Techniques for abductor reattachment in proximal femoral replacement for non-oncological reconstructions: a narrative review.

Abductor mechanism abductor reattachment gluteus medius proximal femoral replacement proximal femur megaprostheses

Journal

Annals of joint
ISSN: 2415-6809
Titre abrégé: Ann Jt
Pays: China
ID NLM: 101711195

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 10 03 2023
accepted: 10 10 2023
medline: 1 5 2024
pubmed: 1 5 2024
entrez: 1 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Proximal femoral replacement due to revision hip arthroplasty or catastrophic proximal femur fracture fixation failures with considerable proximal femur bone loss can lead to a substantial loss of function of the soft tissue around the hip and the abductor muscles in particular. Surgical techniques of gluteus medius repair and/or abductor mechanism reattachment/reconstruction are widely debated in the literature, but it is quite rarely dealt with in the context of megaprosthesis and femoral reconstruction, particularly in non-oncologic patients. The aim of this study is to present a narrative review of the literature on techniques for abductor reattachment in proximal femoral replacement for non-oncological reconstructions. MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched by two researchers independently from inception until February 1st, 2023 (923 for MEDLINE and 963 for Embase; Cochrane is a composite of multiple databases and thus does not report a standard inception date). Articles examining proximal femoral reconstruction with megaprosthesis or allograft prosthesis were included. Studies concerning cadaver and oncologic patients were excluded. If the researchers failed to find an agreement on whether to include a study, the senior researcher would make a final decision in such cases. Data were extracted and stored, and qualitative synthesis was performed. A total of 1,157 articles from MEDLINE, 11,187 articles from Embase, and 0 articles from Cochrane were identified. Of 12,344 articles, the structured screening process revealed 10 eligible trials. Four different types of abductor musculature reconstruction/reinsertion were identified. Multiple and complex revision hip arthroplasties as well as multiple surgical procedures for proximal femur fracture fixations failures may have a great impact on proximal femur bone stock condition and soft tissue preservation requiring the use of a proximal femur megaprosthesis. In such cases, the abductor mechanism reconstruction and/or reattachment is achievable with different techniques that can be resumed in four different groups: direct suture to the prosthesis, trochanteric sleeve osteotomy, muscle-to-muscle suture, and synthetic tube augmentation suture.

Sections du résumé

Background and Objective UNASSIGNED
Proximal femoral replacement due to revision hip arthroplasty or catastrophic proximal femur fracture fixation failures with considerable proximal femur bone loss can lead to a substantial loss of function of the soft tissue around the hip and the abductor muscles in particular. Surgical techniques of gluteus medius repair and/or abductor mechanism reattachment/reconstruction are widely debated in the literature, but it is quite rarely dealt with in the context of megaprosthesis and femoral reconstruction, particularly in non-oncologic patients. The aim of this study is to present a narrative review of the literature on techniques for abductor reattachment in proximal femoral replacement for non-oncological reconstructions.
Methods UNASSIGNED
MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched by two researchers independently from inception until February 1st, 2023 (923 for MEDLINE and 963 for Embase; Cochrane is a composite of multiple databases and thus does not report a standard inception date). Articles examining proximal femoral reconstruction with megaprosthesis or allograft prosthesis were included. Studies concerning cadaver and oncologic patients were excluded. If the researchers failed to find an agreement on whether to include a study, the senior researcher would make a final decision in such cases. Data were extracted and stored, and qualitative synthesis was performed.
Key Content and Findings UNASSIGNED
A total of 1,157 articles from MEDLINE, 11,187 articles from Embase, and 0 articles from Cochrane were identified. Of 12,344 articles, the structured screening process revealed 10 eligible trials. Four different types of abductor musculature reconstruction/reinsertion were identified.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
Multiple and complex revision hip arthroplasties as well as multiple surgical procedures for proximal femur fracture fixations failures may have a great impact on proximal femur bone stock condition and soft tissue preservation requiring the use of a proximal femur megaprosthesis. In such cases, the abductor mechanism reconstruction and/or reattachment is achievable with different techniques that can be resumed in four different groups: direct suture to the prosthesis, trochanteric sleeve osteotomy, muscle-to-muscle suture, and synthetic tube augmentation suture.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38690077
doi: 10.21037/aoj-23-26
pii: aoj-09-20
pmc: PMC11058535
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Review

Langues

eng

Pagination

20

Informations de copyright

2024 Annals of Joint. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://aoj.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/aoj-23-26/coif). The series “Modular Implants for Revision Arthroplasty in Orthopedics” was commissioned by the editorial office without any funding or sponsorship. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Auteurs

Matteo Innocenti (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Filippo Leggieri (F)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Davide Stimolo (D)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Mattia Carminati (M)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Carulli Christian (C)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Roberto Civinini (R)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Classifications MeSH