Recommended measurement instruments for menopausal vasomotor symptoms: the COMMA (Core Outcomes in Menopause) consortium.
Journal
Menopause (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1530-0374
Titre abrégé: Menopause
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9433353
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2024
30 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline:
1
5
2024
pubmed:
1
5
2024
entrez:
30
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The aim of the study is to identify suitable definitions and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to assess each of the six core outcomes previously identified through the COMMA (Core Outcomes in Menopause) global consensus process relating to vasomotor symptoms: frequency, severity, distress/bother/interference, impact on sleep, satisfaction with treatment, and side effects. A systematic review was conducted to identify relevant definitions for the outcome of side-effects and PROMs with acceptable measurement properties for the remaining five core outcomes. The consensus process, involving 36 participants from 16 countries, was conducted to review definitions and PROMs and make final recommendations for the measurement of each core outcome. A total of 21,207 publications were screened from which 119 reporting on 40 PROMs were identified. Of these 40 PROMs, 36 either did not adequately map onto the core outcomes or lacked sufficient measurement properties. Therefore, only four PROMs corresponding to two of the six core outcomes were considered for recommendation. We recommend the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale to measure the domain of distress, bother, or interference of vasomotor symptoms and to capture impact on sleep (one item in the Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale captures interference with sleep). Six definitions of "side effects" were identified and considered. We recommend that all trials report adverse events, which is a requirement of Good Clinical Practice. We identified suitable definitions and PROMs for only three of the six core outcomes. No suitable PROMs were found for the remaining three outcomes (frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms and satisfaction with treatment). Future studies should develop and validate PROMs for these outcomes.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38688464
doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002370
pii: 00042192-990000000-00324
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 by The North American Menopause Society.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Financial disclosure/conflicts of interest: V.P. received past funding from Sigvaris AG. M.P. received institutional funding from University of Melbourne (Internal Grant Schemes), Royal Women's Hospital (Internal grant scheme), and Cancer Council NSW Project Grant RG 21-06, Centre for Research Excellence in Women's Health in Reproductive Life (CREWHiRL) Seed Funding and Project Support Grant, NHMRC (APP1163202), and Royal Children's Hospital Foundation. She received past funding from FertilityIQ webinar honorarium. She has received fee registration fees as an invited speaker by the Pacific Society of Reproductive Medicine 2023 Conference and had subsidized flights and accommodations as an invited speaker for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2022 Conference. She was also given free registration as an invited speaker for the Annual Scientific Meeting of Breast Cancer Trials 2021. D.A. has consulted for Evestra, Exeltis, Lupin, Mithra, ObsEva, and TherapeuticsMD, received industry support for research from AbbVie, Mithra, Myovant, and ObsEva, and has stock holdings in Agile Therapeutics, InnovaGyn, Inc. N.A. receives ongoing institutional funding from the National Cancer Institute. J.C. is owner of JSCarpenter, LLC which received scale licensing fees from Mapi Research Trust (2022), consulting fees from the University of Wisconsin (spring 2022), and consulting fees from Simumetrix SMX Health (spring 2022). M.C. has been paid for developing and delivering educational presentations for Alliance Chicago, received fees for an educational