The association between gynecological complaints and the uterine sonographic features in women with a history of cesarean section.

Bleeding disorder Cesarean scar Cesarean section Dysmenorrhea Sonography

Journal

Archives of gynecology and obstetrics
ISSN: 1432-0711
Titre abrégé: Arch Gynecol Obstet
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8710213

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 May 2024
Historique:
received: 24 02 2024
accepted: 19 04 2024
medline: 2 5 2024
pubmed: 2 5 2024
entrez: 2 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of this study is to investigate the association between post-cesarean sonographic uterine measures, dysmenorrhea, and bleeding disorders. This is a cross-sectional study where 500 women with a history of only one cesarean section (CS) were recruited. A transvaginal transducer, GE RIC6-12-D was used for the acquisition of volumetric datasets 18 ± 7 months postpartum. Uterine length (UL), cervical length (CL), niche length (L), niche depth (D), niche width (W), fibrosis length (FL), fibrosis depth (FD), residual myometrial thickness (RMT), endometrial thickness (EM), scar to internal os distance (SO), anterior myometrial thickness superior (sAMT) and inferior (iAMT) to the scar, and the posterior myometrial thickness opposite the scar (PMT), superior (sPMT), and inferior to it (iPMT) were measured. Logistic regression with odds ratios (OR), 95% confidence intervals (CI) and ROC curves were utilized. The proportion of patients with incident post-cesarean bleeding disorders and dysmenorrhoea was 36% (CI 32%, 40%) and 17% (CI 14%, 21%) respectively. Univariate logistic regression showed that only UL was associated with bleeding disorders [OR 1.04 (CI 1.01,10.7) p value 0.005], whereas dysmenorrhea was associated with RMT [OR 0.82 (CI 0.71,0.95) p value 0.008], SO [OR 0.91 (CI 0.86,0.98) p value 0.01], and RMT ratio [OR 0.98 (CI 0.97,0.99) p value 0.03]. Multivariate logistic regression for dysmenorrhoea including SO and RMT remains statistically significant with p values <0.05 and area under the curve of 0.66. There is an association between sonographic appearance of CS scars and dysmenorrhoea. Nevertheless, the association is weak and other biological post-cesarean characteristics should be explored as potential causes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38695973
doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07526-x
pii: 10.1007/s00404-024-07526-x
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Destatis (2024) Fast ein Drittel aller Geburten im Jahr 2021 durch Kaiserschnitt. Statistisches Bundesamt. https://www.destatis.de/EN/Press/2023/02/PE23_N009_231.html . Accessed 1 Feb 2024
Sandall J, Tribe RM, Avery L, Mola G, Visser GH, Homer CS, Gibbons D, Kelly NM, Kennedy HP, Kidanto H, Taylor P, Temmerman M (2018) Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet 392:1349–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S01406736(18)31930-5
doi: 10.1016/S01406736(18)31930-5 pubmed: 30322585
Wang C-B, Chiu W-W-C, Lee C-Y, Sun Y-L, Lin Y-H, Tseng C-J (2009) Cesarean scar defect: correlation between Cesarean section number, defect size, clinical symptoms and uterine position. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:85–89. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.6405
doi: 10.1002/uog.6405 pubmed: 19565535
Bij de Vaate AJM, van der Voet LF, Naji O, Witmer M, Veersema S, Brölmann HAM, Bourne T, Huirne JAF (2014) Prevalence, potential risk factors for development and symptoms related to the presence of uterine niches following Cesarean section: systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 43:372–382. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13199
doi: 10.1002/uog.13199 pubmed: 23996650
Fabres C, Aviles G, De La Jara C, Escalona J, Muñoz JF, Mackenna A, Fernández C, Zegers HF, Fernández E (2003) The Cesarean delivery scar pouch. J Ultrasound Med 22:695–700. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2003.22.7.695
doi: 10.7863/jum.2003.22.7.695 pubmed: 12862268
Thurmond AS, Harvey WJ, Smith SA (1999) Cesarean section scar as a cause of abnormal vaginal bleeding: diagnosis by sonohysterography. J Ultrasound Med 18:13–16. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13
doi: 10.7863/jum.1999.18.1.13 pubmed: 9952074
Jordans IPM, de Leeuw RA, Stegwee SI, Amso NN, Barri-Soldevila PN, van den Bosch T, Bourne T, Brölmann HAM, Donnez O, Dueholm M, Hehenkamp WJK, Jastrow N, Jurkovic D, Mashiach R, Naji O, Streuli I, Timmerman D, van der Voet LF, Huirne JAF (2019) Sonographic examination of uterine niche in non-pregnant women: a modified Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 53:107–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19049
doi: 10.1002/uog.19049 pubmed: 29536581 pmcid: 6590297
Al NA, Mouzakiti N, Wolnicki B, Louwen F, Bahlmann F (2021) Assessing lateral uterine wall defects and residual myometrial thickness after cesarean section. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 258(391):395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.033
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.01.033
Al NA, Wolnicki B, Mouzakiti N, Reinbach T, Louwen F, Bahlmann F (2021) Anatomy of the sonographic post-cesarean uterus. Arch Gynecol Obstet 304:1485–1491. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-02106074-y
doi: 10.1007/s00404-02106074-y
