A non-invasive tool to collect small intestine content in post weaning pigs: validation study.
Journal
Scientific reports
ISSN: 2045-2322
Titre abrégé: Sci Rep
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101563288
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
30 04 2024
30 04 2024
Historique:
received:
30
11
2023
accepted:
17
04
2024
medline:
2
5
2024
pubmed:
2
5
2024
entrez:
1
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
The Capsule for Sampling (CapSa) is an ingestible capsule that collects small intestine content while transiting through the natural digestive pathway. In this study, 14 Swiss Large White pigs weighing less than 12 kg (Category < 12 kg) and 12 weighing between 12 and 20 kg (Category [12-20 kg]) were given two CapSas and monitored for three days. The animals were euthanized for post-mortem sampling, allowing us to directly obtain gut microbiota samples from the gastrointestinal tract. This post-mortem approach enabled a direct comparison between the microbial content from the gut and the samples collected via the CapSas, and it also facilitated precise identification of the CapSas' sampling sites within the gastrointestinal tract. For the category under 12 kg, only 2.3% of the administered CapSas were recovered from the feces. In contrast, in the 12-20 kg category, 62.5% of the CapSas were successfully retrieved from the feces within 48 h. Of these recovered CapSas, 73.3%-equating to 11 capsules from eight pigs-had a pH > 5.5 and were therefore selected for microbiome analysis. Bacterial composition of the CapSas was compared with that of the three segments of the small intestine, the large intestine and feces of the corresponding pig. The results were tested using a PERMANOVA model (Adonis) including sample type as a factor, and then pairwise comparisons were made. The bacterial composition found in the CapSas differed from that of the large intestine and feces (P < 0.01), while it did not differ from the first segment of the small intestine (P > 0.10). This study provides evidence that the CapSa effectively samples the intestinal microbiota from the upper section of the small intestine in post-weaning pigs. Furthermore, it was found that the collection of CapSas could only be successfully achieved in pigs classified within the heavier weight category.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38693207
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-59950-3
pii: 10.1038/s41598-024-59950-3
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
9964Subventions
Organisme : H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions
ID : 955374
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Schokker, D. et al. Long-lasting effects of early-life antibiotic treatment and routine animal handling on gut microbiota composition and immune system in Pigs. PLoS ONE 10(2), e0116523 (2015).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116523
pubmed: 25658611
pmcid: 4319779
Jang, K. B., Purvis, J. M. & Kim, S. W. Supplemental effects of dietary lysophospholipids in lactation diets on sow performance, milk composition, gut health, and gut-associated microbiome of offspring. J. Anim. Sci. 98(8), skaa227 (2020).
doi: 10.1093/jas/skaa227
pubmed: 32681642
pmcid: 7457969
Fouhse, J. M., Zijlstra, R. T. & Willing, B. P. The role of gut microbiota in the health and disease of pigs. Anim. Front. 6(3), 30–36 (2016).
doi: 10.2527/af.2016-0031
Luo, Y. et al. Dynamic distribution of gut microbiota in Pigs at different growth stages: Composition and contribution. Microbiol. Spectr. 10(3), e0068821 (2022).
doi: 10.1128/spectrum.00688-21
pubmed: 35583332
Maltecca, C., Bergamaschi, M. & Tiezzi, F. The interaction between microbiome and pig efficiency: A review. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 137(1), 4–13 (2020).
doi: 10.1111/jbg.12443
pubmed: 31576623
Zhao, W. et al. The dynamic distribution of porcine microbiota across different ages and gastrointestinal tract segments. PLoS ONE 10(2), e0117441 (2015).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117441
pubmed: 25688558
pmcid: 4331431
Gresse, R., Chaucheyras Durand, F., Dunière, L., Blanquet-Diot, S. & Forano, E. Microbiota composition and functional profiling throughout the gastrointestinal tract of commercial weaning Piglets. Microorganisms 7(9), 343 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms7090343
pubmed: 31547478
pmcid: 6780805
Li, Y., Wang, X., Wang, X.-Q., Wang, J. & Zhao, J. Life-long dynamics of the swine gut microbiome and their implications in probiotics development and food safety. Gut Microbes 11(6), 1824–1832 (2020).
doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1773748
pubmed: 32584645
pmcid: 7524149
Slifierz, M. J., Friendship, R. M. & Weese, J. S. Longitudinal study of the early-life fecal and nasal microbiotas of the domestic pig. BMC Microbiol. 15(1), 184 (2015).
doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0512-7
pubmed: 26391877
pmcid: 4578254
Duarte, M. E. & Kim, S. W. Intestinal microbiota and its interaction to intestinal health in nursery pigs. Animal Nutr. 8(1), 169–184 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2021.05.001
Choudhury, R., Middelkoop, A., Bolhuis, J. E. & Kleerebezem, M. Legitimate and reliable determination of the age-related intestinal microbiome in Young Piglets; Rectal Swabs and fecal samples provide comparable insights. Front. Microbiol. 10, 466987 (2019).
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01886
van der Wielen, N. et al. Presence of unabsorbed free amino acids at the end of the small intestine indicates the potential for an increase in amino acid uptake in humans and pigs. J. Nutr. 153(3), 673–682 (2023).
doi: 10.1016/j.tjnut.2023.01.038
pubmed: 36809852
Nielsen, T. S., Jørgensen, H., Knudsen, K. E. B. & Lærke, H. N. The microbial fermentation characteristics depend on both carbohydrate source and heat processing: A model experiment with ileo-cannulated pigs. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 68(7), 811–820 (2017).
doi: 10.1080/09637486.2017.1307947
pubmed: 28367709
Tang, Q. et al. Current sampling methods for Gut microbiota: A call for more precise devices. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 10, 151 (2020).
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2020.00151
pubmed: 32328469
pmcid: 7161087
Rezaei Nejad, H. et al. Ingestible Osmotic pill for in vivo sampling of gut microbiomes. Adv. Intell. Syst. 1(5), 1900053 (2019).
doi: 10.1002/aisy.201900053
Folz, J. et al. Human metabolome variation along the upper intestinal tract. Nat. Metab. 5, 777 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s42255-023-00777-z
pubmed: 37165176
pmcid: 10229427
Shalon, D. et al. Profiling the human intestinal environment under physiological conditions. Nature 617, 581 (2023).
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-05989-7
pubmed: 37165188
pmcid: 10191855
Reynaud, Y. et al. Temporal changes in postprandial intragastric pH: Comparing measurement methods, food structure effects, and kinetic modelling. Food Res. Int. 128, 108784 (2020).
doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.108784
pubmed: 31955750
García-Viñado, I., M. Tretola, G. Bee, and C. Ollagnier. Capsule for sampling (CapSa): A less invasive tool to sample small-intestinal content in pigs. In 73rd Annual Meeting of European Federation of Animal Science (EAAP). 2022. Porto: Zenodo.
Henze, L. J. et al. Characterization of gastrointestinal transit and luminal conditions in pigs using a telemetric motility capsule. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 156, 105627 (2021).
doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2020.105627
pubmed: 33122007
Hadinia, N., Edalatian Dovom, M. R. & Yavarmanesh, M. The effect of fermentation conditions temperature, salt concentration, and pH with lactobacillus strains for producing short chain fatty acids. LWT 165, 113709 (2022).
doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2022.113709
Walker Alan, W., Duncan Sylvia, H., McWilliam Leitch, E. C., Child Matthew, W. & Flint Harry, J. pH and peptide supply can radically alter bacterial populations and short-chain fatty acid ratios within microbial communities from the human colon. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71(7), 3692–3700 (2005).
doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3692-3700.2005
pubmed: 16000778
pmcid: 1169066
Adhikari, B., Kim, S. W. & Kwon, Y. M. Characterization of microbiota associated with digesta and mucosa in different regions of gastrointestinal tract of nursery pigs. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 20(7), 1630 (2019).
doi: 10.3390/ijms20071630
pubmed: 30986907
pmcid: 6480377
Mu, C., Y. Yang, Y. Su, E.G. Zoetendal, and W. Zhu, Differences in microbiota membership along the gastrointestinal tract of piglets and their differential alterations following an early-life antibiotic intervention. Front. Microbiol., 2017. 8.
Earle, K. A. et al. Quantitative imaging of gut microbiota spatial organization. Cell Host Microbe 18(4), 478–488 (2015).
doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2015.09.002
pubmed: 26439864
pmcid: 4628835
Zmora, N. et al. Personalized gut mucosal colonization resistance to empiric probiotics is associated with unique host and microbiome features. Cell 174(6), 1388-1405.e21 (2018).
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.041
pubmed: 30193112
Kvetina, J. et al. Use of electrogastrography in preclinical studies of cholinergic and anticholinergic agents in experimental pigs. Physiol. Res. 64(Suppl 5), S647–S652 (2015).
doi: 10.33549/physiolres.933227
pubmed: 26674291
Kopácová, M. et al. Wireless video capsule enteroscopy in preclinical studies: Methodical design of its applicability in experimental pigs. Dig. Dis. Sci. 55(3), 626–630 (2010).
doi: 10.1007/s10620-009-0779-3
pubmed: 19294508
Camilleri, M. & Atieh, J. New developments in prokinetic therapy for gastric motility disorders. Front. Pharm. 12, 2216 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.711500
Agroscope, Apports alimentaires recommandés pour les porcs (livre jaune). 2ème édition revue et complétée 2005 ed. 2005.
Briejer, M. R. et al. The in vitro pharmacological profile of prucalopride, a novel enterokinetic compound. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 423(1), 71–83 (2001).
doi: 10.1016/S0014-2999(01)01087-1
pubmed: 11438309
De Maeyer, J. H., Lefebvre, R. A. & Schuurkes, J. A. 5-HT4 receptor agonists: similar but not the same. Neurogastroenterol. Motil. 20(2), 99–112 (2008).
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2982.2007.01059.x
pubmed: 18199093
Camilleri, M. & Atieh, J. New developments in prokinetic therapy for gastric motility disorders. Front. Pharmacol. 12, 711500 (2021).
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.711500
pubmed: 34504426
pmcid: 8421525
De Ponti, F. Pharmacology of serotonin: What a clinician should know. Gut 53(10), 1520 (2004).
doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.035568
pubmed: 15361507
pmcid: 1774227
Takahashi, S., Tomita, J., Nishioka, K., Hisada, T. & Nishijima, M. Development of a prokaryotic universal primer for simultaneous analysis of bacteria and archaea using next-generation sequencing. PLOS ONE 9(8), e105592 (2014).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105592
pubmed: 25144201
pmcid: 4140814
Callahan, B. J. et al. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat. Methods 13(7), 581–583 (2016).
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869
pubmed: 27214047
pmcid: 4927377
Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013).
doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1219
pubmed: 23193283
McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLOS ONE 8(4), e61217 (2013).
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061217
pubmed: 23630581
pmcid: 3632530
Dixon, P. VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. J. Veg Sci. 14(6), 927–930 (2003).
doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2003.tb02228.x
Martinez Arbizu, P., pairwiseAdonis: Pairwise multilevel comparison using adonis. R package version 0.4. 2020.