Air-polishing followed by ultrasonic calculus removal for the treatment of gingivitis: A 12-month, split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial.
air‐polishing
dental biofilm
gingivitis
oral hygiene
plaque disclosing
Journal
International journal of dental hygiene
ISSN: 1601-5037
Titre abrégé: Int J Dent Hyg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101168070
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 Apr 2024
30 Apr 2024
Historique:
revised:
06
04
2024
received:
23
01
2023
accepted:
08
04
2024
medline:
1
5
2024
pubmed:
1
5
2024
entrez:
1
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To evaluate the advantages of a novel protocol involving full-mouth erythritol-powder air-polishing followed by ultrasonic calculus removal in the maintenance of patients treated for gingivitis, with a focus on time and comfort. Systemically healthy patients with gingivitis were selected. Following a split-mouth design, quadrants 1-4 and 2-3 were randomly allocated to receive air-polishing followed by ultrasonic calculus removal following a protocol known as Guided Biofilm Therapy (GBT) or traditional full-mouth ultrasonic debridement followed by polishing with a rubber cup and prophylactic paste (US + P). Bleeding on probing (BoP) and the plaque index (PI) were collected at baseline (T0), 2 weeks (T1), 4 weeks (T2), 3 months (T3), and 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5). Following the same randomization, prophylactic therapy was provided at 3 months (T3) and 6 months (T4). Clinical parameters, treatment time and patient comfort and satisfaction were evaluated. A total of 41 patients were selected, 39 completed the study. The clinical parameters were clinically satisfactory for both treatments at every time. At 4 months after treatment, GBT maintained significantly lower BoP and PI. GBT protocol required a significantly lower treatment time, especially at T3 and T4, when it saved 24.5% and 25.1% of the time, respectively. Both treatments were rated positively by most patients. However, GBT was perceived as more comfortable, and a higher number of patients preferred it. No significant difference was observed between GBT and conventional ultrasonic debridement and rubber cup polishing in terms of BoP and PI levels. The GBT protocol allowed less time expenditure and higher patients' perceived comfort.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Références
Jepsen S, Blanco J, Eaton KA, et al. Prevention and control of dental caries and periodontal diseases at individual and population level : consensus report of group 3 of joint EFP/ORCA workshop on the boundaries between caries and periodontal diseases. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44:S85‐S93. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12687
Camboni S, Donnet M. Tooth surface comparison after air polishing and rubber cup: a scanning electron microscopy study. J Clin Dent. 2016;27(1):13‐18.
Kim SY, Kang MK, Kang SM, Kim HE. Effects of ultrasonic instrumentation on enamel surfaces with various defects. Int J Dent Hyg. 2018;16(2):219‐224. doi:10.1111/idh.12339
Arefnia B, Koller M, Wimmer G, Lussi A, Haas M. In vitro study of surface changes induced on enamel and cementum by different scaling and polishing techniques. Oral Health Prev Dent. 2021;19(1):85‐92. doi:10.3290/j.ohpd.b927695
Figuero E, Herrera D, Joana C. Mechanical and chemical plaque control in the simultaneous management of gingivitis and caries: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2017;44:S116‐S134. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12674
Lamont T, Worthington HV, Clarkson JE, Beirne PV. Routine scale and polish for periodontal health in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;2018(12):CD004625. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004625.pub5
Frame PS, Sawai R, Bowen WH, Meyerowitz C. Preventive dentistry: Practitioners’ recommendations for low‐risk patients compared with scientific evidence and practice guidelines. Am J Prev Med. 2000;18(2):159‐162.
Needleman I, Nibali L, Di Iorio A, et al. Professional mechanical plaque removal for prevention of periodontal diseases in adults – systematic review update. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(S16):S12‐S35. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12341
Mensi M, Scotti E, Sordillo A, Dalè M, Calza S. Clinical evaluation of air polishing with erythritol powder followed by ultrasonic calculus removal versus conventional ultrasonic debridement and rubber cup polishing for the treatment of gingivitis: a split‐mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2022;20(2):371‐380. doi:10.1111/idh.12537
Vouros I, Antonoglou GN, Anoixiadou S, Kalfas S. A novel biofilm removal approach (guided biofilm therapy) utilizing erythritol air‐polishing and ultrasonic piezo instrumentation: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Dent Hyg. 2022;20(2):381‐390. doi:10.1111/idh.12533
Shrivastava D, Natoli V, Srivastava KC, et al. Novel approach to dental biofilm management through guided biofilm therapy (GBT): a review. Microorganisms. 2021;9(9):1966. doi:10.3390/microorganisms9091966
Fägerstad A, Windahl J, Arnrup K. Understanding avoidance and non‐attendance among adoles‐cents in dental care‐an integrative review. Community Dent Health. 2016;33:195‐207. doi:10.1922/CDH_3829Fägerstad13
Listl S, Frühauf N, Dannewitz B, et al. Cost‐effectiveness of non‐surgical peri‐implantitis treatments. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42(5):470‐477. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12402
Fu JH, Wong LB, Huei‐Jinntong SYF. Conventional versus comprehensive dental prophylaxis: comparing the clinical outcomes between rubber cup and air polishing and the importance of plaque disclosure. Quintessence Int. 2021;52(3):264‐274. doi:10.3290/j.qi.a45602
Park B, Kim M, Park J, Jeong J‐H, Noh H. Research on dental plaque removal methods for efficient oral prophylaxis: with a focus on air polishing and rubber cup polishing. Int J Dent Hyg. 2021;19(3):255‐261. doi:10.1111/idh.12481
O'Leary TJ, Drake RB, Naylor JE. The plaque control record. J Periodontol. 1972;43(1):38. doi:10.1902/jop.1972.43.1.38
Löe H, Silness J. Periodontal disease in pregnancy I. Prevalence and severity. Acta Odontol Scand. 1963;21:533‐551.
Wolgin M, Frankenhauser A, Shakavets N, Bastendorf KD, Lussi A, Kielbassa AM. A randomized controlled trial on the plaque‐removing efficacy of a low‐abrasive air‐polishing system to improve oral health care. Quintessence Int (Berl). 2021;52(9):752‐762. doi:10.3290/j.qi.b1763661
Trombelli L, Farina R, Silva CO, Tatakis DN. Plaque‐induced gingivitis: Case definition and diagnostic considerations. J Periodontol. 2018;89:46‐73. doi:10.1002/JPER.17-0576
Schwendicke F, Stolpe M, Plaumann A, Graetz C. Cost‐effectiveness of regular versus irregular supportive periodontal therapy or tooth removal. J Clin Periodontol. 2016;43(11):940‐947. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12595
Buchholz GE, Eber W, Fedderwitz J. Der Geschäftsbericht Umfasst Den Zeitraum ‐ KZBV. 2013.
Miremadi SR, de Bruyn H, Steyaert H, Princen K, Sabzevar MM, Cosyn J. A randomized controlled trial on immediate surgery versus root planing in patients with advanced periodontal disease: a cost‐effectiveness analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41(2):164‐171. doi:10.1111/jcpe.12201
Taylor G. Modernising NHS dentistry‐implementing the NHS plan. Community Dent Health. 2000;17(4):207‐209. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.4813421
Tan SL, Grewal GK, Mohamed Nazari NS, Mohd‐Dom TN, Baharuddin NA. Efficacy of air polishing in comparison with hand instruments and/or power‐driven instruments in supportive periodontal therapy and implant maintenance: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22(1):85. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02120-6