Effectiveness of motivational interviewing on medication adherence for the prevention of recurrent stroke or transient ischemic attack: Systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

medication adherence motivational interviewing stroke systematic review transient ischemic attack

Journal

European journal of neurology
ISSN: 1468-1331
Titre abrégé: Eur J Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9506311

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Apr 2024
Historique:
revised: 28 03 2024
received: 02 02 2024
accepted: 08 04 2024
medline: 27 4 2024
pubmed: 27 4 2024
entrez: 27 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This systematic review examines the effectiveness of motivational interviewing (MI) on medication adherence for preventing recurrent stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA). MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 12 June 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing MI with usual care or interventions without MI in participants with any stroke type were identified and summarized descriptively. Primary outcome was medication adherence. Secondary outcomes were quality of life (QoL) and different clinical outcomes. We assessed risk of bias with RoB 2 (revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool) and intervention complexity with the iCAT_SR (intervention Complexity Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews). We screened 691 records for eligibility and included four studies published in five articles. The studies included a total of 2751 participants, and three were multicentric. Three studies had a high risk of bias, and interventions varied in complexity. Two studies found significantly improved medication adherence, one at 9 (96.9% vs. 88.2%, risk ratio = 1.098, 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.17) and one at 12 months (97.0% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.026), but not at other time points, whereas two other studies reported no significant changes. No significant differences were found in QoL or clinical outcomes. Evidence on MI appears inconclusive for improving medication adherence for recurrent stroke and TIA prevention, with no benefits on QoL and clinical outcomes. There is a need for robustly designed studies and process evaluations of MI as a complex intervention for people with stroke. PROSPERO (CRD42023433284).

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
This systematic review examines the effectiveness of motivational interviewing (MI) on medication adherence for preventing recurrent stroke and transient ischemic attack (TIA).
METHODS METHODS
MEDLINE (via PubMed), CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to 12 June 2023. Randomized controlled trials comparing MI with usual care or interventions without MI in participants with any stroke type were identified and summarized descriptively. Primary outcome was medication adherence. Secondary outcomes were quality of life (QoL) and different clinical outcomes. We assessed risk of bias with RoB 2 (revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool) and intervention complexity with the iCAT_SR (intervention Complexity Assessment Tool for Systematic Reviews).
RESULTS RESULTS
We screened 691 records for eligibility and included four studies published in five articles. The studies included a total of 2751 participants, and three were multicentric. Three studies had a high risk of bias, and interventions varied in complexity. Two studies found significantly improved medication adherence, one at 9 (96.9% vs. 88.2%, risk ratio = 1.098, 95% confidence interval = 1.03-1.17) and one at 12 months (97.0% vs. 95.0%, p = 0.026), but not at other time points, whereas two other studies reported no significant changes. No significant differences were found in QoL or clinical outcomes.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Evidence on MI appears inconclusive for improving medication adherence for recurrent stroke and TIA prevention, with no benefits on QoL and clinical outcomes. There is a need for robustly designed studies and process evaluations of MI as a complex intervention for people with stroke.
REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
PROSPERO (CRD42023433284).

Identifiants

pubmed: 38676444
doi: 10.1111/ene.16313
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e16313

Subventions

Organisme : Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
ID : 01GY2107

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Neurology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Academy of Neurology.

