Pericardial effusion requiring intervention in patients undergoing leadless pacemaker implantation: A real-world analysis from the National Inpatient Sample database.

Leadless pacemakers Outcomes Pericardial effusion Predictors

Journal

Heart rhythm O2
ISSN: 2666-5018
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm O2
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101768511

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
medline: 1 5 2024
pubmed: 1 5 2024
entrez: 1 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Pericardial effusion requiring percutaneous or surgical-based intervention remains an important complication of a leadless pacemaker implantation. The study sought to determine real-world prevalence, risk factors, and associated outcomes of pericardial effusion requiring intervention in leadless pacemaker implantations. The National Inpatient Sample and International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantations during the years 2016 to 2020. The outcomes assessed in our study included prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention, other procedural complications, and in-hospital outcomes. Predictors of pericardial effusion were also analyzed. Pericardial effusion requiring intervention occurred in a total of 325 (1.1%) leadless pacemaker implantations. Patient-level characteristics that predicted development of a serious pericardial effusion included >75 years of age (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.75), female sex (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.62-2.55), coagulopathy (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12-1.99), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.74), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22-1.94), and connective tissue disorders (OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.02-4.39). Pericardial effusion requiring intervention was independently associated with mortality (OR 5.66, 95% CI 4.24-7.56), prolonged length of stay (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.73), and increased cost of hospitalization (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.92-3.21) after leadless pacemaker implantation. In a large, contemporary, real-world cohort of leadless pacemaker implantations in the United States, the prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention was 1.1%. Certain important patient-level characteristics predicted development of a significant pericardial effusion, and such effusions were associated with adverse outcomes after leadless pacemaker implantations.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Pericardial effusion requiring percutaneous or surgical-based intervention remains an important complication of a leadless pacemaker implantation.
Objective UNASSIGNED
The study sought to determine real-world prevalence, risk factors, and associated outcomes of pericardial effusion requiring intervention in leadless pacemaker implantations.
Methods UNASSIGNED
The National Inpatient Sample and International Classification of Diseases-Tenth Revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent leadless pacemaker implantations during the years 2016 to 2020. The outcomes assessed in our study included prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention, other procedural complications, and in-hospital outcomes. Predictors of pericardial effusion were also analyzed.
Results UNASSIGNED
Pericardial effusion requiring intervention occurred in a total of 325 (1.1%) leadless pacemaker implantations. Patient-level characteristics that predicted development of a serious pericardial effusion included >75 years of age (odds ratio [OR] 1.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.75), female sex (OR 2.03, 95% CI 1.62-2.55), coagulopathy (OR 1.50, 95% CI 1.12-1.99), chronic pulmonary disease (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.74), chronic kidney disease (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.22-1.94), and connective tissue disorders (OR 2.98, 95% CI 2.02-4.39). Pericardial effusion requiring intervention was independently associated with mortality (OR 5.66, 95% CI 4.24-7.56), prolonged length of stay (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.07-1.73), and increased cost of hospitalization (OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.92-3.21) after leadless pacemaker implantation.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
In a large, contemporary, real-world cohort of leadless pacemaker implantations in the United States, the prevalence of pericardial effusion requiring intervention was 1.1%. Certain important patient-level characteristics predicted development of a significant pericardial effusion, and such effusions were associated with adverse outcomes after leadless pacemaker implantations.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38690142
doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.02.004
pii: S2666-5018(24)00030-8
pmc: PMC11056447
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

217-223

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Muhammad Zia Khan (MZ)

Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Yasar Sattar (Y)

Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Waleed Alruwaili (W)

Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Sameh Nassar (S)

Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Mohamed Alhajji (M)

Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Bandar Alyami (B)

Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Amanda T Nguyen (AT)

Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.

Joseph Neely (J)

Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.

Zain Ul Abideen Asad (ZU)

Division of Cardiology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Siddharth Agarwal (S)

Division of Cardiology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

Sameer Raina (S)

Division of Cardiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Sudarshan Balla (S)

Division of Cardiology, West Virginia University Heart and Vascular Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia.

Bao Nguyen (B)

Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.

Dali Fan (D)

Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.

Douglas Darden (D)

Division of Cardiology, Kansas City Heart Rhythm Institute, Overland Park, Kansas.

Muhammad Bilal Munir (MB)

Section of Electrophysiology, Division of Cardiology, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California.

Classifications MeSH