Combined Metabolic Activators with Different NAD+ Precursors Improve Metabolic Functions in the Animal Models of Neurodegenerative Diseases.

Alzheimer’s disease Parkinson’s disease animal models combined metabolic activators

Journal

Biomedicines
ISSN: 2227-9059
Titre abrégé: Biomedicines
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101691304

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 21 03 2024
revised: 08 04 2024
accepted: 17 04 2024
medline: 27 4 2024
pubmed: 27 4 2024
entrez: 27 4 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic abnormalities are acknowledged as significant factors in the onset of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our research has demonstrated that the use of combined metabolic activators (CMA) may alleviate metabolic dysfunctions and stimulate mitochondrial metabolism. Therefore, the use of CMA could potentially be an effective therapeutic strategy to slow down or halt the progression of PD and AD. CMAs include substances such as the glutathione precursors (L-serine and N-acetyl cysteine), the NAD+ precursor (nicotinamide riboside), and L-carnitine tartrate. Here, we tested the effect of two different formulations, including CMA1 (nicotinamide riboside, L-serine, N-acetyl cysteine, L-carnitine tartrate), and CMA2 (nicotinamide, L-serine, N-acetyl cysteine, L-carnitine tartrate), as well as their individual components, on the animal models of AD and PD. We assessed the brain and liver tissues for pathological changes and immunohistochemical markers. Additionally, in the case of PD, we performed behavioral tests and measured responses to apomorphine-induced rotations. Histological analysis showed that the administration of both CMA1 and CMA2 formulations led to improvements in hyperemia, degeneration, and necrosis in neurons for both AD and PD models. Moreover, the administration of CMA2 showed a superior effect compared to CMA1. This was further corroborated by immunohistochemical data, which indicated a reduction in immunoreactivity in the neurons. Additionally, notable metabolic enhancements in liver tissues were observed using both formulations. In PD rat models, the administration of both formulations positively influenced the behavioral functions of the animals. Our findings suggest that the administration of both CMA1 and CMA2 markedly enhanced metabolic and behavioral outcomes, aligning with neuro-histological observations. These findings underscore the promise of CMA2 administration as an effective therapeutic strategy for enhancing metabolic parameters and cognitive function in AD and PD patients.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Mitochondrial dysfunction and metabolic abnormalities are acknowledged as significant factors in the onset of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease (PD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Our research has demonstrated that the use of combined metabolic activators (CMA) may alleviate metabolic dysfunctions and stimulate mitochondrial metabolism. Therefore, the use of CMA could potentially be an effective therapeutic strategy to slow down or halt the progression of PD and AD. CMAs include substances such as the glutathione precursors (L-serine and N-acetyl cysteine), the NAD+ precursor (nicotinamide riboside), and L-carnitine tartrate.
METHODS METHODS
Here, we tested the effect of two different formulations, including CMA1 (nicotinamide riboside, L-serine, N-acetyl cysteine, L-carnitine tartrate), and CMA2 (nicotinamide, L-serine, N-acetyl cysteine, L-carnitine tartrate), as well as their individual components, on the animal models of AD and PD. We assessed the brain and liver tissues for pathological changes and immunohistochemical markers. Additionally, in the case of PD, we performed behavioral tests and measured responses to apomorphine-induced rotations.
FINDINGS RESULTS
Histological analysis showed that the administration of both CMA1 and CMA2 formulations led to improvements in hyperemia, degeneration, and necrosis in neurons for both AD and PD models. Moreover, the administration of CMA2 showed a superior effect compared to CMA1. This was further corroborated by immunohistochemical data, which indicated a reduction in immunoreactivity in the neurons. Additionally, notable metabolic enhancements in liver tissues were observed using both formulations. In PD rat models, the administration of both formulations positively influenced the behavioral functions of the animals.
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
Our findings suggest that the administration of both CMA1 and CMA2 markedly enhanced metabolic and behavioral outcomes, aligning with neuro-histological observations. These findings underscore the promise of CMA2 administration as an effective therapeutic strategy for enhancing metabolic parameters and cognitive function in AD and PD patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38672280
pii: biomedicines12040927
doi: 10.3390/biomedicines12040927
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
ID : 72110

Auteurs

Ozlem Altay (O)

Science for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden.

Hong Yang (H)

Science for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden.

Serkan Yildirim (S)

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey.

Cemil Bayram (C)

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey.

Ismail Bolat (I)

Department of Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey.

Sena Oner (S)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey.

Ozlem Ozdemir Tozlu (OO)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey.

Mehmet Enes Arslan (ME)

Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science, Erzurum Technical University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey.

Ahmet Hacimuftuoglu (A)

Department of Medical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey.

Saeed Shoaie (S)

Centre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.

Cheng Zhang (C)

Science for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden.

Jan Borén (J)

Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden.

Mathias Uhlén (M)

Science for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden.

Hasan Turkez (H)

Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Atatürk University, Erzurum 25240, Turkey.

Adil Mardinoglu (A)

Science for Life Laboratory, KTH-Royal Institute of Technology, 171 65 Stockholm, Sweden.
Centre for Host-Microbiome Interactions, Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK.

Classifications MeSH