Références

GBD 2019 Stroke Collaborators. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20:795‐820.
Kernan WN, Ovbiagele B, Black HR, et al. Guidelines for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:2160‐2236.
Strilciuc S, Grad DA, Radu C, et al. The economic burden of stroke: a systematic review of cost of illness studies. J Med Life. 2021;14:606‐619.
Sacco RL, Kasner SE, Broderick JP, et al. An updated definition of stroke for the 21st century: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2013;44:2064‐2089.
Easton JD, Saver JL, Albers GW, et al. Definition and evaluation of transient ischemic attack. Stroke. 2009;40:2276‐2293.
Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, et al. Guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021;2021(52):e364‐e467.
Mohan KM, Wolfe CDA, Rudd AG, Heuschmann PU, Kolominsky‐Rabas PL, Grieve AP. Risk and cumulative risk of stroke recurrence: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Stroke. 2011;42:1489‐1494.
Zhang J, Gong Y, Zhao Y, Jiang N, Wang J, Yin X. Post‐stroke medication adherence and persistence rates: a meta‐analysis of observational studies. J Neurol. 2021;268:2090‐2098.
Al AlShaikh S, Quinn T, Dunn W, et al. Predictive factors of non‐adherence to secondary preventative medication after stroke or transient ischaemic attack: a systematic review and meta‐analyses. Eur Stroke J. 2016;1:65‐75.
Palacio A, Garay D, Langer B, Taylor J, Wood BA, Tamariz L. Motivational interviewing improves medication adherence: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Gen Intern Med. 2016;31:929‐940.
Papus M, Dima AL, Viprey M, Schott AM, Schneider MP, Novais T. Motivational interviewing to support medication adherence in adults with chronic conditions: systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105:3186‐3203.
Zomahoun HTV, Guénette L, Grégoire J‐P, et al. Effectiveness of motivational interviewing interventions on medication adherence in adults with chronic diseases: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Int J Epidemiol. 2017;46:589‐602.
Aubeeluck E, Al‐Arkee S, Finlay K, et al. The impact of pharmacy care and motivational interviewing on improving medication adherence in patients with cardiovascular diseases: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75:e14457.
Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd ed. Guilford Press; 2013.
Higgings JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.3 (Updated) 2022. Cochrane; 2020 Accessed April 30, 2023. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
Munn Z, Stern C, Aromataris E, Lockwood C, Jordan Z. What kind of systematic review should I conduct? A proposed typology and guidance for systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:5.
Yang M, Cheng H, Wang X, et al. Antithrombotics prescription and adherence among stroke survivors: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Brain BehavBrain Behav. 2022;12:e2752.
Lefebvre C, Glanville J, Briscoe S, et al. Technical supplement to chapter 4: searching for and selecting studies. In: Higgings JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al., eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6. Cochrane; 2022 Accesssed April 30, 2023. https://training.cochrane.org/handbook
Cheng D, Qu Z, Huang J, et al. Motivational interviewing for improving recovery after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;6:1‐25.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:210.
Lewin S, Hendry M, Chandler J, et al. Guidance for using the iCAT_SR: intervention complexity assessment tool for systematic reviews (version 1.0). Cochrane Methods. 2016:1‐17. Accessed June 13, 2023; https://static‐content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1186%2Fs12874‐017‐0349‐x/MediaObjects/12874_2017_349_MOESM4_ESM.pdf
Cadogan CA, Rankin A, Lewin S, Hughes CM. Application of the intervention complexity assessment tool for systematic reviews within a Cochrane review: an illustrative case study. HRB Open Res. 2020;3:31.
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.
Ahmadi M, Laumeier I, Ihl T, et al. A support programme for secondary prevention in patients with transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke (INSPiRE‐TMS): an open‐label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:49‐60.
Ihl T, Ahmadi M, Laumeier I, et al. Patient‐centered outcomes in a randomized trial investigating a multimodal prevention program after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke: the INSPiRE‐TMS trial. Stroke. 2022;53:2730‐2738.
Barker‐Collo S, Krishnamurthi R, Witt E, et al. Improving adherence to secondary stroke prevention strategies through motivational interviewing: randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2015;46:3451‐3458.
Hedegaard U, Kjeldsen LJ, Pottegård A, Bak S, Hallas J. Multifaceted intervention including motivational interviewing to support medication adherence after stroke/transient ischemic attack: a randomized trial. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2014;4:221‐234.
Mackenzie G, Ireland S, Moore S, et al. Tailored interventions to improve hypertension management after stroke or TIA—phase II (TIMS II). Can J Neurosci Nurs. 2013;35:27‐34.
Leistner S, Michelson G, Laumeier I, et al. Intensified secondary prevention intending a reduction of recurrent events in TIA and minor stroke patients (INSPiRE‐TMS): a protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMC Neurol. 2013;13:11.
Krishnamurthi R, Witt E, Barker‐Collo S, et al. Reducing recurrent stroke: methodology of the motivational interviewing in stroke (MIST) randomized clinical trial. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:133‐139.
Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2021;374:n2061.
Minozzi S, Cinquini M, Gianola S, Gonzalez‐Lorenzo M, Banzi R. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2) showed low interrater reliability and challenges in its application. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;126:37‐44.

Auteurs

Kathrin Wandscher (K)

Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Falk Hoffmann (F)

Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Christoph Heesen (C)

Institute of Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis, Center for Molecular Neurobiology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Götz Thomalla (G)

Department of Neurology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Anne Christin Rahn (AC)

Nursing Research Unit, Institute for Social Medicine and Epidemiology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.

Jasmin Helbach (J)

Department of Health Services Research, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Carl von Ossietzky University Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH