The application of omics technologies for understanding tropical plants-based bioactive compounds in ruminants: a review.
Animal nutrition
Animal production
Cutting-edge
Molecular markers
Ruminants
Journal
Journal of animal science and biotechnology
ISSN: 1674-9782
Titre abrégé: J Anim Sci Biotechnol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101581293
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 May 2024
01 May 2024
Historique:
received:
11
11
2023
accepted:
29
02
2024
medline:
1
5
2024
pubmed:
1
5
2024
entrez:
30
4
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Finding out how diet impacts health and metabolism while concentrating on the functional qualities and bioactive components of food is the crucial scientific objective of nutritional research. The complex relationship between metabolism and nutrition could be investigated with cutting-edge "omics" and bioinformatics techniques. This review paper provides an overview of the use of omics technologies in nutritional research, with a particular emphasis on the new applications of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and genomes in functional and biological activity research on ruminant livestock and products in the tropical regions. A wealth of knowledge has been uncovered regarding the regulation and use of numerous physiological and pathological processes by gene, mRNA, protein, and metabolite expressions under various physiological situations and guidelines. In particular, the components of meat and milk were assessed using omics research utilizing the various methods of transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and genomes. The goal of this review is to use omics technologies-which have been steadily gaining popularity as technological tools-to develop new nutritional, genetic, and leadership strategies to improve animal products and their quality control. We also present an overview of the new applications of omics technologies in cattle production and employ nutriomics and foodomics technologies to investigate the microbes in the rumen ecology. Thus, the application of state-of-the-art omics technology may aid in our understanding of how species and/or breeds adapt, and the sustainability of tropical animal production, in the long run, is becoming increasingly important as a means of mitigating the consequences of climate change.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38689368
doi: 10.1186/s40104-024-01017-4
pii: 10.1186/s40104-024-01017-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Pagination
58Subventions
Organisme : The Program Management Unit Human & Resources Institutional Development Research and Innovation (PMU-B)
ID : PMU no. 660000050309
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Zhang X, Yap Y, Wei D, Chen G, Chen F. Novel omics technologies in nutrition research. Biotechnol Adv. 2008;26:169–76.
pubmed: 18164161
doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.11.002
Mao X, Bassey AP, Sun D, Yang K, Shan K, Li C. Overview of omics applications in elucidating the underlying mechanisms of biochemical and biological factors associated with meat safety and nutrition. J Proteomics. 2023;276:104840.
pubmed: 36758853
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2023.104840
Munekata PE, Pateiro M, Rocchetti G, Domínguez R, Rocha JM, Lorenzo JM. Application of metabolomics to decipher the role of bioactive compounds in plant and animal foods. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2022;46:100851.
doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2022.100851
Dhalaria R, Verma R, Kumar D, Puri S, Tapwal A, Kumar V, et al. Bioactive compounds of edible fruits with their anti-aging properties: a comprehensive review to prolong human life. Antioxidants. 2020;9:1123.
pubmed: 33202871
pmcid: 7698232
doi: 10.3390/antiox9111123
Kovačević DB, Brdar D, Fabečić P, Barba FJ, Lorenzo JM, Putnik P. Strategies to achieve a healthy and balanced diet: Fruits and vegetables as a natural source of bioactive compounds. In: Barba FJ, Putnik P, Kovačević DB, editors. Agri-Food industry strategies for healthy diets and sustainability. Academic Press; 2020. p. 51–88.
Jackman JA, Boyd RD, Elrod CC. Medium-chain fatty acids and monoglycerides as feed additives for pig production: towards gut health improvement and feed pathogen mitigation. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2020;11:44.
doi: 10.1186/s40104-020-00446-1
Ferrocino I, Cocolin L. Current perspectives in food-based studies exploiting multi-omics approaches. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2017;13:10–5.
doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2017.01.002
Eisler MC, Lee MR, Tarlton JF, Martin BG, Beddington J, Dungai JA, et al. Agriculture: steps to sustainable livestock. Nature. 2014;507:32.
pubmed: 24605375
doi: 10.1038/507032a
Wanapat M, Kang S, Polyorach S. Development of feeding systems and strategies of supplementation to enhance rumen fermentation and ruminant production in the tropics. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013;4:32.
doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-32
Tedeschi LO, Muir JP, Naumann HD, Norris AB, Ramírez-Restrepo CA, Mertens-Talcott SU. Nutritional aspects of ecologically relevant phytochemicals in ruminant production. Front Vet Sci. 2021;8:628445.
pubmed: 33748210
pmcid: 7973208
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.628445
Phupaboon S, Matra M, Prommachart R, Totakul P, Supapong C, Wanapat M. Extraction, characterization, and chitosan microencapsulation of bioactive compounds from Cannabis sativa L., Cannabis indica L., and Mitragyna speiosa K. Antioxidants. 2022;11:2103.
pubmed: 36358475
pmcid: 9686816
doi: 10.3390/antiox11112103
Wanapat M, Kang S, Polyorach S. Development of feeding systems and strategies of supplementation to enhance rumen fermentation and ruminant production in the tropics. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2013;4:32.
pubmed: 23981662
pmcid: 3765718
doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-4-32
Patra AK, Saxena J. The effect and mode of action of saponins on the microbial populations and fermentation in the rumen and ruminant production. Nutr Res. 2009;22:204–19.
doi: 10.1017/S0954422409990163
Jayanegara A, Wina E, Takahashi J. Meta-analysis on methane mitigating properties of saponin-rich sources in the rumen: influence of addition levels and plant sources. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014;27:1426–35.
pubmed: 25178294
pmcid: 4150175
doi: 10.5713/ajas.2014.14086
Ampapon T, Phesatcha K, Wanapat M. Effects of phytonutrients on ruminal fermentation, digestibility, and microorganisms in swamp buffaloes. Animals. 2019;9:671.
pubmed: 31514374
pmcid: 6770294
doi: 10.3390/ani9090671
Chanjula P, Wungsintaweekul J, Chiarawipa R, Phesatcha K, Suntara C, Prachumchai R, et al. Effects of supplementing finishing goats with Mitragyna speciosa (Korth) havil leaves powder on growth performance, hematological parameters, carcass composition, and meat quality. Animals. 2022;12:1637.
pubmed: 35804536
pmcid: 9264776
doi: 10.3390/ani12131637
Matra M, Totakul P, Wanapat M. Utilization of dragon fruit waste by-products and non-protein nitrogen source: effects on in vitro rumen fermentation, nutrients degradability and methane production. Livest Sci. 2021;243:104386.
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2020.104386
Matra M, Wanapat M. Phytonutrient pellet supplementation enhanced rumen fermentation efficiency and milk production of lactating Holstein-Friesian crossbred cows. Anim Nutr. 2022;9:119–26.
pubmed: 35573093
doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.12.002
Beserra FJ, Madruga MS, Leite AM, da Silva EMC, Maia EL. Effect of age at slaughter on chemical composition of meat from Moxotó goats and their crosses. Small Rumin Res. 2004;55:77–81.
doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2004.02.002
Smith SB, Kawachi H, Choi CB, Choi C, Wu G, Sawyer J. Cellular regulation of bovine intramuscular adipose tissue development and composition. J Anim Sci. 2009;87:72–82.
doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1340
Álvarez-Rodríguez J, Urrutia O, Lobón S, Ripoll G, Bertolín JR, Joy M. Insights into the role of major bioactive dietary nutrients in lamb meat quality: a review. J Anim Sci Biotechnol. 2022;13:20.
doi: 10.1186/s40104-021-00665-0
Wanapat M. Rumen manipulation to increase the efficient use of local feed resources and productivity of ruminants in the tropics. Asian-australas J Anim Sci. 2000;13:59–67.
Ojo OE, Kreuzer-Redmer S. MicroRNAs in ruminants and their potential role in nutrition and physiology. Vet Sci. 2023;10:57.
pubmed: 36669058
pmcid: 9867202
doi: 10.3390/vetsci10010057
Li S, Wang Q, Lin X, Jin X, Liu L, Wang C, et al. The use of “Omics” in lactation research in dairy cows. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:983.
pubmed: 28475129
pmcid: 5454896
doi: 10.3390/ijms18050983
Rezzi S, Ramadan Z, Fay LB, Kochhar S. Nutritional metabonomics: applications and perspectives. J Proteome Res. 2007;6:513–25.
pubmed: 17269708
doi: 10.1021/pr060522z
Banerjee G, Pal R, Ray AK. Applications of nutrigenomics in animal sectors: a Review. Asian J Anim Vet Adv. 2015;10:489–99.
doi: 10.3923/ajava.2015.489.499
Davis CD, Hord NG. Nutritional “omics” technologies for elucidating the roles of bioactive food components in colon cancer prevention. J Nutr. 2005;135:2694–7.
pubmed: 16251632
doi: 10.1093/jn/135.11.2694
Kato H, Saito K, Kimura T. A perspective on DNA microarray technology in food and nutritional science. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2005;8:516–22.
pubmed: 16079622
doi: 10.1097/01.mco.0000179166.33323.c3
Cohen-Zinder M, Donthu R, Larkin DM, Kumar CG, Rodriguez-Zas SL, Andropolis KE, et al. Multisite haplotype on cattle chromosome 3 is associated with quantitative trait locus effects on lactation traits. Physiol Genomics. 2011;43:1185–97.
pubmed: 21896633
doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00253.2010
Berkowicz EW, Magee DA, Sikora KM, Berry DP, Howard DJ, Mullen MP, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphisms at the imprinted bovine insulin-like growth factor 2 (IGF2) locus are associated with dairy performance in Irish Holstein-Friesian cattle. J Dairy Res. 2011;78:1–8.
pubmed: 20822563
doi: 10.1017/S0022029910000567
Van Binsbergen R, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL. Makeup of the genetic correlation between milk production traits using genome-wide single nucleotide polymorphism information. J Dairy Res. 2012;95:2132–43.
Colombani C, Legarra A, Fritz S, Guillaume F, Croiseau P, Ducrocq V, et al. Application of Bayesian least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and BayesCpi methods for genomic selection in French Holstein and Montbeliarde breeds. J Dairy Res. 2013;96:575–91.
Duchemin S, Bovenhuis H, Stoop WM, Bouwman AC, van Arendonk JAM, Visker MHPW. Genetic correlation between composition of bovine milk fat in winter and summer, and DGAT1 and SCD1 by season interactions. J Dairy Res. 2013;96:592–604.
Visker MHPW, Dibbits BW, Kinders SM, van Valenberg HJF, van Arendonk JAM, Bovenhuis H. Association of bovine β-casein protein variant I with milk production and milk protein composition. Anim Genet. 2010;42:212–8.
pubmed: 24725229
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2010.02106.x
Heck JM, Schennink A, van Valenberg HJ, Bovenhuis H, Visker MH, van Arendonk JA, et al. Effects of milk protein variants on the protein composition of bovine milk. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:1192–202.
pubmed: 19233813
doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1208
Wang J, Li D, Dangott LJ, Wu G. Proteomics and its role in nutrition research. J Nutr. 2006;136:1192–202.
doi: 10.1093/jn/136.7.1759
Reinhardt TA, Lippolis JD. Bovine milk fat globule membrane proteome. J Dairy Res. 2006;73:406–16.
pubmed: 16834814
doi: 10.1017/S0022029906001889
Reinhardt TA, Lippolis JD. Developmental changes in the milk fat globule membrane proteome during the transition from colostrum to milk. J Dairy Res. 2008;91:2307–18.
Senda A, Fukuda K, Ishii T, Urashima T. Changes in the bovine whey proteome during the early lactation period. Anim Sci J. 2011;82:698–706.
pubmed: 21951907
doi: 10.1111/j.1740-0929.2011.00886.x
Hinz K, O’Connor PM, Huppertz T, Ross RP, Kelly AL. Comparison of the principal proteins in bovine, caprine, buffalo, equine and camel milk. J Dairy Res. 2012;79:185–91.
pubmed: 22365180
doi: 10.1017/S0022029912000015
Lu LM, Li QZ, Huang JG, Gao XJ. Proteomic and functional analyses reveal MAPK1 regulates milk protein synthesis. Molecules. 2013;18:263–75.
doi: 10.3390/molecules18010263
Nicholson JK, Lindon JC. Systems biology: Metabonomics. Nature. 2008;455:1054–6.
pubmed: 18948945
doi: 10.1038/4551054a
Boudonck KJ, Mitchell MW, Wulff J, Ryals JA. Characterization of the biochemical variability of bovine milk using metabolomics. Metabolomics. 2009;5:375–86.
doi: 10.1007/s11306-009-0160-8
Sundekilde UK, Poulsen NA, Larsen LB, Bertram HC. Nuclear magnetic resonance metabonomics reveals strong association between milk metabolites and somatic cell count in bovine milk. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:290–9.
