An Interdisciplinary Protocol for Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt Patient Selection in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus.
neuropsychological testing
normal pressure hydrocephalus
occupational therapy
physical therapy
rehabilitation
Journal
World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
26 Apr 2024
26 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
27
12
2023
revised:
18
04
2024
accepted:
19
04
2024
medline:
29
4
2024
pubmed:
29
4
2024
entrez:
28
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) can be treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement, but no broadly implemented indication for VPS exists. Our protocol consists of physical therapy and occupational therapy practitioners administering validated tests of gait, balance, and cognition before and after lumbar drain (LD) placement. Specific tests include: Timed "Up & Go", Tinetti Gait and Balance Assessment, Berg Balance Scale, Mini Mental Status Exam, Trail Making Test Part B, and the Rey Auditory and Visual Learning Test. Minimal clinically important difference values for each test were determined from literature review. A retrospective review of patients treated under this protocol was performed. The primary outcomes were candidacy for VPS based on the protocol and patient-reported symptomatic improvement after VPS placement. 48/75 (64%) patients received VPS. 43/48 (89.6%) of those shunted reported improved symptoms at 6 week follow up. However, 10/22 (45.5%) reported worsening symptoms at 1 year follow up. The mean Tinetti score significantly increased after LD in patients who improved with VPS compared to the no shunt group (4.27 vs -0.48, p<0.001). 6/33 (18%) patients with post-op imaging had a subdural fluid collection identified and 3/49 (6%) had other complications, including 1 seizure, 1 intracerebral hemorrhage, and 1 stroke. Standardized assessment of gait, balance, and cognition before and after temporary CSF diversion identifies patients with NPH likely to benefit from VPS placement with a low complication rate. One year after VPS, approximately half of patients had symptoms recur.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) can be treated with ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS) placement, but no broadly implemented indication for VPS exists.
METHODS
METHODS
Our protocol consists of physical therapy and occupational therapy practitioners administering validated tests of gait, balance, and cognition before and after lumbar drain (LD) placement. Specific tests include: Timed "Up & Go", Tinetti Gait and Balance Assessment, Berg Balance Scale, Mini Mental Status Exam, Trail Making Test Part B, and the Rey Auditory and Visual Learning Test. Minimal clinically important difference values for each test were determined from literature review. A retrospective review of patients treated under this protocol was performed. The primary outcomes were candidacy for VPS based on the protocol and patient-reported symptomatic improvement after VPS placement.
RESULTS
RESULTS
48/75 (64%) patients received VPS. 43/48 (89.6%) of those shunted reported improved symptoms at 6 week follow up. However, 10/22 (45.5%) reported worsening symptoms at 1 year follow up. The mean Tinetti score significantly increased after LD in patients who improved with VPS compared to the no shunt group (4.27 vs -0.48, p<0.001). 6/33 (18%) patients with post-op imaging had a subdural fluid collection identified and 3/49 (6%) had other complications, including 1 seizure, 1 intracerebral hemorrhage, and 1 stroke.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Standardized assessment of gait, balance, and cognition before and after temporary CSF diversion identifies patients with NPH likely to benefit from VPS placement with a low complication rate. One year after VPS, approximately half of patients had symptoms recur.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38679380
pii: S1878-8750(24)00697-1
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2024.04.124
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.