A Master Protocol Template for Pediatric ARDS Studies.

ARDS children clinical trial mechanical ventilation pediatrics

Journal

Respiratory care
ISSN: 1943-3654
Titre abrégé: Respir Care
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7510357

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 1 5 2024
pubmed: 1 5 2024
entrez: 30 4 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Pediatric ARDS is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. High-quality data from clinical trials in children are limited due to numerous barriers to their design and execution. Here we describe the collaborative development of a master protocol as a tool to address some of these barriers and support the conduct of pediatric ARDS studies. Using PubMed, we performed a literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric ARDS to characterize the current state and evaluate potential benefit of harmonized master protocols. We used a multi-stakeholder, collaborative, and team science-oriented process to develop a master protocol template with links to common data elements (CDEs) for pediatric ARDS trials. We identified 11 RCTs that enrolled between 14-200 total subjects per trial. Interventions included mechanical ventilation, prone positioning, corticosteroids, and surfactant. Studies displayed significant heterogeneity in ARDS definition, design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and reported outcomes. Mortality was reported in 91% of trials and ventilator-free days in 73%. The trial heterogeneity made pooled analysis unfeasible. These findings underscore the need for a method to facilitate combined analysis of future trials through standardization of trial elements. As a potential solution, we developed a master protocol, iteratively revised with input from a multidisciplinary panel of experts and organized into 3 categories: instructions and general information, templated language, and a series of text options of common pediatric ARDS trial scenarios. Finally, we linked master protocol sections to relevant CDEs previously defined for pediatric ARDS and captured in a series of electronic case report forms. The majority of pediatric ARDS trials identified were small and heterogeneous in study design and outcome reporting. Using a master protocol template for pediatric ARDS trials with CDEs would support combining and comparing pediatric ARDS trial findings and increase the knowledge base.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Pediatric ARDS is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. High-quality data from clinical trials in children are limited due to numerous barriers to their design and execution. Here we describe the collaborative development of a master protocol as a tool to address some of these barriers and support the conduct of pediatric ARDS studies.
METHODS METHODS
Using PubMed, we performed a literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in pediatric ARDS to characterize the current state and evaluate potential benefit of harmonized master protocols. We used a multi-stakeholder, collaborative, and team science-oriented process to develop a master protocol template with links to common data elements (CDEs) for pediatric ARDS trials.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 11 RCTs that enrolled between 14-200 total subjects per trial. Interventions included mechanical ventilation, prone positioning, corticosteroids, and surfactant. Studies displayed significant heterogeneity in ARDS definition, design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and reported outcomes. Mortality was reported in 91% of trials and ventilator-free days in 73%. The trial heterogeneity made pooled analysis unfeasible. These findings underscore the need for a method to facilitate combined analysis of future trials through standardization of trial elements. As a potential solution, we developed a master protocol, iteratively revised with input from a multidisciplinary panel of experts and organized into 3 categories: instructions and general information, templated language, and a series of text options of common pediatric ARDS trial scenarios. Finally, we linked master protocol sections to relevant CDEs previously defined for pediatric ARDS and captured in a series of electronic case report forms.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The majority of pediatric ARDS trials identified were small and heterogeneous in study design and outcome reporting. Using a master protocol template for pediatric ARDS trials with CDEs would support combining and comparing pediatric ARDS trial findings and increase the knowledge base.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38688543
pii: respcare.11839
doi: 10.4187/respcare.11839
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 by Daedalus Enterprises.

Auteurs

Andrew G Miller (AG)

Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Respiratory Care Services, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina. Andrew.g.miller@duke.edu.

Martha Aq Curley (MA)

Department of Family and Community Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Claire Destrampe (C)

International Children's Advisory Network.

Heidi Flori (H)

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Pediatrics, University of Michigan School Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan.

Robinder Khemani (R)

Clinical Pediatrics, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.

Amy Ohmer (A)

International Children's Advisory Network.

Neal J Thomas (NJ)

Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania; and Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators Network.

Nadir Yehya (N)

Division of Critical Care Medicine, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Shan Ward (S)

Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Leanne West (L)

International Children's Advisory Network.

Kanecia O Zimmerman (KO)

Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

Saranya Venkatachalam (S)

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

Sonya Sutton (S)

Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

Christoph P Hornik (CP)

Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina; and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.

Classifications MeSH