video and speaking engagements with Fertility IQ, wrote a White Paper on GSM for Materna (no financial reimbursement), and is a member of The Menopause Society Board of Trustees. M.D. receives current institutional funding from National Institute of Health Research. She serves as a chief investigator on POISE study (research relevant to HRT) and a chief investigator for BLUSH study (research on treatment of menopause). She received past institutional funding from Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology as editor of volume on menopause management published 2022. She is an elected member of the Medical Advisory Council of the British Menopause Society, is a member of the ESHRE guideline update group on Premature Ovarian Insufficiency, is a member of the British Endocrine Society working group producing clinical guidelines on estrogen treatment, and is a member of the British Gynaecological Cancer Society working group producing clinical guidelines on HRT. T.H. received past funding from Besins and Astellas. M.H. receives ongoing funding from Rightsteps and current funding from Hello Therapeutics. L.K. has lectured and/or acted in an advisory capacity for Gedeon Richter, Dr. KADE Besins and Mithra. P.M. has received compensation as a member of the scientific advisory board of Astellas, Bayer, and Johnson & Johnson; compensation from AbbVie and Pfizer for consulting; and serves as a member of the scientific advisory board and has/had equity in Alloy, Estrigenix, and MidiHealth. She has received speaking fees and travel support from Mithra. R.E.N. has ongoing relationships with Abbott, Astellas, Bayer HealthCare AG, Besins Healthcare, Exeltis, Fidia, Gedeon Richter, HRA Pharma, Merck Healthcare, Novo Nordisk, Shionogi Limited, Theramex, and Viatris. N.P. has lectured and/or acted in an advisory capacity for Abbott, Lawley, Mithra, Novo, SeCur, and Viatris. S.R. has lectured and/or acted in an advisory capacity or conducted studies for Abbott, Bayer, Gedeon Richter, Mylan, Amgen, UCB, Theramex, and Viatris. J.S. receives grant/research support from AbbVie, Inc., Bayer Healthcare LLC., Dare´ Bioscience; Ipsen, Mylan/Viatris Inc., Myovant Sciences, Sebela Pharmaceuticals Inc. He acts as a consultant is on advisory boards for Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Besins Healthcare, California Institute of Integral Studies (CIIS), Dare´ Bioscience, Femasys Inc., Khyria, Madorra Pty Ltd., Mayne Pharma, Inc., and Vella Bioscience Inc. He serves on speaker's bureaus for Astellas Pharma, Inc., Mayne Pharma, Inc., Myovant Sciences, Inc., Pfizer Inc., Pharmavite LLC., Scynexis Inc. He is a stockholder (direct purchase) of Sermonix Pharmaceuticals. P.S. has received fees for giving educational presentations, participating in advisory boards and conducting research by Besins Healthcare, Astellas, Mylan, Labatec, Exeltis, Effik, Theramex, and Gedeon-Richter. A.J.V. has received fees for presentations and participation in an advisory board from Besins and Theramex. W.W. has received institutional support with an unrestricted grant from Pfizer and sits on the advisory boards of Pfizer, Lupin, and Biosyent. She has received fees for educational presentations for Lupin, Astellas, Bayer and Pfizer, and Biosyent. She is a board member of the International Menopause Society and the President of the Canadian Menopause Society. M.H. has received funding from Madorra for a study of a device to manage GU symptoms and is a clinical expert for the NICE Menopause Guidelines. J.T.G. is a speaker for NurtureMed Pharma, Bayer Phils, Corbridge Phils, and Zuellig Pharma. P.S. has a research consultancy relationship with Chugai Pharmaceuticals. H.J. receives grant funding from the National Institutes of Health, Merck, and Pfizer and is a consultant to Bayer, Merck, and Hello Therapeutics. She receives in kind support from Sage to her institution (drug provided to support NIH-funded trial), funds from Bayer support a pilot grant program she lead within an NIH-funded Center grant. Her spouse is employed by Arsenal Biosciences and receives equity from Merck Research Labs. N.J. is on the advisory board of Vira Health, UK. All other authors report no conflicts of interest.
