Indirect functional connectivity does not predict overall survival in glioblastoma.

Disconnections Functional imaging Glioblastoma Survival prediction

Journal

Neurobiology of disease
ISSN: 1095-953X
Titre abrégé: Neurobiol Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9500169

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
30 Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 28 02 2024
revised: 14 04 2024
accepted: 29 04 2024
medline: 3 5 2024
pubmed: 3 5 2024
entrez: 2 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Lesion network mapping (LNM) is a popular framework to assess clinical syndromes following brain injury. The classical approach involves embedding lesions from patients into a normative functional connectome and using the corresponding functional maps as proxies for disconnections. However, previous studies indicated limited predictive power of this approach in behavioral deficits. We hypothesized similarly low predictiveness for overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma (GBM). A retrospective dataset of patients with GBM was included (n = 99). Lesion masks were registered in the normative space to compute disconnectivity maps. The brain functional normative connectome consisted in data from 173 healthy subjects obtained from the Human Connectome Project. A modified version of the LNM was then applied to core regions of GBM masks. Linear regression, classification, and principal component (PCA) analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between disconnectivity and OS. OS was considered both as continuous and categorical (low, intermediate, and high survival) variable. The results revealed no significant associations between OS and network disconnection strength when analyzed at both voxel-wise and classification levels. Moreover, patients stratified into different OS groups did not exhibit significant differences in network connectivity patterns. The spatial similarity among the first PCA of network maps for each OS group suggested a lack of distinctive network patterns associated with survival duration. Compared with indirect structural measures, functional indirect mapping does not provide significant predictive power for OS in patients with GBM. These findings are consistent with previous research that demonstrated the limitations of indirect functional measures in predicting clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for more comprehensive methodologies and a deeper understanding of the factors influencing clinical outcomes in this challenging disease.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Lesion network mapping (LNM) is a popular framework to assess clinical syndromes following brain injury. The classical approach involves embedding lesions from patients into a normative functional connectome and using the corresponding functional maps as proxies for disconnections. However, previous studies indicated limited predictive power of this approach in behavioral deficits. We hypothesized similarly low predictiveness for overall survival (OS) in glioblastoma (GBM).
METHODS METHODS
A retrospective dataset of patients with GBM was included (n = 99). Lesion masks were registered in the normative space to compute disconnectivity maps. The brain functional normative connectome consisted in data from 173 healthy subjects obtained from the Human Connectome Project. A modified version of the LNM was then applied to core regions of GBM masks. Linear regression, classification, and principal component (PCA) analyses were conducted to explore the relationship between disconnectivity and OS. OS was considered both as continuous and categorical (low, intermediate, and high survival) variable.
RESULTS RESULTS
The results revealed no significant associations between OS and network disconnection strength when analyzed at both voxel-wise and classification levels. Moreover, patients stratified into different OS groups did not exhibit significant differences in network connectivity patterns. The spatial similarity among the first PCA of network maps for each OS group suggested a lack of distinctive network patterns associated with survival duration.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Compared with indirect structural measures, functional indirect mapping does not provide significant predictive power for OS in patients with GBM. These findings are consistent with previous research that demonstrated the limitations of indirect functional measures in predicting clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for more comprehensive methodologies and a deeper understanding of the factors influencing clinical outcomes in this challenging disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38697575
pii: S0969-9961(24)00120-7
doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2024.106521
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106521

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest Drs Salvalaggio and Pini and Prof Corbetta reported a patent pending (102022000015360). No other disclosures are reported.

Auteurs

Lorenzo Pini (L)

Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Italy.

Giuseppe Lombardi (G)

Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.

Giulio Sansone (G)

Departments of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Italy.

Matteo Gaiola (M)

Departments of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Italy.

Marta Padovan (M)

Department of Oncology, Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padova, Italy.

Francesco Volpin (F)

Division of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Università di Padova, Padova, Italy.

Luca Denaro (L)

Departments of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Italy.

Maurizio Corbetta (M)

Padova Neuroscience Center, University of Padova, Italy; Departments of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Italy; Veneto institute of Molecular Medicine (VIMM), Padova, Italy.

Alessandro Salvalaggio (A)

Departments of Neuroscience, University of Padova, Italy. Electronic address: alessandro.salvalaggio@unipd.it.

Classifications MeSH