Virtual consultations: the experience of oncology and palliative care healthcare professionals.


Journal

BMC palliative care
ISSN: 1472-684X
Titre abrégé: BMC Palliat Care
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088685

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 May 2024
Historique:
received: 05 11 2023
accepted: 28 02 2024
medline: 3 5 2024
pubmed: 3 5 2024
entrez: 2 5 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

To maintain continuity of care during the Covid-19 pandemic, virtual consultations (VC) became the mainstay of patient-healthcare practitioner interactions. The aim of this study was to explore the views of oncology and palliative care healthcare professionals (HCPs) regarding the medium of VC. A cross sectional mixed methodology observational study of oncology and palliative care HCPs, analysed via an inductive thematic approach. This was undertaken in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. 87 surveys were completed. Three master themes were identified. Personal, professional, and familial factors including patient age, illness and VC skillset all influenced practitioner's experience of VC. Relationships and connection were highlighted by survey respondents as important influences, with a perception that VC could reduce usual relationships with patients, compared to previous face-to-face consults. There was a perceived loss in these domains with VC. Sharing bad news and having challenging conversations was seen as particularly difficult via VC. Many survey respondents emphasized that they preferred to have first time consultations face-to-face, and not virtually. Within the domain of logistical and practical implications reduced travel and increased accessibility were seen as a significant benefit of VC. The inability to examine patients and concerns regarding missing clinical signs was emphasised as a significant worry, alongside the challenges faced with occasionally failing technology. VC were felt to have a role for those patients who are already known to professionals, where there was an established relationship. VC for difficult discussions and for unstable patients were felt to be inadequate. Triaging patient suitability prior to offering VC, with emphasis on the importance of patient choice, was seen as a priority in this new era of VC.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38698367
doi: 10.1186/s12904-024-01400-y
pii: 10.1186/s12904-024-01400-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

114

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Abel J, Taubert M. Coronavirus pandemic: compassionate communities and information technology. BMJ Supportive Palliat Care. 2020;10:369–71.
doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2020-002330
Zanatta F, Maffoni M, Giardini A, et al. Resilience in palliative healthcare professionals: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer. 2020;28(3):971–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05194-1 .
doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05194-1 pubmed: 31811483
Rehman A, Alharthi K. Introduction to research paradigms. Int J Educ Investigations. 2016;3(8):51–9.
Palinkas LA, Horwitz SM, Green CA, et al. Purposeful sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in mixed method implementation. Adm Policy Mental Health. 2015;42(5):533–44.
doi: 10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Bradbury-Jones C. Enhancing rigour in qualitative health research:exploring subjectivity through Peshkin’s I. J Adv Nurs. 2007;59:290–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04306.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04306.x pubmed: 17590210
Peddle M. Maintaining reflexivity in qualitative nursing research. Nurs Open. 2021;1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/nop2.999 .
Braun V, Clarke. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Re-search Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Sutton J, Austin Z. Qualitative research: Data Collection, Analysis, and management. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2015;68(3):226–31. https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1456 .
doi: 10.4212/cjhp.v68i3.1456 pubmed: 26157184 pmcid: 4485510
Murphy A, Kirby A, Lawlor A, et al. Mitigating the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Adult Cancer patients through Telehealth Adoption: a systematic review. Sens (Basel). 2002;2(9):3598. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093598 .
doi: 10.3390/s22093598
Greenhalgh T. Using virtual consultations in the fight against COVID 19 [online].2020. https://www.health.org.uk/news-and-comment/newsletter-features/using-virtual-consultations-in-the-fight-against-covid-19 (accessed 07/03/2023).

Auteurs

Heledd Lewis (H)

Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK. heledd.lewis@wales.nhs.uk.

Mark Taubert (M)

Velindre University NHS Trust, Cardiff, CF14 2TL, UK.

Annmarie Nelson (A)

School of Medicine, Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Centre, Cardiff, UK.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH