Alterations of the Ganglion Cell Complex in Age-Related Macular Degeneration: an AMISH Eye Study Analysis.

Age-related macular degeneration Ganglion cell complex

Journal

American journal of ophthalmology
ISSN: 1879-1891
Titre abrégé: Am J Ophthalmol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370500

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
25 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 23 07 2023
revised: 02 04 2024
accepted: 22 04 2024
medline: 28 4 2024
pubmed: 28 4 2024
entrez: 27 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To compare the Ganglion Cell Complex (GCC) thickness in eyes with age-related macular degeneration (AMD) versus healthy controls in an elderly Amish population DESIGN: Cross-sectional study METHODS: This is a post hoc analysis of the family-based prospective study of Amish subjects. Study subjects were imaged by the Cirrus HD-OCT (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc, Dublin, CA) using a macular cube protocol of 512 × 128 scans (128 horizontal B-scans, each compromising 512 A-scans) over a 6 mm x 6 mm region centered on the fovea. The ganglion cell analysis algorithm calculated the GCC thickness by segmenting the outer boundaries of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and inner plexiform layer (IPL) in all B-scans of the volume, with the region between these boundaries representing the combined thickness of the GCL and the IPL layer. A number of parameters were used to evaluate the GCC thickness: the average GCC thickness, minimum (lowest GCC thickness at a single meridian crossing the elliptical annulus), and sectoral (within each of six sectoral areas: superior, superotemporal, superonasal, inferior, inferonasal, and inferotemporal). The stage of AMD was graded on color fundus photographs in accordance with the Beckman Initiative for Macular Research classification system. Of 1339 subjects enrolled in the Amish eye study, a total of 1294 eyes of twelve hundred and ninety-four subjects had all required imaging studies of sufficient quality and were included in the final analysis, and of these 798 (62%) were female. Following age adjustment, the average GCC thickness was significantly (p<0.001) thinner in AMD subjects (73.71 ± SD; 13.77 µm) compared to normals (77.97 ± 10.42 µm). Independent t test showed that, early (75.03 ± 12.45 µm), and late AMD (61.64 ± 21.18 µm) groups (among which GA eyes had the lowest thickness of 58.10 ± 20.27 microns) had a statistically significant lower GCC thickness compared to eyes without AMD. There was no significant difference in average GCC thickness between early AMD and intermediate AMD (76.36 ± 9.25 µm) eyes. The GCC thickness in AMD eyes is reduced compared to normal eyes, but the relationship is complex with the greatest reduction in late AMD eyes (particularly GA eyes) but no difference between early and intermediate AMD eyes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38677638
pii: S0002-9394(24)00172-7
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2024.04.024
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Swetha Bindu Velaga (SB)

Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Ahmed Roshdy Alagorie (AR)

Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.

Mehdi Emamverdi (M)

Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Maryam Ashrafkhorasani (M)

Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Abbas Habibi (A)

Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Muneeswar Gupta Nittala (MG)

Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

Gagan Sing (G)

Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States.

Jonathan Haines (J)

Department of Population & Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio; Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio.

Margaret A Pericak-Vance (MA)

John P. Hussman Institute for Human Genomics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.

Dwight Stambolian (D)

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Srinivas R Sadda (SR)

Doheny Eye Institute, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States; Department of Ophthalmology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: SSadda@doheny.org.

Classifications MeSH