Under-reporting by surgical pathologists in tissue removed during revision surgery for metal-on-metal arthroplasties.

adverse local tissue reactions metal-on-metal arthroplasty metallosis revision arthroplasty

Journal

Annals of medicine and surgery (2012)
ISSN: 2049-0801
Titre abrégé: Ann Med Surg (Lond)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101616869

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2024
Historique:
received: 10 09 2023
accepted: 25 02 2024
medline: 2 5 2024
pubmed: 2 5 2024
entrez: 2 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although adverse local tissue reactions (ALTR) have been reported for metal-on-metal implants (MoM) requiring early revision surgery, no study has looked at the accuracy of surgical pathologists in diagnosing ALTR. This study aims to investigate the accuracy of reporting adverse local tissue reactions in tissue samples following revision surgery from metal-on-metal implants. The authors reviewed histology glass slides as well as the original pathology reports of tissue processed in revision arthroplasties in 23 cases. These samples were microscopically analyzed for tissue necrosis and cystic degeneration, the presence of metal particles, corrosion byproducts, membrane formation, histiocytic cells, lymphocytic cells, and vascular pathology. The authors' findings were then compared to their corresponding original pathology reports. The authors found consistent under-reporting of the tissue findings. Most importantly, 18 samples showed evidence of metal present compared to 2 samples on original pathology reporting. The authors found that 15 samples showed evidence of pathological membranous tissue compared to just 6 on original pathology reporting. While just 3 of the original pathology reports indicated the presence of areas of predominantly lymphocytic inflammatory cells, the authors found 13 examples of such areas. Although ALTR reactions have been described as a sequala of failed MoM, the authors' data suggest that ALTR may occur more frequently than previously described. Under-reported findings of ALTR deprive both the patient and orthopaedic surgeon of important information that can help guide further follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38694334
doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001911
pii: AMSU-D-23-01991
pmc: PMC11060295
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

2432-2436

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

A.V. gave expert testimony in the past and received eight payments from Weitz and Luxenburg Law Firm. Otherwise NA.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article

Auteurs

Anthony Velleca (A)

SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University, College of Medicine.

Stephen Pournaras (S)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, One Brooklyn Health System/Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn.

Eli Bryk (E)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, New York-Presbyterian/Lower Manhattan Hospital, New York, NY.

Vincent Vigorita (V)

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, One Brooklyn Health System/Kingsbrook Jewish Medical Center, Brooklyn.

Classifications MeSH