Lateral response artifact correction method using image stitching technique in radiochromic film dosimetry.
film dosimetry
image‐stitching technique
lateral response artifact
Journal
Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 May 2024
02 May 2024
Historique:
revised:
01
04
2024
received:
27
08
2023
accepted:
13
04
2024
medline:
2
5
2024
pubmed:
2
5
2024
entrez:
2
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Lateral response artifact (LRA) is caused by the interaction between film and flatbed scanner in the direction perpendicular to the scanning direction. This can significantly affect the accuracy of patient-specific quality assurance (QA) in cases involving large irradiation fields. We hypothesized that by utilizing the central area of the flatbed scanner, where the magnitude of LRA is relatively small, the LRA could be mitigated effectively. This study proposes a practical solution using the image-stitching technique to correct LRA for patient-specific QA involving large irradiation fields. Gafchromic™ EBT4 film and Epson Expression ES-G11000 flatbed scanner were used in this study. The image-stitching algorithm requires a spot between adjacent images to combine them. The film was scanned at three locations on a flatbed scanner, and these images were combined using the image-stitching technique. The combined film dose was then calculated and compared with the treatment planning system (TPS)-calculated dose using gamma analysis (3%/2 mm). Our proposed LRA correction was applied to several films exposed to 18 × 18 cm For doses of 200, 400, and 600 cGy, the gamma analysis values with and without LRA corrections were 95.7% versus 67.8%, 95.5% versus 66.2%, and 91.8% versus 35.9%, respectively. For the clinical VMAT treatment plan, the average pass rate ± standard deviation in gamma analysis was 94.1% ± 0.4% with LRA corrections and 72.5% ± 1.5% without LRA corrections. The effectiveness of our proposed LRA correction using the image-stitching technique was demonstrated to significantly improve the accuracy of patient-specific QA for VMAT treatment plans involving large irradiation fields.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e14373Subventions
Organisme : JSPS KAKENHI
ID : 21K15846
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
Références
Aristophanous M, Suh Y, Chi PC, Whittlesey LJ, LaNeave S, Martel MK. Initial clinical experience with ArcCHECK for IMRT/VMAT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2016;17(5):20‐33.
Ahmed S, Zhang G, Moros EG, Feygelman V. Comprehensive evaluation of the high‐resolution diode array for SRS dosimetry. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(10):13‐23.
Boh Lim S, Tyagi N, Subashi E, Liang J, Chan M. An evaluation of the use of EBT‐XD film for SRS/SBRT commissioning of a 1.5 Tesla MR‐Linac system. Phys Med. 2022;96:9‐17.
Fiandra C, Ricardi U, Ragona R, et al. Clinical use of EBT model Gafchromic film in radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2006;33(11):4314‐4319.
Schoenfeld AA, Poppinga D, Harder D, Doerner KJ, Poppe B. The artefacts of radiochromic film dosimetry with flatbed scanners and their causation by light scattering from radiation‐induced polymers. Phys Med Biol. 2014;59(13):3575‐3597.
van Battum LJ, Huizenga H, Verdaasdonk RM, et al. How flatbed scanners upset accurate film dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61(2):625‐649.
Schoenfeld AA, Wieker S, Harder D, Poppe B. The origin of the flatbed scanner artifacts in radiochromic film dosimetry‐key experiments and theoretical descriptions. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61(21):7704‐7724.
Miura H, Ozawa S, Okazue T, Enosaki T, Nagata Y. Characterization of scanning orientation and lateral response artifact for EBT4 Gafchromic film. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2023;24(8):e13992.
Lárraga‐Gutiérrez JM, García‐Garduño OA, Treviño‐Palacios C, Herrera‐González JA. Evaluation of a LED‐based flatbed document scanner for radiochromic film dosimetry in transmission mode. Phys Med. 2018;47:86‐91.
Paelinck L, De Neve W, De Wagter C. Precautions and strategies in using a commercial flatbed scanner for radiochromic film dosimetry. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(1):231‐242.
Saur S, Frengen J. GafChromic EBT film dosimetry with flatbed CCD scanner: a novel background correction method and full dose uncertainty analysis. Med Phys. 2008;35(7):3094‐3101.
Menegotti L, Delana A, Martignano A. Radiochromic film dosimetry with flatbed scanners: a fast and accurate method for dose calibration and uniformity correction with single film exposure. Med Phys. 2008;35(7):3078‐3085.
Micke A, Lewis DF, Yu X. Multichannel film dosimetry with nonuniformity correction. Med Phys. 2011;38(5):2523‐2534.
Crijns W, Maes F, van der Heide UA, Van den Heuvel F. Calibrating page sized Gafchromic EBT3 films. Med Phys. 2013;40(1):012102.
Poppinga D, Schoenfeld AA, Doerner KJ, Blanck O, Harder D, Poppe B. A new correction method serving to eliminate the parabola effect of flatbed scanners used in radiochromic film dosimetry. Med Phys. 2014;41(2):021707.
Lewis D, Chan MF. Correcting lateral response artifacts from flatbed scanners for radiochromic film dosimetry. Med Phys. 2015;42(1):416‐429.
Lewis DF, Chan MF. Technical note: on GAFChromic EBT‐XD film and the lateral response artifact. Med Phys. 2016;43(2):643‐649.
Akino Y, Shiomi H, Isohashi F, et al. Correction of lateral response artifacts from flatbed scanners for dual‐channel radiochromic film dosimetry. J Radiat Res. 2021;62:319‐328.
Niroomand‐Rad A, Chiu‐Tsao ST, Grams MP, et al. Report of AAPM task group 235 radiochromic film dosimetry: an update to TG‐55. Med Phys. 2020;47:5986‐6025.
Palmer AL, Bradley DA, Nisbet A. Evaluation and mitigation of potential errors in radiochromic film dosimetry due to film curvature at scanning. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015;16(2):5141.
Zomet A, Levin A, Peleg S, Weiss Y. Seamless image stitching by minimizing false edges. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2006;15(4):969‐977.