Computer patient-specific 3D modeling and custom-made guides for revision ACL surgery.


Journal

The journal of knee surgery
ISSN: 1938-2480
Titre abrégé: J Knee Surg
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 101137599

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 28 4 2024
pubmed: 28 4 2024
entrez: 27 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Revision Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a challenging surgery occurring in 3-24% of primary reconstructions. A meticulous planning to study the precise size and location of both femoral and tibial bone tunnels is mandatory. The aim of the study was to evaluate the intra- and inter-operator differences in the decision-making process between experienced surgeons after they were asked to make pre-operative planning for ACL revision reconstruction with the use of both the CT scan and a 3D printed model of the knee. Data collected from 23 consecutive patients undergoing revision of ACLR for graft failure at a single Institute between September 2018 and February 2020 were prospectively reviewed. The double-blinded collected data were presented to three board-certificate attending surgeons. Surgeons were asked to decide whether to perform one-stage or two-stage revision ACLR based on the evaluation of the CT scan images and the 3D printed custom-made models at two different rounds, T0 and T1 respectively, seven days apart one from the other. Inter-operator consensus following technical mistake was 52% at T0 and 56% at T1 using the CT scans, meanwhile concordance was 95% at T0 and 94% at T1 using the 3D models. Concordance between surgeons following new knee injury was 66% at T0 and 70% at T1 using CT scans, while concordance was 96% both at T0 and T1 using 3D models. Intra-operative variability using 3D models was extremely low: concordance at T0 and T1 was 98%. McNamar test showed a statistical significance in the use of 3D model for preoperative planning (p < 0.005). 3D printed model reliability resulted to be higher compared to CT as intra-operator surgery technique selection was not modified throughout time from T0 to T1 (p < 0.005). The use of 3D printed models had the most impact when evaluating femoral and tibial tunnels, resulting to be a useful instrument during pre-operative planning of revision ACLR between attending surgeons with medium-high workflow.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38677294
doi: 10.1055/a-2315-7873
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Thieme. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Armano Del Prete (A)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

Piero Franco (P)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

Matteo Innocenti (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

Fabrizio Matassi (F)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

Filippo Leggieri (F)

Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

Rosario Sagliocco (R)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

Roberto Civinini (R)

Ortopedia, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Firenze, Italy.

Classifications MeSH