Duet synchronization interventions affect social interactions.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 04 2024
30 04 2024
Historique:
received:
13
11
2023
accepted:
23
04
2024
medline:
1
5
2024
pubmed:
1
5
2024
entrez:
30
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Humans' complex behavior, such as speech, music, or dance, requires us to coordinate our actions with external sounds as well as with social partners. The presence of a partner can influence individuals' synchronization, and, in turn, social connection with the partner may depend on the degree of synchronization. We manipulated the synchronization quality in intervention conditions to address the causal relationship between observed temporal synchrony and perceived social interaction. Pairs of musician and nonmusician participants first performed a turn-taking task consisting of alternating which partner tapped their melody in synchrony with a metronome (each tap generated the next tone in the melody). In two intervention conditions, participants attempted to synchronize their melodies simultaneously with their partner, either with normal auditory feedback (normal feedback) or randomly placed delayed feedback on 25% of melodic tones (delayed feedback). After each intervention, the turn-taking condition was repeated, and participants completed a questionnaire about connectedness, relationship, and feeling of synchronization with their partner. Results showed that partners' mean asynchronies were more negative following the delayed feedback intervention. In addition, nonmusician partners' tapping variability was larger following the delayed feedback intervention when they had the delayed feedback intervention first. Ratings of connectedness, relationship, and feeling of synchronization with their partner were reduced for all participants after the delayed feedback Intervention. We modeled participants' synchronization performance in the post-intervention turn-taking conditions using delay-coupling oscillator models. Reductions in synchronization performance after delayed feedback intervention were reflected in reduced coupling strength. These findings suggest that turn-taking synchronization performance and social connectedness are altered following short interventions that disrupt synchronization with a partner.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38688922
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60485-w
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-60485-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9930Subventions
Organisme : NSERC
ID : 298173
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Schiavio, A., Stupacher, J., Parncutt, R. & Timmers, R. Learning music from each other: Synchronization, turn-taking, or imitation?. Music Percept. 37, 403–422 (2020).
doi: 10.1525/mp.2020.37.5.403
Wilson, M. & Wilson, T. P. An oscillator model of the timing of turn-taking. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 12, 957–968 (2005).
pubmed: 16615316
doi: 10.3758/BF03206432
Ramsey, R., Kaplan, D. M. & Cross, E. S. Watch and learn: The cognitive neuroscience of learning from others’ actions. Trends Neurosci. 44, 478–491 (2021).
pubmed: 33637286
doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2021.01.007
Bégel, V., Demos, A. P., Wang, M. & Palmer, C. Social interaction and rate effects in models of musical synchronization. Front. Psychol. 13, 865536 (2022).
pubmed: 35783789
pmcid: 9242395
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.865536
Zamm, A., Debener, S. & Sebanz, N. The spontaneous emergence of rhythmic coordination in turn taking. Sci. Rep. 13, 1–14 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-18480-6
Zamm, A., Wellman, C. & Palmer, C. Endogenous rhythms influence interpersonal synchrony. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 42, 611–616 (2016).
pubmed: 26820249
doi: 10.1037/xhp0000201
Melton, Z. J., Chaffin, R., Kangas-Dick, K., Marsh, K. L. & Demos, A. P. Does interpersonal liking lead to interpersonal synchrony in musical contexts?. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 76, 460–467 (2023).
doi: 10.1177/17470218221094306
Bégel, V., Seilles, A. & Dalla Bella, S. Rhythm workers: A music-based serious game for training rhythm skills. Music Sci. 1, 14 (2018).
doi: 10.1177/2059204318794369
Repp, B. H. Sensorimotor synchronization and perception of timing: Effects of music training and task experience. Hum. Mov. Sci. 29, 200–213 (2010).
pubmed: 20074825
doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2009.08.002
Scheurich, R., Zamm, A. & Palmer, C. Tapping into rate flexibility: Musical training facilitates synchronization around spontaneous production rates. Front. Psychol. 9, 338513 (2018).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00458
Zatorre, R. J., Chen, J. L. & Penhune, V. B. When the brain plays music: Auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 8, 547–558 (2007).
pubmed: 17585307
doi: 10.1038/nrn2152
Hadley, L. V., Novembre, G., Keller, P. E. & Pickering, M. J. Causal role of motor simulation in turn-taking behavior. J. Neurosci. 35, 16516–16520 (2015).
pubmed: 26674875
pmcid: 4679828
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1850-15.2015
Hawkins, S. & Farrant, C. Influence of turn-taking in musical and spoken activities on empathy and self-esteem of socially vulnerable young teenagers. Front. Psychol. 12, 801574 (2022).
pubmed: 35197885
pmcid: 8859432
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.801574
Zamm, A., Pfordresher, P. Q. & Palmer, C. Temporal coordination in joint music performance: Effects of endogenous rhythms and auditory feedback. Exp. Brain Res. 233, 607–615 (2015).
pubmed: 25399244
doi: 10.1007/s00221-014-4140-5
Finney, S. A. & Palmer, C. Auditory feedback and memory for music performance: Sound evidence for an encoding effect. Mem. Cognit. 31, 51–64 (2003).
pubmed: 12699143
doi: 10.3758/BF03196082
Pfordresher, P. Q. Musical training and the role of auditory feedback during performance. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1252, 171–178 (2012).
pubmed: 22524356
doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06408.x
Pfordresher, P. Q. Auditory feedback in music performance: The role of melodic structure and musical skill. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 31, 1331–1345 (2005).
pubmed: 16366793
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.6.1331
Benoit, C. E. et al. Musically cued gait-training improves both perceptual and motor timing in Parkinson’s disease. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8, 88554 (2014).
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00494
Thomson, J. M., Leong, V. & Goswami, U. Auditory processing interventions and developmental dyslexia: A comparison of phonemic and rhythmic approaches. Read Writ. 26, 139–161 (2013).
doi: 10.1007/s11145-012-9359-6
Hackney, M. E. & Earhart, G. M. Effects of dance on gait and balance in parkinson’s disease: A comparison of partnered and nonpartnered dance movement. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair. 24, 384–392 (2010).
pubmed: 20008820
doi: 10.1177/1545968309353329
Schellenberg, E. G., Corrigall, K. A., Dys, S. P. & Malti, T. Group music training and children’s prosocial skills. PLoS One 10, e0141449 (2015).
pubmed: 26506414
pmcid: 4624672
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141449
Sumanapala, D. K., Walbrin, J., Kirsch, L. P. & Cross, E. S. Neurodevelopmental perspectives on dance learning: Insights from early adolescence and young adulthood. Prog. Brain Res. 237, 243–277 (2018).
pubmed: 29779737
doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2018.03.010
Lumsden, J., Miles, L. K. & Neil Macrae, C. Sync or sink? Interpersonal synchrony impacts self-esteem. Front. Psychol. 5, 108474 (2014).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01064
Tarr, B., Launay, J. & Dunbar, R. I. M. Silent disco: Dancing in synchrony leads to elevated pain thresholds and social closeness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 37, 343–349 (2016).
pubmed: 27540276
pmcid: 4985033
doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2016.02.004
Hove, M. J. & Risen, J. L. It’s all in the timing: Interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Soc. Cogn. 27, 949–960 (2009).
doi: 10.1521/soco.2009.27.6.949
Demos, A. P., Carter, D. J., Wanderley, M. M. & Palmer, C. The unresponsive partner: Roles of social status, auditory feedback, and animacy in coordination of joint music performance. Front. Psychol. 8, 223045 (2017).