pubmed: 23182357
doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5819
Melzer N, Wittenburg D, Hartwig S, Jakubowski S, Kesting U, Willmitzer L, et al. Investigating associations between milk metabolite profiles and milk traits of Holstein cows. J Dairy Sci. 2013;96:1521–34.
pubmed: 23438684
doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5743
Scano P, Murgia A, Pirisi FM, Caboni P. A gas chromatography-mass spectrometry-based metabolomic approach for the characterization of goat milk compared with cow milk. J Dairy Sci. 2014;97:6057–66.
pubmed: 25108860
doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8247
Yang YX, Zheng N, Zhao XW, Zhang YD, Han RW, Yang JH, et al. Metabolomic biomarkers identify differences in milk produced by Holstein cows and other minor dairy animals. J Proteomics. 2016;136:174–82.
pubmed: 26779989
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2015.12.031
Hernández-Castellano LE, Nally JE, Lindahl J, Wanapat M, Alhidary IA, Fangueiro D, et al. Dairy science and health in the tropics: challenges and opportunities for the next decades. Trop Anim Health Prod. 2019;51:1009–17.
pubmed: 30911961
doi: 10.1007/s11250-019-01866-6
Ribeiro DM, Salama AAK, Vitor ACM, Argüello A, Moncau CT, Santos EM, et al. The application of omics in ruminant production: a review in the tropical and sub-tropical animal production context. J Proteomics. 2020;227:103905.
pubmed: 32712373
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2020.103905
Te Pas M, Hoekman A, Smits M. Biomarkers as management tools for industries in the pork production chain. J Chain Netw Sci. 2011;11:155–66.
doi: 10.3920/JCNS2011.Qpork6
Bendixen E, Danielsen M, Hollung K, Gianazza E, Miller I. Farm animal proteomics - a review. J Proteomics. 2011;74:282–93.
pubmed: 21112346
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2010.11.005
de Almeida AM, Bendixen E. Pig proteomics: a review of a species in the crossroad between biomedical and food sciences. J Proteomics. 2012;75:4296–314.
pubmed: 22543283
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2012.04.010
Goldansaz SA, Guo AC, Sajed T, Steele MA, Plastow GS, Wishart DS. Livestock metabolomics and the livestock metabolome: a systematic review. PLoS ONE. 2017;12:e0177675.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177675
Steemburgo T, Martinez JA, Marchetti J, Rosado EL, dos Santos K. Nutrigenetics and Nutrigenomics. In: Heber D, Li Z, Ordovas J, editors. Precision Nutrition: The Science and Promise of Personalized Nutrition and Health. London: Academic Press; 2024. p. 23–42.
Singh V. Current challenges and future implications of exploiting the ‘OMICS’data into nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics for personalized diagnosis and nutrition-based care. Nutrition. 2023;110:112002.
pubmed: 36940623
doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2023.112002
Raqib R, Cravioto A. Nutrition, immunology, and genetics: future perspectives. Nutr Rev. 2009;67:227–36.
doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2009.00244.x
Mutch DM, Wahli W, Williamson G. Nutrigenomics and nutrigenetics: the emerging faces of nutrition. FASEB J. 2005;19:1602–16.
pubmed: 16195369
doi: 10.1096/fj.05-3911rev
Abete I, Navas-Carretero S, Marti A, Martinez JA. Nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics of caloric restriction. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2012;108:323–46.
pubmed: 22656383
doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-398397-8.00013-7
Bionaz M, Osorio J, Loor JJ. Triennial lactation symposium: nutrigenomics in dairy cows: nutrients, transcription factors, and techniques. J Anim Sci. 2015;93:5531–53.
pubmed: 26641164
doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9192
Henderson G, Cox F, Ganesh S, Jonker A, Young W, Janssen PH, et al. Rumen microbial community composition varies with diet and host, but a core microbiome is found across a wide geographical range. Sci Rep. 2015;5:14567.
pubmed: 26449758
pmcid: 4598811
doi: 10.1038/srep14567
Morrin ST, Lane JA, Marotta M, Bode L, Carrington SD, Irwin JA, et al. Bovine colostrum-driven modulation of intestinal epithelial cells for increased commensal colonization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103:2745–58.
pubmed: 30685814
doi: 10.1007/s00253-019-09642-0
Gruninger RJ, Ribeiro GO, Cameron A, McAllister TA. Invited review: application of meta-omics to understand the dynamic nature of the rumen microbiome and how it responds to diet in ruminants. Animal. 2019;13:1843–54.
pubmed: 31062682
doi: 10.1017/S1751731119000752
Santra A, Karim SA. Rumen manipulation to improve animal productivity. Asian-australas J Anim Sci. 2003;16:748–63.
doi: 10.5713/ajas.2003.748
Singh KM, Jakhesara SJ, Koringa PG, Rank DN, Joshi CG. Metagenomic analysis of virulence-associated and antibiotic resistance genes of microbes in rumen of Indian buffalo (Bubalus bubalis). Gene. 2012;507:146–51.
pubmed: 22850272
doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2012.07.037
Duarte ER, Abrão FO, Ribeiro ICO, Vieira EA, Nigri AC, Silva KL, et al. Rumen protozoa of different ages of beef cattle raised in tropical pastures during the dry season. J Appl Anim Res. 2018;46:1457–61.
doi: 10.1080/09712119.2018.1530676
Morgavi DP, Kelly WJ, Janssen PH, Attwood GT. Rumen microbial (meta)genomics and its application to ruminant production. Animal. 2013;7:184–201.
pubmed: 23031271
doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000419
Deusch S, Tilocca B, Camarinha-Silva A, Seifert J. News in livestock research — use of Omics-technologies to study the microbiota in the gastrointestinal tract of farm animals. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015;13:55–63.
pubmed: 26900430
doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2014.12.005
Nathani NM, Patel AK, Dhamannapatil PS, Kothari RK, Singh KM, Joshi CG. Comparative evaluation of rumen metagenome community using qPCR and MGRAST. AMB Express. 2013;3:1–8.
doi: 10.1186/2191-0855-3-55
Zhang RY, Liu YJ, Yin YY, Jin W, Mao SY, Liu JH. Response of rumen microbiota, and metabolic profiles of rumen fluid, liver and serum of goats to high-grain diets. Animal. 2019;13:1855–64.
pubmed: 30614430
doi: 10.1017/S1751731118003671
Denman SE, Fernandez GM, Shinkai T, Mitsumori M, McSweeney CS. Metagenomic analysis of the rumen microbial community following inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analog. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1087.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01087
Kishi LT, de Jesus RB, Pavani CD, Lemos EGM, de Souza JAM. Metagenomic assembly and draft genome sequence of an uncharacterized Prevotella sp. from Nelore rumen. Genome Announc. 2015;3:6–7.
doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00723-15
Al-Masaudi S, El Kaoutari A, Drula E, AlMehdar H, Redwan EM, Lombard V, et al. A metagenomics investigation of carbohydrate-active enzymes along the gastrointestinal tract of Saudi sheep. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:666.
pubmed: 28473812
pmcid: 5397404
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00666
Huws SA, Creevey CJ, Oyama LB, Mizrahi I, Denman SE, Popova M, et al. Addressing global ruminant agricultural challenges through understanding the rumen microbiome: past, present, and future. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:2161.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02161
Grout L, Baker MG, French N, Hales S. A review of potential public health impacts associated with the global dairy sector. GeoHealth. 2020;4:e2019GH000213.
pubmed: 32159049
pmcid: 7017588
doi: 10.1029/2019GH000213
Zhu D, Ma J, Li G, Rillig MC, Zhu YG. Soil plastispheres as hotspots of antibiotic resistance genes and potential pathogens. ISME J. 2022;16:521–32.
pubmed: 34455424
doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01103-9
Patterson SD, Aebersold RH. Proteomics: the first decade and beyond. Nat Genet. 2003;33:311–23.
pubmed: 12610541
doi: 10.1038/ng1106
Gagnaire V, Jardin J, Jan G, Lortal S. Invited review: proteomics of milk and bacteria used in fermented dairy products: from qualitative to quantitative advances. J Dairy Sci. 2009;92:811–25.
pubmed: 19233774
doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1476
Léonil J, Mollé D, Gaucheron F, Arpino P, Guénot P, Maubois JL. Analysis of major bovine milk proteins by on-line high-performance liquid chromatography and electrospray ionization-mass spectrometry. J Le Lait. 1995;75:193–210.
doi: 10.1051/lait:1995314
Ansari R, Sahmani S. Surface stress effects on the free vibration behavior of nanoplates. Int J Eng Sci. 2011;49:1204–15.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2011.06.005
Addis MF, Pisanu S, Ghisaura S, Pagnozzi D, Marogna G, Tanca A, et al. Proteomics and pathway analyses of the milk fat globule in sheep naturally infected by Mycoplasma agalactiae provide indications of the in vivo response of the mammary epithelium to bacterial infection. Infect Immun. 2011;79:3833–45.
pubmed: 21690237
pmcid: 3165467
doi: 10.1128/IAI.00040-11
Mui JG, O’Dea K. Measurement of resistant starch: factors affecting the amount of starch escaping digestion in vitro. Am J Clin Nutr. 1992;56:123–7.
doi: 10.1093/ajcn/56.1.123
Liu Z, Li C, Pryce JE, Rochfort SJ. Comprehensive characterization of dairy cows milk lipids: Phospholipids, sphingolipids, glycolipids and ceramides. J Agric Food Chem. 2020;68:6726–38.
Zhao Y, Yu S, Zhao H, Li L, Li Y, Tu Y, et al. Lipidomic profiling using GC and LC-MS/MS revealed the improved milk quality and lipid composition in dairy cows supplemented with citrus peel extract. Food Res Inter. 2022;161:111767.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111767
Li M, Li Q, Kang S, Cao X, Zheng Y, Wu J, et al. Characterization and comparison of lipids in dairy cows colostrum and mature milk based on UHPLC-QTOF-MS lipidomic. Food Res Int. 2020;136:109490.
pubmed: 32846571
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109490
Rodríguez-Alcalá LM, Fontecha J. Major lipid classes separation of buttermilk, and cows, goats and ewes milk by high performance liquid chromatography with an evaporative light scattering detector focused on the phospholipid fraction. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217:3063–6.
pubmed: 20356599
doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.02.073
Zhang H, Wang L, Zhang Y, Li X, Leng Y, Gong Y, et al. Comparative lipidomic analysis of human, dairy cows and caprine milk. J Food Sci. 2020;41:207–13.
Tao N, Wu S, Kim J, An HJ, Hinde K, Power ML, et al. Evolutionary glycomics: characterization of milk oligosaccharides in primates. Proteome Res. 2011;10:1548–57.
doi: 10.1021/pr1009367
Barile D, Marotta M, Chu C, Mehra R, Grimm R, Lebrilla CB, et al. Neutral and acidic oligosaccharides in Holstein-Friesian colostrum during the first 3 days of lactation measured by high performance liquid chromatography on a microfluidic chip and time-of-flight mass spectrometry. J Dairy Sci. 2010;93:3940–9.
pubmed: 20723667
pmcid: 3951277
doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3156
Fong B, Ma K, McJarrow P. Quantification of dairy cows milk oligosaccharides using liquid chromatography-selected reaction monitoring-mass spectrometry. J Agric Food Chem. 2011;59:9788–95.
pubmed: 21790206
doi: 10.1021/jf202035m
Mariño K, Lane JA, Abrahams JL, Struwe WB, Harvey DJ, Marotta M, et al. Method for milk oligosaccharide profiling by 2-aminobenzamide labeling and hydrophilic interaction chromatography. Glycobiology. 2011;21:1317–30.
pubmed: 21566017
doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwr067
Lu J, Zhang Y, Song B, Zhang S, Pang X, Sari RN, et al. Comparative analysis of oligosaccharides in Guanzhong and Saanen goat milk by using LC–MS/MS. Carbohydr Polym. 2020;235:115965.
pubmed: 32122499
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.115965
Tao N, DePeters EJ, Freeman S, German JB, Grimm R, Lebrilla CB. Bovine milk glycome. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91:3768–78.
pubmed: 18832198
doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-1305
Karunanithi D, Radhakrishna A, Sivaraman KP, Biju VMN. Quantitative determination of melatonin in milk by LC-MS/MS. J Food Sci Technol. 2014;51:805–12.
pubmed: 24741180
doi: 10.1007/s13197-013-1221-6
Loveday SM, Fraser K, Luo D, Weeks M, Cakebread JA. A multivariate snapshot of New Zealand milk seasonality in individual cows. Int Dairy J. 2021;114:104940.99.
doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2020.104940
Tan BC, Lim YS, Lau SE. Proteomics in commercial crops: An overview. J Proteomics. 2017;169:176–88.
pubmed: 28546092
doi: 10.1016/j.jprot.2017.05.018
Pogorzelska-Nowicka E, Atanasov AG, Horbańczuk J, Wierzbicka A. Bioactive compounds in functional meat products. Molecules. 2018;23:307.
pubmed: 29385097
pmcid: 6017222
doi: 10.3390/molecules23020307
Al-Dobaib SN, Mousa HM. Benefits and risks of growth promoters in animal production. J Food Agric Environ. 2009;7:202–8.
