Prediction of endovascular leaks after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair though machine learning applied to pre-procedural computed tomography angiographs.
Aortic aneurysms
Computed tomography
Computed tomography angiography
Endoleaks
Machine learning
Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair
Journal
Physical and engineering sciences in medicine
ISSN: 2662-4737
Titre abrégé: Phys Eng Sci Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101760671
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 May 2024
02 May 2024
Historique:
received:
22
03
2023
accepted:
18
04
2024
medline:
2
5
2024
pubmed:
2
5
2024
entrez:
2
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To predict endoleaks after thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) we submitted patient characteristics and vessel features observed on pre- operative computed tomography angiography (CTA) to machine-learning. We evaluated 1-year follow-up CT scans (arterial and delayed phases) in patients who underwent TEVAR for the presence or absence of an endoleak. We evaluated the effect of machine learning of the patient age, sex, weight, and height, plus 22 vascular features on the ability to predict post-TEVAR endoleaks. The extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) for ML system was trained on 14 patients with- and 131 without endoleaks. We calculated their importance by applying XGBoost to machine learning and compared our findings between with those of conventional vessel measurement-based methods such as the 22 vascular features by using the Pearson correlation coefficients. Pearson correlation coefficient and 95% confidence interval (CI) were r = 0.86 and 0.75 to 0.92 for the machine learning, r = - 0.44 and - 0.56 to - 0.29 for the vascular angle, and r = - 0.19 and - 0.34 to - 0.02 for the diameter between the subclavian artery and the aneurysm (Fig. 3a-c, all: p < 0.05). With machine-learning, the univariate analysis was significant higher compared with the vascular angle and in the diameter between the subclavian artery and the aneurysm such as the conventional methods (p < 0.05). To predict the risk for post-TEVAR endoleaks, machine learning was superior to the conventional vessel measurement method when factors such as patient characteristics, and vascular features (vessel length, diameter, and angle) were evaluated on pre-TEVAR thoracic CTA images.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38696098
doi: 10.1007/s13246-024-01429-6
pii: 10.1007/s13246-024-01429-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Australasian College of Physical Scientists and Engineers in Medicine.
Références
Chu MW, Forbes TL, Kirk Lawlor D, Harris KA, Derose G (2007) Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic disease: early and midterm experience. Vasc Endovasc Surg 41:186–191
doi: 10.1177/1538574406298512
Svensson LG, Kouchoukos NT, Miller DC et al (2008) Expert consensus document on the treatment of descending thoracic aortic disease using endovascular stent-grafts. Ann Thorac Surg 85:S1-41
doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.10.099
pubmed: 18083364
Nienaber CA, Fattori R, Lund G et al (1999) Nonsurgical reconstruction of thoracic aortic dissection by stent-graft placement. N Engl J Med 340:1539–1545
doi: 10.1056/NEJM199905203402003
pubmed: 10332015
Greenberg RK, O’Neill S, Walker E et al (2005) Endovascular repair of thoracic aortic lesions with the Zenith TX1 and TX2 thoracic grafts: intermediate-term results. J Vasc Surg 41:589–596
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.01.043
pubmed: 15874921
Demers P, Miller DC, Mitchell RS et al (2004) Midterm results of endovascular repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms with first-generation stent grafts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 127:664–673
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.10.047
pubmed: 15001894
Verhoye JP, Miller DC, Sze D, Dake MD, Mitchell RS (2008) Complicated acute type B aortic dissection: midterm results of emergency endovascular stent-grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 136:424–430
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.01.046
pubmed: 18692652
Stavropoulos SW, Carpenter JP (2006) Postoperative imaging surveillance and endoleak management after endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg 43(Suppl A):89a–93a
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.10.057
pubmed: 16473179
Weissler EH, Hammill BG, Armstrong JL et al (2023) Association between device type and type IIIb endoleaks following thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 65:112–119
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.10.005
pubmed: 36209962
Heo J, Yoon JG, Park H, Kim YD, Nam HS, Heo JH (2019) Machine learning-based model for prediction of outcomes in acute stroke. Stroke 50:1263–1265
doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.024293
pubmed: 30890116
<10302-Article Text-189731-10-20180216.pdf>
Masuda T, Shimizu Y, Kawazoe Y, Sakata Y (2018) Dispatch reports on Korean Society of Radiological Science Conference 2018 (KSRSC 2018). Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 74:1109–1112
doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2018_JSRT_74.9.1109
pubmed: 30232309
Masuda T (2021) [7. Statistical analysis in clinical research]. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 77:739–744
doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2021_JSRT_77.7.739
pubmed: 34305061
Fayad A (2008) Thoracic endovascular stent graft with a bird’s beak sign. Can J Anaesth 55:785–786
doi: 10.1007/BF03016353
pubmed: 19138920
Kashyap VS, Pavkov ML, Bishop PD et al (2008) Angiography underestimates peripheral atherosclerosis: lumenography revisited. J Endovasc Ther 15:117–125
doi: 10.1583/07-2249R.1
pubmed: 18254670
pmcid: 2795386
Canaud L, Alric P, Laurent M et al (2008) Proximal fixation of thoracic stent-grafts as a function of oversizing and increasing aortic arch angulation in human cadaveric aortas. J Endovasc Ther 15:326–334
doi: 10.1583/08-2425.1
pubmed: 18540711
Garzón G, Fernández-Velilla M, Martí M, Acitores I, Ybáñez F, Riera L (2005) Endovascular stent-graft treatment of thoracic aortic disease. Radiographics 25(Suppl 1):S229–S244
doi: 10.1148/rg.25si055513
pubmed: 16227493
Ueda T, Fleischmann D, Rubin GD, Dake MD, Sze DY (2008) Imaging of the thoracic aorta before and after stent-graft repair of aneurysms and dissections. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 20:348–357
doi: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2008.11.008
pubmed: 19251176
Sze DY, Mitchell RS, Miller DC et al (2009) Infolding and collapse of thoracic endoprostheses: manifestations and treatment options. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138:324–333
doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.12.007
pubmed: 19619775
Sze DY, van den Bosch MA, Dake MD et al (2009) Factors portending endoleak formation after thoracic aortic stent-graft repair of complicated aortic dissection. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2:105–112
doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.108.819722
pubmed: 20031703
Tse LW, MacKenzie KS, Montreuil B, Obrand DI, Steinmetz OK (2004) The proximal landing zone in endovascular repair of the thoracic aorta. Ann Vasc Surg 18:178–185
doi: 10.1007/s10016-004-0008-7
pubmed: 15253253
Ishimaru S (2004) Endografting of the aortic arch. J Endovasc Ther 11(Suppl 2):II62-71
doi: 10.1177/15266028040110S609
pubmed: 15760265
Melissano G, Civilini E, Bertoglio L et al (2007) Results of endografting of the aortic arch in different landing zones. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 33:561–566
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.019
van Keulen JW, van Prehn J, Prokop M, Moll FL, van Herwaarden JA (2009) Dynamics of the aorta before and after endovascular aneurysm repair: a systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 38:586–596
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2009.06.018
pubmed: 19648032
Raffort J, Adam C, Carrier M et al (2020) Artificial intelligence in abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 72:321-333.e321
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.12.026
pubmed: 32093909
Karthikesalingam A, Holt PJ, Vidal-Diez A et al (2013) Predicting aortic complications after endovascular aneurysm repair. Br J Surg 100:1302–1311
doi: 10.1002/bjs.9177
pubmed: 23797788
Barnes M, Boult M, Maddern G, Fitridge R (2008) A model to predict outcomes for endovascular aneurysm repair using preoperative variables. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 35:571–579
doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.12.003
pubmed: 18255324
Talebi S, Madani MH, Madani A et al (2020) Machine learning for endoleak detection after endovascular aortic repair. Sci Rep 10:18343
doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74936-7
pubmed: 33110113
pmcid: 7591558
Masuda T, Baba Y, Nakaura T et al (2022) Applying patient characteristics, stent-graft selection, and pre-operative computed tomographic angiography data to a machine learning algorithm: Is endoleak prediction possible? Radiography (Lond) 28:906–911
doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2022.06.004
pubmed: 35785641
Dong Y, Que L, Jia Q et al (2022) Predicting reintervention after thoracic endovascular aortic repair of Stanford type B aortic dissection using machine learning. Eur Radiol 32:355–367
doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07849-2
pubmed: 34156553