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00149
Stephen, D. G., Stepp, N., Dixon, J. A. & Turvey, M. T. Strong anticipation: Sensitivity to long-range correlations in synchronization behavior. Phys. A: Stat. Mech. Appl. 387, 5271–5278 (2008).
doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2008.05.015
Stepp, N. Anticipation in feedback-delayed manual tracking of a chaotic oscillator. Exp. Brain Res. 198, 521–525 (2009).
pubmed: 19609514
pmcid: 3724402
doi: 10.1007/s00221-009-1940-0
Demos, A. P., Layeghi, H., Wanderley, M. M. & Palmer, C. Staying together: A bidirectional delay-coupled approach to joint action. Cogn. Sci. 43, e12766 (2019).
pubmed: 31446664
doi: 10.1111/cogs.12766
Palmer, C. & Demos, A. P. Are we in time? How predictive coding and dynamical systems explain musical synchrony. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 31, 147–153 (2022).
pubmed: 35400858
pmcid: 8988459
doi: 10.1177/09637214211053635
Stepp, N. & Turvey, M. T. On strong anticipation. Cogn. Syst. Res. 11, 148–164 (2010).
pubmed: 20191086
pmcid: 2827858
doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2009.03.003
Palmer, C., Spidle, F., Koopmans, E. & Schubert, P. Ears, heads, and eyes: When singers synchronise. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 72, 2272–2287 (2019).
doi: 10.1177/1747021819833968
Tranchant, P., Scholler, E. & Palmer, C. Endogenous rhythms influence musicians’ and non-musicians’ interpersonal synchrony. Sci. Rep. 12, 1–14 (2022).
doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-16686-2
Roman, I. R., Washburn, A., Large, E. W., Chafe, C. & Fujioka, T. Delayed feedback embedded in perception-action coordination cycles results in anticipation behavior during synchronized rhythmic action: A dynamical systems approach. PLoS Comput. Biol. 15, e1007371 (2019).
pubmed: 31671096
pmcid: 6822724
doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007371
Finney, S. A. FTAP: A Linux-based program for tapping and music experiments. Beh. Res. Meth. Instr. Comp. 33, 65–72 (2001).
doi: 10.3758/BF03195348
Demos, A. P., Chaffin, R., Begosh, K. T., Daniels, J. R. & Marsh, K. L. Rocking to the beat: Effects of music and partner’s movements on spontaneous interpersonal coordination. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 141, 49–53 (2012).
pubmed: 21668129
doi: 10.1037/a0023843
Aron, A., Aron, E. N. & Smollan, D. Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 63, 596–612 (1992).
doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.596
MacHado, J. N. & Matias, F. S. Phase bistability between anticipated and delayed synchronization in neuronal populations. Phys. Rev. E 102, 032412 (2020).
pubmed: 33075861
doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.102.032412
R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing (2023).
Singmann, H., Bolker, B., Westfall, J., Ause, F. & Ben-Shachar, M. S. Afex: Analysis of factorial experiments. R package version 1.3-0 (2023).
Lenth, R. V. Emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.8.9 (2023).
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. M. & Walker, S. C. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, 1–48 (2015).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B. & Christensen, R. H. B. lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. J. Stat. Softw. 82, 1–26 (2017).
doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13
Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P. C. D. & Schielzeth, H. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J. R. Soc. Interface 14, 134 (2017).
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0213
Pfordresher, P. Q. Auditory feedback in music performance: Evidence for a dissociation of sequencing and timing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 29, 949–964 (2003).
pubmed: 14585016
doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.29.5.949
Scheurich, R., Bégel, V., Sahlas, E. & Palmer, C. Stability of neural oscillations supports auditory-motor synchronization. BioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.10.19.563062 (2023).
doi: 10.1101/2023.10.19.563062
Repp, B. H. & Keller, P. E. Adaptation to tempo changes in sensorimotor synchronization: Effects of intention, attention, and awareness. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A 57, 499–521 (2004).
doi: 10.1080/02724980343000369
Basile, C., Lecce, S. & van Vugt, F. T. Synchrony during online encounters affects social affiliation and theory of mind but not empathy. Front. Psychol. 13, 886639 (2022).
pubmed: 36092070
pmcid: 9450704
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.886639