Radiology Imaging Adds Time and Diagnostic Uncertainty when Point of Care Ultrasound Demonstrates Cholecystitis.
Diagnostic imaging
acute cholecystitis
length-of-stay
point of care ultrasound
Journal
POCUS journal
ISSN: 2369-8543
Titre abrégé: POCUS J
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 9918434088906676
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2024
2024
Historique:
medline:
29
4
2024
pubmed:
29
4
2024
entrez:
29
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is specific for acute cholecystitis (AC), but surgeons request radiology imaging (RI) prior to admitting patients with POCUS-diagnosed AC. We sought to determine the test characteristics of POCUS for AC when performed and billed by credentialed emergency physicians (EPs), the accuracy rate of RI when performed after POCUS, and the time added when RI is requested after POCUS demonstrates AC. We performed a dual-site retrospective cohort study of admitted adult ED patients who had received biliary POCUS from November 1, 2020 to April 30, 2022. Patients with previously diagnosed AC, liver failure, ascites, hepatobiliary cancer, or cholecystectomy were excluded. Descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals for point estimates were calculated. Medians were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Test characteristics of POCUS for AC were calculated using inpatient intervention for AC as the reference standard. Of 473 screened patients, 143 were included for analysis: 80 (56%) had AC according to our reference standard. POCUS was positive for AC in 46 patients: 44 true positives and two false positives, yielding a positive likelihood ratio of 17.3 (95%CI 4.4-69.0) for AC. The accuracy rate of RI after positive POCUS for AC was 39.0%. Median time from ED arrival to POCUS and ED arrival to RI were 115 (IQR 64, 207) and 313.5 (IQR 224, 541) minutes, respectively; p < 0.01. RI after positive POCUS performed by credentialed EPs takes additional time and may increase diagnostic uncertainty.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is specific for acute cholecystitis (AC), but surgeons request radiology imaging (RI) prior to admitting patients with POCUS-diagnosed AC.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
We sought to determine the test characteristics of POCUS for AC when performed and billed by credentialed emergency physicians (EPs), the accuracy rate of RI when performed after POCUS, and the time added when RI is requested after POCUS demonstrates AC.
METHODS
METHODS
We performed a dual-site retrospective cohort study of admitted adult ED patients who had received biliary POCUS from November 1, 2020 to April 30, 2022. Patients with previously diagnosed AC, liver failure, ascites, hepatobiliary cancer, or cholecystectomy were excluded. Descriptive statistics and 95% confidence intervals for point estimates were calculated. Medians were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Test characteristics of POCUS for AC were calculated using inpatient intervention for AC as the reference standard.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Of 473 screened patients, 143 were included for analysis: 80 (56%) had AC according to our reference standard. POCUS was positive for AC in 46 patients: 44 true positives and two false positives, yielding a positive likelihood ratio of 17.3 (95%CI 4.4-69.0) for AC. The accuracy rate of RI after positive POCUS for AC was 39.0%. Median time from ED arrival to POCUS and ED arrival to RI were 115 (IQR 64, 207) and 313.5 (IQR 224, 541) minutes, respectively; p < 0.01.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
RI after positive POCUS performed by credentialed EPs takes additional time and may increase diagnostic uncertainty.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38681169
doi: 10.24908/pocus.v9i1.16596
pmc: PMC11044937
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
87-94Informations de copyright
Copyright (c) 2024 David Cannata, Callista Love, Pascale Carrel, Trent She, Seth Lotterman, Felix Pacheco, Meghan Herbst.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Jonah Haber MS for his contributions to an earlier version of this work; João Delgado MD for his assistance in reviewing and editing the manuscript; and James Grady PhD for his statistical assistance. None