No gene by stressful life events interaction on individual differences in adults' self-control.

gene-environment interaction genetics polygenic scores self-control stress

Journal

Frontiers in psychiatry
ISSN: 1664-0640
Titre abrégé: Front Psychiatry
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101545006

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 19 02 2024
accepted: 03 04 2024
medline: 2 5 2024
pubmed: 2 5 2024
entrez: 2 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Difficulty with self-control, or the ability to alter impulses and behavior in a goal-directed way, predicts interpersonal conflict, lower socioeconomic attainments, and more adverse health outcomes. Etiological understanding, and intervention for low self-control is, therefore, a public health goal. A prominent developmental theory proposes that individuals with high genetic propensity for low self-control that are also exposed to stressful environments may be most at-risk of low levels of self-control. Here we examine if polygenic measures associated with behaviors marked by low self-control interact with stressful life events in predicting self-control. Leveraging molecular data from a large population-based Dutch sample (N = 7,090, Mage = 41.2) to test for effects of genetics (i.e., polygenic scores for ADHD and aggression), stressful life events (e.g., traffic accident, violent assault, financial problems), and a gene-by-stress interaction on self-control (measured with the ASEBA Self-Control Scale). Both genetics (β =.03 -.04, p <.001) and stressful life events (β = .11 -.14, p <.001) were associated with individual differences in self-control. We find no evidence of a gene-by-stressful life events interaction on individual differences in adults' self-control. Our findings are consistent with the notion that genetic influences and stressful life events exert largely independent effects on adult self-control. However, the small effect sizes of polygenic scores increases the likelihood of null results. Genetically-informed longitudinal research in large samples can further inform the etiology of individual differences in self-control from early childhood into later adulthood and its downstream implications for public health.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Difficulty with self-control, or the ability to alter impulses and behavior in a goal-directed way, predicts interpersonal conflict, lower socioeconomic attainments, and more adverse health outcomes. Etiological understanding, and intervention for low self-control is, therefore, a public health goal. A prominent developmental theory proposes that individuals with high genetic propensity for low self-control that are also exposed to stressful environments may be most at-risk of low levels of self-control. Here we examine if polygenic measures associated with behaviors marked by low self-control interact with stressful life events in predicting self-control.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Leveraging molecular data from a large population-based Dutch sample (N = 7,090, Mage = 41.2) to test for effects of genetics (i.e., polygenic scores for ADHD and aggression), stressful life events (e.g., traffic accident, violent assault, financial problems), and a gene-by-stress interaction on self-control (measured with the ASEBA Self-Control Scale).
Results UNASSIGNED
Both genetics (β =.03 -.04, p <.001) and stressful life events (β = .11 -.14, p <.001) were associated with individual differences in self-control. We find no evidence of a gene-by-stressful life events interaction on individual differences in adults' self-control.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
Our findings are consistent with the notion that genetic influences and stressful life events exert largely independent effects on adult self-control. However, the small effect sizes of polygenic scores increases the likelihood of null results. Genetically-informed longitudinal research in large samples can further inform the etiology of individual differences in self-control from early childhood into later adulthood and its downstream implications for public health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38693999
doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1388264
pmc: PMC11061522
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1388264

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Willems, Raffington, Ligthart, Pool, Hottenga, Finkenauer and Bartels.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Yayouk Eva Willems (YE)

Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Research Group Biosocial - Biology, Social Disparities, and Development, Berlin, Germany.

Laurel Raffington (L)

Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Max Planck Research Group Biosocial - Biology, Social Disparities, and Development, Berlin, Germany.

Lannie Ligthart (L)

Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Rene Pool (R)

Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Jouke Jan Hottenga (JJ)

Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Catrin Finkenauer (C)

Department of Interdisciplinary Social Science, Universiteit Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Meike Bartels (M)

Department of Biological Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH