Immunophenotyping in routine clinical practice for predicting treatment response and adverse events in patients with MS.

DMD MS T cells immunophenotyping treatment

Journal

Frontiers in neurology
ISSN: 1664-2295
Titre abrégé: Front Neurol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101546899

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 20 02 2024
accepted: 03 04 2024
medline: 1 5 2024
pubmed: 1 5 2024
entrez: 1 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Recent studies proposed cellular immunoprofiling as a surrogate for predicting treatment response and/or stratifying the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). However, applicability in real-world circumstances is not sufficiently addressed. We aimed to explore whether standard routine clinical leukocyte phenotyping before treatment initiation could help stratify patients according to treatment response or AEs in a real-world MS cohort. In this retrospective study, 150 pwMS were included, who had been newly initiated on a disease-modifying drug (DMD) and had been assessed for standard immunophenotyping before DMD initiation (baseline) and at least once during the following year. Multivariate models were used to assess an association of immune subsets and the association between immune cell profiles regarding treatment response and AEs. We found that the composition of T cell subsets was associated with relapse activity, as an increased proportion of CD8 Immune cell profiles are associated with treatment response and the occurrence of AEs in pwMS. Hence, immunophenotyping may serve as a valuable biomarker to enable individually tailored treatment strategies in pwMS.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Recent studies proposed cellular immunoprofiling as a surrogate for predicting treatment response and/or stratifying the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). However, applicability in real-world circumstances is not sufficiently addressed.
Objective UNASSIGNED
We aimed to explore whether standard routine clinical leukocyte phenotyping before treatment initiation could help stratify patients according to treatment response or AEs in a real-world MS cohort.
Methods UNASSIGNED
In this retrospective study, 150 pwMS were included, who had been newly initiated on a disease-modifying drug (DMD) and had been assessed for standard immunophenotyping before DMD initiation (baseline) and at least once during the following year. Multivariate models were used to assess an association of immune subsets and the association between immune cell profiles regarding treatment response and AEs.
Results UNASSIGNED
We found that the composition of T cell subsets was associated with relapse activity, as an increased proportion of CD8
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Immune cell profiles are associated with treatment response and the occurrence of AEs in pwMS. Hence, immunophenotyping may serve as a valuable biomarker to enable individually tailored treatment strategies in pwMS.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38689880
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1388941
pmc: PMC11058637
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1388941

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Zrzavy, Rieder, Wuketich, Thalhammer, Haslacher, Altmann, Kornek, Krajnc, Monschein, Schmied, Zebenholzer, Zulehner, Berger, Rommer, Leutmezer and Bsteh.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

TZ has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. HH reports grants from Glock Health Science and Research, BlueSky Immunotherapies, Neutrolis, Clickmer, Janssen-Cilag, the Austrian Federal Ministry for Education Science and Research, as well as from the Austrian Federal Ministry for Defense and Sports, all outside of the submitted work. PA has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting from Biogen. He received a research grant from Quanterix International and was awarded a combined sponsorship from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Roche, and Teva for a clinical study. BK has received honoraria for speaking and for consulting from Biogen, BMSCelgene, Johnson&Johnson, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Teva and Sanofi-Genzyme outside of the submitted work. No conflict of interest with respect to the present study. NK has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from BMS/Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Genzyme and held a grant for a Multiple Sclerosis Clinical Training Fellowship Programme from the European Committee for Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS). TM has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. KZ received speaking honoraria or travel grants from Biogen, Novartis and Sanofi-Genzyme. GZ has participated in meetings sponsored by or received travel funding from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. TB has participated in meetings sponsored by and received honoraria (lectures, advisory boards, consultations) from pharmaceutical companies marketing treatments for MS: Allergan, Bayer, Biogen, Bionorica, BMS/Celgene, Genesis, GSK, GW/Jazz Pharma, Horizon, Janssen-Cilag, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and UCB. His institution has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Biogen, Bayer, BMS/Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva) and for participation in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis sponsored by Alexion, Bayer, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Octapharma, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva. PR has received honoraria for consultancy/speaking from AbbVie, Allmiral, Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi Genzyme, has received research grants from Amicus, Biogen, Merck, Roche. FL has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Actelion, Almirall, Biogen, Celgene, Johnson&Johnson, MedDay, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. GB has participated in meetings sponsored by, received speaker honoraria or travel funding from Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, and received honoraria for consulting Biogen, Celgene/BMS, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva. He has received financial support in the past 12 months by unrestricted research grants (Celgene/BMS, Novartis). The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Tobias Zrzavy (T)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Kerstin Rieder (K)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Viktoria Wuketich (V)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Renate Thalhammer (R)

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Helmuth Haslacher (H)

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Patrick Altmann (P)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Barbara Kornek (B)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Nik Krajnc (N)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Tobias Monschein (T)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Christiane Schmied (C)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Karin Zebenholzer (K)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Gudrun Zulehner (G)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Thomas Berger (T)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Paulus Rommer (P)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Fritz Leutmezer (F)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Gabriel Bsteh (G)

Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Comprehensive Center for Clinical Neurosciences and Mental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.

Classifications MeSH