Al NA, Mouzakiti N, Hondrich M, Louwen F, Bahlmann F (2020) The B-mode sonographic evaluation of the post-caesarean uterine wall and its methodology: a study protocol. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 46:2547–2551. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.14492
doi: 10.1111/jog.14492
Practice Bulletin No. 128: Diagnosis of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding in Reproductive-Aged Women (2012) Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 120(1):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318262e320
Hewitt GD, Gerancher KR (2018) ACOG COMMITTEE OPINION number 760 dysmenorrhea and endometriosis in the adolescent. Obstet Gynecol (New York. 1953) 132(6):E249–E258. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002978
Klein Meuleman SJM, Murji A, van den Bosch T, Donnez O, Grimbizis G, Saridogan E, Chantraine F, Bourne T, Timmerman D, Huirne JAF, de Leeuw RA (2023) Definition and criteria for diagnosing cesarean scar disorder. JAMA Netw Open 6:e235321. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5321
doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.5321 pubmed: 36988956 pmcid: 10061236
Pomorski M, Fuchs T, Zimmer M (2014) Prediction of uterine dehiscence using ultrasonographic parameters of cesarean section scar in the nonpregnant uterus: a prospective observational study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14:365. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-014-0365-3
doi: 10.1186/s12884-014-0365-3 pubmed: 25733122 pmcid: 4212089
Zhou X, Zhang T, Qiao H, Zhang Y, Wang X (2021) Evaluation of uterine scar healing by transvaginal ultrasound in 607 nonpregnant women with a history of cesarean section. BMC Women’s Health 21:199. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01337-x
doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01337-x pubmed: 33985487 pmcid: 8117607
Al Naimi A, Jennewein L, Mouzakiti N, Louwen F, Bahlmann F (2022) The effect of the onset of labor on the characteristics of the cesarean scar. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 157(2):322–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.13775
doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13775 pubmed: 34077556
Ewies AAA, Qadri S, Awasthi R, Zanetto U (2022) Caesarean section operation is not associated with myometrial hypertrophy–a prospective cohort study. J Obstet Gynaecol 42(6):2474–2479. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2022.2074787
Higuchi A, Tsuji S, Nobuta Y, Nakamura A, Katsura D, Amano T, Kimura F, Tanimura S, Murakami T (2021) Histopathological evaluation of cesarean scar defect in women with cesarean scar syndrome. Reprod Med Biol 21:e12431. https://doi.org/10.1002/rmb2.12431
doi: 10.1002/rmb2.12431 pubmed: 35386374 pmcid: 8967299
Antila RM, Mäenpää JU, Huhtala HS, Tomás EI, Staff SM (2020) Association of cesarean scar defect with abnormal uterine bleeding: the results of a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 244:134–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.021
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.11.021 pubmed: 31785470
van der Voet LF, Bij de Vaate AM, Veersema S, Brölmann HA, Huirne JA (2014) Long-term complications of caesarean section. The niche in the scar: a prospective cohort study on niche prevalence and its relation to abnormal uterine bleeding. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol 121(2):236–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12542
Bij de Vaate AJM, Brölmann HAM, van der Voet LF, van der Slikke JW, Veersema S, Huirne JAF (2011) Ultrasound evaluation of the Cesarean scar: relation between a niche and postmenstrual spotting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:93–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.8864
doi: 10.1002/uog.8864 pubmed: 21031351
Mariya T, Umemoto M, Sugita N, Suzuki M, Saito T (2019) Recurrent massive uterine bleeding from a Cesarean scar treated successfully by laparoscopic surgery. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 8:36–39. https://doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_69_18
doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_69_18 pubmed: 30783588 pmcid: 6367910
Baranov A, Salvesen KÅ, Vikhareva O (2017) Assessment of Cesarean hysterotomy scar before pregnancy and at 11–14 weeks of gestation: a prospective cohort study. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 50:105–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.16220
doi: 10.1002/uog.16220 pubmed: 27419374

Auteurs

Helen Kellner (H)

Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital of the Goethe University of Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany.

Alex Horky (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buergerhospital - Dr. Senckenberg Foundation, Nibelungenallee 37-41, D-60318, Frankfurt Am Main, Hessen, Germany.

Frank Louwen (F)

Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital of the Goethe University of Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany.

Franz Bahlmann (F)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buergerhospital - Dr. Senckenberg Foundation, Nibelungenallee 37-41, D-60318, Frankfurt Am Main, Hessen, Germany.

Ammar Al Naimi (A)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Buergerhospital - Dr. Senckenberg Foundation, Nibelungenallee 37-41, D-60318, Frankfurt Am Main, Hessen, Germany. ammar.alnaimi@uclmail.net.
Department of Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine, University Hospital of the Goethe University of Frankfurt, Hessen, Germany. ammar.alnaimi@uclmail.net.

Classifications MeSH