Patient Satisfaction and Healthcare Utilization with the Transition to Virtual Care in a Multidisciplinary Bariatric Program.
Bariatric surgery
Virtual care; Healthcare utilization
Journal
Obesity surgery
ISSN: 1708-0428
Titre abrégé: Obes Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9106714
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2024
30 Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
06
02
2024
accepted:
23
04
2024
revised:
13
04
2024
medline:
1
5
2024
pubmed:
1
5
2024
entrez:
30
4
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The COVID-19 pandemic saw an acceleration in virtual-visits (VV) for healthcare delivery. However, the impact of virtual care in metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) programs is not well described. Appointment data from three time-points: pre-pandemic (1/1/19-3/15/20, n = 19,290), pandemic (3/16/20-10/31/21, n = 29,459) and current-state (11/1/21-12/31/2022, n = 24,270) was retrieved in our multi-hospital ambulatory MBS program. Appointments were grouped by health care provider (HCP) (MD, dietician, and psychologist) and type (VV and in-person). Surveys assessing patient satisfaction were distributed electronically. All pre-op and post-op appointment data was analyzed for the time-points above. Appointment completion rates and patient reported preferences were described. Our data showed an increase in scheduled VV from 0.5% for all HCP visits to 81% during the pandemic and a current VV visit of 77%. The number of completed VV increased for all HCPs, most prominently for dieticians. Parallel to this, the percentage of no-show visits also improved for all HCP, with MDs having the lowest no-show rate currently. Survey data revealed 89% of patients experience added benefits with VV and > 90% reported their VV experience as very good. VV were preferred over in-person visits for psychologists and dietitians (> 61%), but the majority preferred to see MDs in-person (70%). Our findings reveal significant changes in healthcare utilization trends since the transition to virtual care. While overall satisfaction with virtual care is high, most patients prefer in-person visits with MDs. Thus, multi-disciplinary MBS care can be performed effectively using a hybrid model to ensure efficient distribution of resources.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
The COVID-19 pandemic saw an acceleration in virtual-visits (VV) for healthcare delivery. However, the impact of virtual care in metabolic/bariatric surgery (MBS) programs is not well described.
METHODS
METHODS
Appointment data from three time-points: pre-pandemic (1/1/19-3/15/20, n = 19,290), pandemic (3/16/20-10/31/21, n = 29,459) and current-state (11/1/21-12/31/2022, n = 24,270) was retrieved in our multi-hospital ambulatory MBS program. Appointments were grouped by health care provider (HCP) (MD, dietician, and psychologist) and type (VV and in-person). Surveys assessing patient satisfaction were distributed electronically. All pre-op and post-op appointment data was analyzed for the time-points above. Appointment completion rates and patient reported preferences were described.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Our data showed an increase in scheduled VV from 0.5% for all HCP visits to 81% during the pandemic and a current VV visit of 77%. The number of completed VV increased for all HCPs, most prominently for dieticians. Parallel to this, the percentage of no-show visits also improved for all HCP, with MDs having the lowest no-show rate currently. Survey data revealed 89% of patients experience added benefits with VV and > 90% reported their VV experience as very good. VV were preferred over in-person visits for psychologists and dietitians (> 61%), but the majority preferred to see MDs in-person (70%).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Our findings reveal significant changes in healthcare utilization trends since the transition to virtual care. While overall satisfaction with virtual care is high, most patients prefer in-person visits with MDs. Thus, multi-disciplinary MBS care can be performed effectively using a hybrid model to ensure efficient distribution of resources.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38689073
doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07250-0
pii: 10.1007/s11695-024-07250-0
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Références
American Telemedicine Association. ATA’s standardized telehealth terminology and policy language for states on medical practice. Published September 21, 2020. https://www.americantelemed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/ATA-_Medical-Practice-10-5-20.pdf . Accessed 8/3/2023
Gajarawala SN, Pelkowski JN. Telehealth benefits and barriers. J Nurse Pract. 2021;17(2):218–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.013 .
doi: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2020.09.013
pubmed: 33106751
Eberly LA, Kallan MJ, Julien HM, et al. Patient characteristics Associated With Telemedicine Access for Primary and Specialty Ambulatory Care During the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(12):e2031640. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31640 .
