Signs and symptoms of serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain presenting to ambulatory care: a systematic review.

Diagnosis Gastroenterology Systematic reviews

Journal

BJGP open
ISSN: 2398-3795
Titre abrégé: BJGP Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101713531

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 May 2024
Historique:
received: 04 12 2023
revised: 15 03 2024
accepted: 26 03 2024
medline: 3 5 2024
pubmed: 3 5 2024
entrez: 2 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Acute abdominal pain is a common complaint, caused by a variety of conditions, ranging from acutely life-threatening to benign and self-limiting with symptom overlap complicating diagnosis. Signs and symptoms may be valuable when assessing a patient to guide clinical work. Summarising evidence on the accuracy of signs and symptoms for diagnosing serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain in an ambulatory care setting. We performed a systematic review, searching for prospective diagnostic accuracy studies who included adults presenting with acute abdominal pain to an ambulatory care setting. Six databases and guideline registers were searched, using a comprehensive search strategy. We assessed the risk of bias, calculated descriptive statistics and measures of diagnostic accuracy. Results were pooled when at least four studies were available. Out of 18,923 unique studies, 16 studies with moderate to high-risk bias were included. Fourteen clinical features met our criteria, including systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (LR +7.01), shock index >0.85, uterine cervical motion tenderness (LR +5.62 and LR- 8.60) and a self-assessment questionnaire score >70 (LR +12.20) or <25 (LR- 0.19). Clinical diagnosis made by the clinician had the best rule-in ability (LR +24.6). We identified 14 signs and symptoms that can influence the likelihood of a serious illness, including pain characteristics, systemic signs, gynaecological signs and clinician's overall assessment. The risk of bias was moderate to high, leading to uncertainty, preventing us from making firm conclusions. This highlights the need for better research in this setting.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Acute abdominal pain is a common complaint, caused by a variety of conditions, ranging from acutely life-threatening to benign and self-limiting with symptom overlap complicating diagnosis. Signs and symptoms may be valuable when assessing a patient to guide clinical work.
AIM OBJECTIVE
Summarising evidence on the accuracy of signs and symptoms for diagnosing serious illness in adults with acute abdominal pain in an ambulatory care setting.
DESIGN & SETTING METHODS
We performed a systematic review, searching for prospective diagnostic accuracy studies who included adults presenting with acute abdominal pain to an ambulatory care setting.
METHOD METHODS
Six databases and guideline registers were searched, using a comprehensive search strategy. We assessed the risk of bias, calculated descriptive statistics and measures of diagnostic accuracy. Results were pooled when at least four studies were available.
RESULTS RESULTS
Out of 18,923 unique studies, 16 studies with moderate to high-risk bias were included. Fourteen clinical features met our criteria, including systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg (LR +7.01), shock index >0.85, uterine cervical motion tenderness (LR +5.62 and LR- 8.60) and a self-assessment questionnaire score >70 (LR +12.20) or <25 (LR- 0.19). Clinical diagnosis made by the clinician had the best rule-in ability (LR +24.6).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
We identified 14 signs and symptoms that can influence the likelihood of a serious illness, including pain characteristics, systemic signs, gynaecological signs and clinician's overall assessment. The risk of bias was moderate to high, leading to uncertainty, preventing us from making firm conclusions. This highlights the need for better research in this setting.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38697663
pii: BJGPO.2023.0245
doi: 10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0245
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024, The Authors.

Auteurs

Anouk Tans (A)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Anouk.tans@student.kuleuven.be.

Thomas Struyf (T)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Rune Geboers (R)

Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Toon Smeets (T)

Interuniversity Partnership for GP Training, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Yorick Asselbergh (Y)

Interuniversity Partnership for GP Training, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Emmanuel Declerck (E)

Interuniversity Partnership for GP Training, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Luca Bloemen (L)

Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Ann van den Bruel (A)

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Classifications MeSH