Taheri-Garavand A, Fatahi S, Omid M, Makino Y. Meat quality evaluation based on computer vision technique: a review. Meat Sci. 2019;156:183–95.
pubmed: 31202093
doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.06.002
Gagaoua M. Recent advances in OMICs technologies and application for ensuring meat quality. Safety and Authenticity Foods. 2022;11:2532.
pubmed: 36010532
Munekata PE, Pateiro M, López-Pedrouso M, Gagaoua M, Lorenzo JM. Foodomics in meat quality. Curr Opin Food Sci. 2021;38:79–85.
doi: 10.1016/j.cofs.2020.10.003
Bevilacqua M, Bro R, Marini F, Rinnan Å, Rasmussen MA, Skov T. Recent chemometrics advances for foodomics. TrAC Trends Anal Chem. 2017;96:42–51.
doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2017.08.011
Hara A, Radin NS. Lipid extraction of tissues with low-toxicity solvent. Anal Biochem. 1978;90:420–6.
pubmed: 727482
doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90046-5
Barido FH, Utama DT, Jong HS, Kim J, Lee CW, Park YS, et al. The effect of finishing diet supplemented with methionine/lysine and methionine/α-tocopherol on performance, carcass traits and meat quality of Hanwoo steers. Asian-australas J Anim Sci. 2020;33:69.
pubmed: 31480172
doi: 10.5713/ajas.19.0209
National Research Council (NRC). Nutrient requirements of beef cattle. 7th revised edition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000.
Kristensen L, Purslow PP. The effect of ageing on the waterholding capacity of pork role of cytoskeletal proteins. Meat Sci. 2001;58:17–23.
pubmed: 22061914
doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(00)00125-X
Lamas A, Regal P, Vázquez B, Miranda JM, Franco CM, Cepeda A. Transcriptomics: a powerful tool to evaluate the behavior of foodborne pathogens in the food production chain. Food Res Int. 2019;125:108543.
pubmed: 31554082
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108543
Gagaoua M, Monteils V, Couvreur S, Picard B. Identification of biomarkers associated with the rearing practices, carcass characteristics, and beef quality: An integrative approach. J Agric Food Chem. 2017;65:8264–78.
pubmed: 28844145
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03239
Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.
pubmed: 942051
doi: 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
Gagaoua M, Terlouw C, Richardson I, Hocquette JF, Picard B. The associations between proteomic biomarkers and beef tenderness depend on the end-point cooking temperature, the country origin of the panelists and breed. Meat Sci. 2019;157:107871.
pubmed: 31254803
doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.06.007
Newbold CJ, Ramos-Morales E. Review: Ruminal microbiome and microbial metabolome: effects of diet and ruminant host. Animal. 2020;14:78–86.
doi: 10.1017/S1751731119003252
Danielsson R, Dicksved J, Sun L, Gonda H, Müller B, Schnürer A, Bertilsson J. Methane production in dairy cows correlates with rumen methanogenic and bacterial community structure. Front Microbiol. 2017;8:226.
pubmed: 28261182
pmcid: 5313486
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00226
Caro D, Kebreab E, Mitloehner FM. Mitigation of enteric methane emissions from global livestock systems through nutrition strategies. Clim Change. 2016;137:467–80.
doi: 10.1007/s10584-016-1686-1
Kumar S, Choudhury PK, Carro MD, Griffith GW, Dagar SS, Puniya M, et al. New aspects and strategies for methane mitigation from ruminants. Appl Microbiol. 2014;98:31–44.
González-Recio O, López-Paredes J, Ouatahar L, Charfeddine N, Ugarte E, Alenda R, et al. Mitigation of greenhouse gases in dairy cattle via genetic selection: 2. Incorporating methane emissions into the breeding goal. J Dairy Sci. 2020;103:7210–21.
pubmed: 32475662
doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17598
Attwood GT, Kelly WJ, Altermann EH, Moon CD, Leahy S, Cookson AL. Application of rumen microbial genome information to livestock systems in the postgenomic era. Aust J Exp Agric. 2008;48:695–700.
doi: 10.1071/EA07408
Te Pas MF, Madsen O, Calus MP, Smits MA. The importance of endophenotypes to evaluate the relationship between genotype and external phenotype. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18:2.