Occupational second-hand smoke exposure: a comparative shotgun proteomics study on nasal epithelia from healthy restaurant workers.
Mass Spectrometry
Proteomics
Second-Hand Smoke
cigarette smoke
nasal epithelium
protein network
Journal
Environmental toxicology and pharmacology
ISSN: 1872-7077
Titre abrégé: Environ Toxicol Pharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9612020
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
27 Apr 2024
27 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
26
12
2023
revised:
05
04
2024
accepted:
22
04
2024
medline:
30
4
2024
pubmed:
30
4
2024
entrez:
30
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Non-smokers exposed to second-hand smoke (SHS) present risk of developing tobacco smoke-associated pathologies. To investigate the airway molecular response to SHS exposure that could be used in health risk assessment, comparative shotgun proteomics was performed on nasal epithelium from a group of healthy restaurant workers, non-smokers (never and former) exposed and not exposed to SHS in the workplace. HIF1α-glycolytic targets (GAPDH, TPI) and proteins related to xenobiotic metabolism, cell proliferation and differentiation leading to cancer (ADH1C, TUBB4B, EEF2) showed significant modulation in non-smokers exposed. In never smokers exposed, enrichment of glutathione metabolism pathway and EEF2-regulating protein synthesis in genotoxic response were increased, while in former smokers exposed, proteins (LYZ, ATP1A1, SERPINB3) associated with tissue damage/regeneration, apoptosis inhibition and inflammation that may lead to asthma, COPD or cancer, were upregulated. The identified proteins are potential response and susceptibility/risk biomarkers for SHS exposure.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38685369
pii: S1382-6689(24)00099-1
doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2024.104459
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
104459Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.