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.31640
pubmed: 33372974
pmcid: 7772717
Omboni S, Padwal RS, Alessa T, et al. The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: current evidence and recommendations for the future. Connect Health. 2022;1:7–35. https://doi.org/10.20517/ch.2021.03 .
doi: 10.20517/ch.2021.03
pubmed: 35233563
pmcid: 7612439
Wosik J, Fudim M, Cameron B, et al. Telehealth transformation: COVID-19 and the rise of virtual care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020;27(6):957–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaa067 .
doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa067
pubmed: 32311034
pmcid: 7188147
Yang W, Wang C, Shikora S, et al. Recommendations for metabolic and bariatric surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic from IFSO. Obes Surg. 2020;30(6):2071–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-04578-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04578-1
pubmed: 32291701
pmcid: 7155392
Verhoeff K, Mocanu V, Dang J, et al. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on bariatric surgery in North America: a retrospective analysis of 834,647 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(6):803–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2022.03.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.03.012
pubmed: 35474010
pmcid: 8933967
Mechanick JI, Youdim A, Jones DB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the perioperative nutritional, metabolic, and nonsurgical support of the bariatric surgery patient--2013 update: cosponsored by American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists, The obesity society, and american society for metabolic & bariatric surgery. Obesity. 2013;21(Suppl 1):S1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.20461 .
doi: 10.1002/oby.20461
pubmed: 23529939
Harper J, Madan AK, Ternovits CA, et al. What happens to patients who do not follow-up after bariatric surgery? Amer Surg™. 2007;73(2):181–4. https://doi.org/10.1177/000313480707300219 .
doi: 10.1177/000313480707300219
Chao GF, Ehlers AP, Ellimoottil C, et al. Convergent mixed methods exploration of telehealth in bariatric surgery: maximizing provider resources and access. Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1877–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-020-05059-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05059-1
pubmed: 33111249
Herdes R. Effect of telehealth implementation on an adolescent metabolic and bariatric surgery program. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022;18(9):1161–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2022.05.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.05.014
pubmed: 35753896
Hardy K, Anistratov A, He W, Daeninck F, Gu J, Vergis A. Bariatric patient experience with virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Obes Surg. 2022;32(3):940–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05823-x
Murtha JA, Alagoz E, Breuer CR, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on the postoperative bariatric surgery patient experience. Ann Surg. 2023;277(4):e745. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000005446 .
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005446
pubmed: 35794783
Pizza F, D’Antonio D, Dell’Isola C, et al. Outpatient clinic in obesity care during COVID-19 outbreak: physically far, virtually near. Brief correspondence on a single center experience: cohort study. Obes Surg. 2021;31(8):3869–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05433-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05433-7
pubmed: 33877505
pmcid: 8055477
Pflugeisen BM, Mou J. Patient satisfaction with virtual obstetric care. Matern Child Health J. 2017;21(7):1544–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2284-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2284-1
pubmed: 28176034
Tenforde AS, Borgstrom H, Polich G, et al. Outpatient physical, occupational, and speech therapy synchronous telemedicine: a survey study of patient satisfaction with virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2020;99(11):977–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001571 .
doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000001571
pubmed: 32804713
Buchanan S, Peixoto C, Belanger C, et al. Investigating patient experience, satisfaction, and trust in an integrated virtual care (IVC) model: a cross-sectional survey. Ann Fam Med. 2023;21(4):338–40. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2978 .
doi: 10.1370/afm.2978
pubmed: 36944507
pmcid: 10365871
Bradley LE, Forman EM, Kerrigan SG, et al. Project HELP: a remotely delivered behavioral intervention for weight regain after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):586–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2337-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2337-3
pubmed: 27586525
Baillot A, Boissy P, Tousignant M, et al. Feasibility and effect of in-home physical exercise training delivered via telehealth before bariatric surgery. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(5):529–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X16653511 .
doi: 10.1177/1357633X16653511
pubmed: 27279467
Brown AM, Ardila-Gatas J, Yuan V, et al. The impact of telemedicine adoption on a multidisciplinary bariatric surgery practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. Ann Surg. 2020;272(6):e306–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000004391 .
doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004391
pubmed: 33086326
Hood MM, Corsica J, Bradley L, et al. Managing severe obesity: understanding and improving treatment adherence in bariatric surgery. J Behav Med. 2016;39(6):1092–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-016-9772-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s10865-016-9772-4
pubmed: 27444752
Garb J, Welch G, Zagarins S, et al. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of morbid obesity: a meta-analysis of weight loss outcomes for laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding and laparoscopic gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2009;19:1447–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-009-9927-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s11695-009-9927-2
pubmed: 19655209
Moran B, Frazier T, Brown LS, et al. A Review of the effectiveness of audio-only telemedicine for chronic disease management. Telemed e-Health. 2022;28(9):1280–4. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2021.0285 .
doi: 10.1089/tmj.2021.0285
Duryea EL, Adhikari EH, Ambia A, et al. Comparison between in-person and audio-only virtual prenatal visits and perinatal outcomes. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(4):e215854. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5854 .
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.5854
pubmed: 33852002
pmcid: 8047732