023.