Investigating the Effects of Level-Specific CE-Chirp on Auditory Brainstem Response Waves in Normal Hearing Infants.
LS CE-Chirp
auditory brainstem response
brain stem
evoked potential
infants
Journal
The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS
ISSN: 1394-195X
Titre abrégé: Malays J Med Sci
Pays: Malaysia
ID NLM: 101126308
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Apr 2024
Historique:
received:
04
01
2023
accepted:
02
06
2023
medline:
2
5
2024
pubmed:
2
5
2024
entrez:
2
5
2024
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to the level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp has been reported to provide optimum neural synchrony along cochlear partitions, theoretically improving ABR waveform resolution. Despite this promising finding, limited studies have been conducted to contrast the results between LS CE-Chirp and Click stimuli. The current study aimed to compare the results of ABR between the two stimuli (Click and LS CE-Chirp). Sixty-seven normal-hearing infants, both with and without risk factors, aged less than 7 months old, participated in this study. The ABR test was conducted at 70 dBnHL using 33.3 stimulus repetition rates with both Click and LS CE-Chirp stimuli. The signal averaging was stopped at a maximum fixed signal average of 2,500 sweeps. Data were statistically compared between the two stimuli using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The waves I and V ABRs elicited by LS CE-Chirp exhibited significantly larger amplitudes than the Click stimulus. However, the amplitude of wave III and absolute latencies were similar in both stimuli at a supra-threshold level. LS CE-Chirp has the advantage of larger amplitudes than the ABR from Click at the supra-threshold level (70 dBnHL) in normal-hearing infants.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Auditory brainstem response (ABR) to the level-specific (LS) CE-Chirp has been reported to provide optimum neural synchrony along cochlear partitions, theoretically improving ABR waveform resolution. Despite this promising finding, limited studies have been conducted to contrast the results between LS CE-Chirp and Click stimuli. The current study aimed to compare the results of ABR between the two stimuli (Click and LS CE-Chirp).
Method
UNASSIGNED
Sixty-seven normal-hearing infants, both with and without risk factors, aged less than 7 months old, participated in this study. The ABR test was conducted at 70 dBnHL using 33.3 stimulus repetition rates with both Click and LS CE-Chirp stimuli. The signal averaging was stopped at a maximum fixed signal average of 2,500 sweeps. Data were statistically compared between the two stimuli using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results
UNASSIGNED
The waves I and V ABRs elicited by LS CE-Chirp exhibited significantly larger amplitudes than the Click stimulus. However, the amplitude of wave III and absolute latencies were similar in both stimuli at a supra-threshold level.
Conclusion
UNASSIGNED
LS CE-Chirp has the advantage of larger amplitudes than the ABR from Click at the supra-threshold level (70 dBnHL) in normal-hearing infants.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38694577
doi: 10.21315/mjms2024.31.2.7
pii: 07mjms3102_oa
pmc: PMC11057821
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
62-71Informations de copyright
© Penerbit Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2024.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Conflict of Interest: None.