Références
Crandall CJ, Mehta JM, Manson JE. Management of menopausal symptoms: a review. JAMA 2023;329:405–420. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.24140
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.24140
Thurston RC, Joffe H. Vasomotor symptoms and menopause: findings from the Study of Women's Health across the Nation. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2011;38:489–501. doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.05.006
doi: 10.1016/j.ogc.2011.05.006
“The 2023 Nonhormone Therapy Position Statement of The North American Menopause Society” Advisory Panel. The 2023 nonhormone therapy position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 2023;30:573–590. doi: 10.1097/gme.0000000000002200
doi: 10.1097/gme.0000000000002200
Iliodromiti S, Wang W, Lumsden MA, et al. Variation in menopausal vasomotor symptoms outcomes in clinical trials: a systematic review. Bjog 2020;127:320–333. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15990
doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15990
Lensen S, Archer D, Bell RJ, et al. A core outcome set for vasomotor symptoms associated with menopause: the COMMA (Core Outcomes in Menopause) global initiative. Menopause 2021;28:852–858. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001787
doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001787
Lensen S, Bell RJ, Carpenter JS, et al. A core outcome set for genitourinary symptoms associated with menopause: the COMMA (Core Outcomes in Menopause) global initiative. Menopause 2021;28:859–866. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001788
doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001788
Kim BV, Iliodromiti S, Christmas M, Bell R, Lensen S, Hickey M; International COMMA (Core Outcomes in Menopause) Consortium. Protocol for development of a core outcome set for menopausal symptoms (COMMA). Menopause 2020;27:1371–1375. doi: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001632
doi: 10.1097/gme.0000000000001632
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Syst Rev 2021;10:89. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4
Prinsen CA, Vohra S, Rose MR, et al. How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a “Core Outcome Set” - a practical guideline. Trials 2016;17:449. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2
doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2
Terwee CB, Prinsen CAC, Chiarotto A, et al. COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2018;27:1159–1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0
Mokkink LB, de Vet HCW, Prinsen CAC, et al. COSMIN Risk of Bias checklist for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures. Qual Life Res 2018;27:1171–1179. doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
doi: 10.1007/s11136-017-1765-4
Prinsen CAC, Mokkink LB, Bouter LM, et al. COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures. Qual Life Res 2018;27:1147–1157. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Greene JG. A factor analytic study of climacteric symptoms. J Psychosom Res 1976;20:425–430. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(76)90005-2
doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(76)90005-2
Chattha R, Kulkarni R, Nagarathna R, Nagendra HR. Factor analysis of Greene's Climacteric Scale for Indian women. Maturitas 2008;59:22–27. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.10.011
doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2007.10.011
Chen RQ, Davis SR, Wong CM, Lam TH. Validity and cultural equivalence of the standard Greene Climacteric Scale in Hong Kong. Menopause 2010;17:630–635. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181ca0adb
doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181ca0adb
Vasconcelos-Raposo J, Coelho E, Fernandes HM, Rodrigues C, Moreira H, Teixeira C. Factor structure and normative data of the Greene Climacteric Scale among postmenopausal Portuguese women. Maturitas 2012;72:256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.04.003
doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.04.003
Carpenter JS. The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale: a tool for assessing the impact of hot flashes on quality of life following breast cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001;22:979–989. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00353-0
doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00353-0
Carpenter JS, Rand KL. Modeling the hot flash experience in breast cancer survivors. Menopause 2008;15:469–475. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181591db7
doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181591db7
Rand KL, Otte JL, Flockhart D, et al. Modeling hot flushes and quality of life in breast cancer survivors. Climacteric. 2011;14:171–180. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13697131003717070
doi: 10.3109/13697131003717070
Carpenter JS, Bakoyannis G, Otte JL, et al. Validity, cut-points, and minimally important differences for two hot flash-related daily interference scales. Menopause 2017;24:877–885. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000871
doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000871
Hunter MS, Nuttall J, Fenlon D. A comparison of three outcome measures of the impact of vasomotor symptoms on women's lives. Climacteric 2019;22:419–423. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2019.1580258
doi: 10.1080/13697137.2019.1580258
Lewis JE, Hilditch JR, Wong CJ. Further psychometric property development of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire and development of a modified version, MENQOL-Intervention questionnaire. Maturitas 2005;50:209–221. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.015.
doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2004.06.015
Hilditch JR, Lewis J, Peter A, et al. A menopause-specific quality of life questionnaire: development and psychometric properties. Maturitas 2008;61(1–2):107–121. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.09.014
doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.09.014
Kulasingam S, Moineddin R, Lewis JE, Tierney MC. The validity of the Menopause Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire in older women. Maturitas 2008;60:239–243. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.07.002
doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2008.07.002
Fallahzadeh H. Quality of life after the menopause in Iran: a population study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:813–819. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9644-2
doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9644-2
Radtke JV, Terhorst L, Cohen SM. The Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire: psychometric evaluation among breast cancer survivors. Menopause 2011;18:289–295. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181ef975a
doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e3181ef975a
Turhan E, Inandi T. Assessment of reliability and validity of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire in a Turkish Population. HealthMED 2011;5:111–117.
Van Dole KB, DeVellis RF, Brown RD, Funk MLJ, Gaynes BN, Williams RE. Evaluation of the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire: a factor-analytic approach. Menopause 2012;19:211–215. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31822817f9
doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31822817f9
Bener A, Falah A. A measurement-specific quality-of-life satisfaction during premenopause, perimenopause and postmenopause in Arabian Qatari women. J Midlife Health 2014;5:126–134. doi: 10.4103/0976-7800.141190
doi: 10.4103/0976-7800.141190
Bushmakin AG, Abraham L, Pinkerton JV, Cappelleri JC, Mirkin S. Evaluation of the measurement model and clinically important differences for menopause-specific quality of life associated with bazedoxifene/conjugated estrogens. Menopause 2014;21:815–822. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000176
doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000176
Ghazanfarpour M, Kaviani M, Rezaiee M, Ghaderi E, Zandvakili F. Cross cultural adaptation of the menopause specific questionnaire into the Persian language. Ann Med Health Sci Res 2014;4:325–329. doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.133453
doi: 10.4103/2141-9248.133453
Hasan SS, Ahmadi K, Santigo R, Ahmed SI. The validity of the Menopause-specific Quality of Life questionnaire in women with type 2 diabetes. Climacteric 2014;17:456–464. doi: 10.3109/13697137.2013.864269
doi: 10.3109/13697137.2013.864269
Nie G, Yang H, Liu J, Zhao C, Wang X. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Menopause-Specific Quality-of-Life questionnaire. Menopause 2017;24:546–554. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000784
doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000784
Coon C, Bushmakin A, Tatlock S, et al. Evaluation of a crosswalk between the European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level and the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life questionnaire. Climacteric 2018;21:566–573. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1481381
doi: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1481381
Dolye C, Adams L, McAndrew A, et al. Validation of the MENQOL for use with women who have been treated for gynecologic or breast cancer. Can Oncol Nurs J 2018;28:228–233.
Phligbua W, Smith EML, Barton DL. Psychometric properties of the Menopause Specific Quality of Life questionnaire among Thai women with a history of breast cancer. Eur J Oncol Nurs 2018;36:75–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.08.008
doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2018.08.008
Gazibara T, Kovacevic N, Nurkovic S, et al. Menopause-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire: factor and Rasch analytic approach. Climacteric 2019;22:90–96. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1535585
doi: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1535585
Martin CM, Larroy C, Lopez-Picado A, Fernandez-Arias I. Accuracy of the Menopause Rating Scale and the Menopause Quality of Life Questionnaire to discriminate menopausal women with anxiety and depression. Menopause 2019;26:856–862. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001338
doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001338
Papadima E-I, Boutsiadis A, Soldatou A, Ivanidou S, Vassilakou T, Michala L. Linguistic translation and validation of the Menopause-specific Quality of Life (MENQOL) questionnaire in Greek menopausal women. Menopause 2020;27:808–815. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001527
doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001527
Rathnayake N, Alwis G, Lenora J, Mampitiya I, Lekamwasam S. Linguistic and psychometric validation of Sinhala version of Menopause Specific Quality of Life questionnaire. Sri Lanka J Soc Sci 2021;44:15–26. doi: 10.4038/sljss.v44i1.7959
doi: 10.4038/sljss.v44i1.7959
English M, Stoykova B, Slota C, et al. Qualitative study: burden of menopause-associated vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and validation of PROMIS Sleep Disturbance and Sleep-Related Impairment measures for assessment of VMS impact on sleep. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2021;5:37. doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00289-y
doi: 10.1186/s41687-021-00289-y
Hill CD, Fehnel SE, Bobula JD, Yu H, McLeod LD. Development and preliminary validation of the Menopause Symptoms Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (MS-TSQ). Menopause 2007;14:1047–1055. doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31803816b8
doi: 10.1097/gme.0b013e31803816b8
Guttuso T Jr., DiGrazio WJ, Reddy SY. Review of hot flash diaries. Maturitas 2012;71:213–216. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.12.003
doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.12.003