Chewing efficiency and contact area discrepancies in Angle's class I and II malocclusion: A comparative study.

Chewing efficiency Dental morphology Malocclusion Mastication North africa Occlusion Tunisia

Journal

The Saudi dental journal
ISSN: 1013-9052
Titre abrégé: Saudi Dent J
Pays: Saudi Arabia
ID NLM: 9313603

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 05 10 2023
revised: 22 12 2023
accepted: 25 12 2023
medline: 1 5 2024
pubmed: 1 5 2024
entrez: 1 5 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The study aimed to assess and compare both the chewing efficiency and the contact area between class I and class II of Angle's malocclusions. A total of 120 individuals aged between 19 and 30 years were examined and were divided into two groups according to Angle's class (Class I and class II). The chewing efficiency was quantified using the ViewGum software and two-colored chewing gum. The contact area was quantified using modeling wax and MATLAB software. All data were collected, then, analyzed using SPSS software 21. Data normality was checked through kurtosis test. Descriptive results were calculated. Matched sample t-tests were used to compare chewing efficiency measurements between right and left sides. Independent t-tests were used to compare chewing efficiency and the contact area between class I and class II of Angle's malocclusions. Linear regression and Pearson correlation were used to assess the correlation between chewing efficiency and the contact area. The significance level was fixed at p = 0.05. For group 1, the mean hue value on both sides was 0.086 ± 0.058. For group 2, it was 0.095 ± 0.055. The difference between both groups was statistically significant (p = 0.03). For group 1, the mean contact area was 49.91 ± 21.47 mm The Chewing is better for patients with Angle's Class I malocclusion. The contact area is higher. Larger occlusal contact area leads to higher masticatory efficiency. Further studies should be conducted.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38690385
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.12.016
pii: S1013-9052(23)00280-8
pmc: PMC11056408
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

633-637

Informations de copyright

© 2023 THE AUTHORS.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Ahmed Hamdi (A)

Faculty of Dental Medicine Monastir Tunisia; University of Monastir.

Rim Kallala (R)

Faculty of Dental Medicine Monastir Tunisia, University of Monastir, Department of Fixed Prosthodontics, Laboratory of Dental Anatomy, Research Laboratory of Occlusodontics and Ceramic Prostheses LR16ES15, 5000 Monastir, Tunisia.

Belhassen Harzallah (B)

Faculty of dental Medicine Monastir Tunisia, University of Monastir, Department of fixed prosthodontics, Research laboratory of Occlusodontics and Ceramic Prostheses LR16ES15, 5000, Monastir, Tunisia.

Classifications MeSH