A Scoping Review of the Literature on Entrustable Professional Activities in Surgery Residency Programs.

Medical Knowledge Practice-Based Learning and Improvement Professionalism Systems-Based Practice

Journal

Journal of surgical education
ISSN: 1878-7452
Titre abrégé: J Surg Educ
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101303204

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
27 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 08 12 2023
accepted: 20 02 2024
medline: 29 4 2024
pubmed: 29 4 2024
entrez: 28 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Entrustable professional activities (EPAs) are a crucial component of contemporary postgraduate medical education with many surgery residency programs having implemented EPAs as a competency assessment framework to assess and provide feedback on the performance of their residents. Despite broad implementation of EPAs, there is a paucity of evidence regarding the impact of EPAs on the learners and learning environments. A first step in improving understanding of the use and impact of EPAs is by mapping the rising number of EPA-related publications from the field of surgery. The primary objective of this scoping review is to examine the nature, extent, and range of articles on the development, implementation, and assessment of EPAs. The second objective is to identify the experiences and factors that influence EPA implementation and use in practice in surgical specialties. Scoping review. Four electronic databases (Medline, Embase, Education Source, and ERIC) were searched on January 20, 2022, and then again on July 19, 2023. A quasi-statistical content analysis was employed to quantify and draw meaning from the information related to the development, implementation, assessment, validity, reliability, and experiences with EPAs in the workplace. A total of 42 empirical and nonempirical articles were included. Four thematic categories describe the topic areas in included articles related to: 1) the development and refinement of EPAs, including the multiple steps taken to develop and refine unique EPAs for surgery residency programs; 2) the methods for implementing EPAs; 3) outcomes of EPA use in practice; 4) barriers, facilitators, and areas for improvement for the implementation and use of EPAs in surgical education. This scoping review highlights the key trends and gaps from the rapidly increasing number of publications on EPAs in surgery residency, from development to their use in the workplace. Existing EPA studies lack a theoretical and/or conceptual basis; future development and implementation studies should adopt implementation science frameworks to better structure and operationalize EPAs within surgery residency programs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38679495
pii: S1931-7204(24)00108-9
doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.02.011
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Simon Kitto (S)

Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore.

Arone W Fantaye (AW)

Office of Continuing Professional Development, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.

Boris Zevin (B)

Department of Surgery, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.

Amanda Fowler (A)

Department of Surgery, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.

Ajit K Sachdeva (AK)

Division of Education, American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinios.

Isabelle Raiche (I)

Department of Surgery, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada. Electronic address: iraiche@toh.ca.

Classifications MeSH