Outcomes of Dorsolumbar and Lumbar Spinal Tuberculosis Treated by Minimally Invasive and Open Techniques: A Prospective Comparative Study.

Minimally invasive spine surgery Open decompression Posterior instrumentation Spinal tuberculosis

Journal

Indian journal of orthopaedics
ISSN: 0019-5413
Titre abrégé: Indian J Orthop
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 0137736

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2024
Historique:
received: 31 05 2023
accepted: 11 02 2024
pmc-release: 20 03 2025
medline: 2 5 2024
pubmed: 2 5 2024
entrez: 2 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To compare the outcomes of minimally invasive and open techniques in the surgical management of dorsolumbar and lumbar spinal tuberculosis (STB). Skeletally mature patients with active STB involving thoracolumbar and lumbar region confirmed by radiology (X-ray, MRI) and histopathological examination were included. Healed and mechanically stable STB, patients having severe hepatic and renal impairment, coexisting spinal conditions such as ankylosing spondylitis and rheumatoid arthritis, and patients unwilling to participate were excluded from the study. The patients were divided in to two groups, group A consisted of patients treated by MIS techniques and group B consisted of patients treated by open techniques. All the patients had a minimum follow-up of 24 months. A total of 42 patients were included in the study. MIS techniques were used in 18 patients and open techniques were used in 24 patients. On comparison between the two groups, blood loss (234 ml vs 742 ml), and immediate post-operative VAS score (5.26 vs 7.08) were significantly better in group A, whereas kyphotic correction (16° vs 33.25°) was significantly better in group B. Rest of the parameters such as duration of surgery, VAS score, ODI score and number of instrumented levels did not show significant difference between the two groups. MIS stabilization when compared to open techniques is associated with significant improvement in immediate post-operative VAS scores. The MIS approaches at 2-year follow-up have functional results similar to open techniques. MIS is inferior to open techniques in kyphosis correction and may be associated with complications.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38694702
doi: 10.1007/s43465-024-01123-5
pii: 1123
pmc: PMC11058730
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

558-566

Informations de copyright

© Indian Orthopaedics Association 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of InterestNone.

Auteurs

Syed Ifthekar (S)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India.
Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Hyderabad, India.

Kaustubh Ahuja (K)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India.

Samarth Mittal (S)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India.
BLK Max Speciality Hospital, Delhi, India.

Gagandeep Yadav (G)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India.

Jiitender Chaturvedi (J)

Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India.

Bhaskar Sarkar (B)

Department of Trauma Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India.

Pankaj Kandwal (P)

Department of Orthopaedics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand India.

Classifications MeSH