Equivalence of variance components between standard and recursive genetic models using LDL' transformations.
Journal
Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE
ISSN: 1297-9686
Titre abrégé: Genet Sel Evol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9114088
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 May 2024
02 May 2024
Historique:
received:
03
10
2023
accepted:
08
04
2024
medline:
3
5
2024
pubmed:
3
5
2024
entrez:
2
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Recursive models are a category of structural equation models that propose a causal relationship between traits. These models are more parameterized than multiple trait models, and they require imposing restrictions on the parameter space to ensure statistical identification. Nevertheless, in certain situations, the likelihood of recursive models and multiple trait models are equivalent. Consequently, the estimates of variance components derived from the multiple trait mixed model can be converted into estimates under several recursive models through LDL' or block-LDL' transformations. The procedure was employed on a dataset comprising five traits (birth weight-BW, weight at 90 days-W90, weight at 210 days-W210, cold carcass weight-CCW and conformation-CON) from the Pirenaica beef cattle breed. These phenotypic records were unequally distributed among 149,029 individuals and had a high percentage of missing data. The pedigree used consisted of 343,753 individuals. A Bayesian approach involving a multiple-trait mixed model was applied using a Gibbs sampler. The variance components obtained at each iteration of the Gibbs sampler were subsequently used to estimate the variance components within three distinct recursive models. The LDL' or block-LDL' transformations applied to the variance component estimates achieved from a multiple trait mixed model enabled inference across multiple sets of recursive models, with the sole prerequisite of being likelihood equivalent. Furthermore, the aforementioned transformations simplify the handling of missing data when conducting inference within the realm of recursive models.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Recursive models are a category of structural equation models that propose a causal relationship between traits. These models are more parameterized than multiple trait models, and they require imposing restrictions on the parameter space to ensure statistical identification. Nevertheless, in certain situations, the likelihood of recursive models and multiple trait models are equivalent. Consequently, the estimates of variance components derived from the multiple trait mixed model can be converted into estimates under several recursive models through LDL' or block-LDL' transformations.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The procedure was employed on a dataset comprising five traits (birth weight-BW, weight at 90 days-W90, weight at 210 days-W210, cold carcass weight-CCW and conformation-CON) from the Pirenaica beef cattle breed. These phenotypic records were unequally distributed among 149,029 individuals and had a high percentage of missing data. The pedigree used consisted of 343,753 individuals. A Bayesian approach involving a multiple-trait mixed model was applied using a Gibbs sampler. The variance components obtained at each iteration of the Gibbs sampler were subsequently used to estimate the variance components within three distinct recursive models.
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
The LDL' or block-LDL' transformations applied to the variance component estimates achieved from a multiple trait mixed model enabled inference across multiple sets of recursive models, with the sole prerequisite of being likelihood equivalent. Furthermore, the aforementioned transformations simplify the handling of missing data when conducting inference within the realm of recursive models.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38698321
doi: 10.1186/s12711-024-00901-x
pii: 10.1186/s12711-024-00901-x
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
33Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Pearl J. Causality: models, reasoning, and inference. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511803161
Gianola D, Sorensen D. Quantitative genetic models for describing simultaneous and recursive relationships between phenotypes. Genetics. 2004;167:1407–24.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.025734
pubmed: 15280252
pmcid: 1470962
De Los CG, Gianola D, Heringstad B. A structural equation model for describing relationships between somatic cell score and milk yield in first-lactation dairy cows. J Dairy Sci. 2006;89:4445–55.
doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72493-6
López De Maturana E, Legarra A, Varona L, Ugarte E. Analysis of fertility and dystocia in holsteins using recursive models to handle censored and categorical data. J Dairy Sci. 2007;90:2012–24.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2005-442
pubmed: 17369243
Valente BD, Rosa GJM, Silva MA, Teixeira RB, Torres RA. Searching for phenotypic causal networks involving complex traits: an application to European quail. Genet Sel Evol. 2011;43:37.
doi: 10.1186/1297-9686-43-37
pubmed: 22047591
pmcid: 3354366
Henderson CR. Applications of linear models in animal breeding. Guelph: University of Guelph; 1984.
Varona L, Sorensen D, Thompson R. Analysis of litter size and average litter weight in pigs using a recursive model. Genetics. 2007;177:1791–9.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.107.077818
pubmed: 17720909
pmcid: 2147959
Tanner MA, Wong WH. The calculation of posterior distributions by data augmentation. J Am Stat Assoc. 1987;82:528–40.
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478458
Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Lourenco D, Aguilar I, Legarra A, Vitezica Z. Manual for BLUPF90 family of programs. Athens: University of Georgia; 2018.
Madsen P, Jensen J, Labouriau R, Christensen OF, Sahana G. DMU—a package for analyzing multivariate mixed models in quantitative genetics and genomics. In: Proceedings of the 10th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production. 17–22 August 2014; Vancouver. 2014.
Meyer K. WOMBAT: a tool for mixed model analyses in quantitative genetics by restricted maximum likelihood (REML). J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2007;8:815–21.
doi: 10.1631/jzus.2007.B0815
pubmed: 17973343
pmcid: 2064953
Varona L, González-Recio O. Invited review: recursive models in animal breeding: interpretation, limitations, and extensions. J Dairy Sci. 2023;106:2198–212.
doi: 10.3168/jds.2022-22578
pubmed: 36870846
Altarriba J, Yagüe G, Moreno C, Varona L. Exploring the possibilities of genetic improvement from traceability data. An example in the Pirenaica beef cattle. Livest Sci. 2009;125:115–20.
doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2009.03.013
Gelfand AE, Smith AFM. Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities. J Am Stat Assoc. 1990;85:398–409.
doi: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213
Van Tassell CP, Van Vleck LD. Multiple-trait Gibbs sampler for animal models: flexible programs for Bayesian and likelihood-based (co)variance component inference. J Anim Sci. 1996;74:2586–97.
doi: 10.2527/1996.74112586x
pubmed: 8923173
Plummer M, Best N, Cowles K, Vines K. CODA: convergence diagnosis and output analysis for MCMC. R News. 2006;6:7–11.
Utrera AR, Van Vleck LD. Heritability estimates for carcass traits of cattle: a review. Genet Mol Res. 2004;3:380–94.
pubmed: 15614729
Valente BD, Rosa GJM, Gianola D, Wu X-L, Weigel K. Is structural equation modeling advantageous for the genetic improvement of multiple traits? Genetics. 2013;194:561–72.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.151209
pubmed: 23608193
pmcid: 3697964
Rosa GJM, Valente BD. BREEDING AND GENETICS SYMPOSIUM: Inferring causal effects from observational data in livestock. J Anim Sci. 2013;91:553–64.
doi: 10.2527/jas.2012-5840
pubmed: 23230107