Sequential administration of peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA for the treatment of chronic migraine and other headache disorders-A retrospective tolerability and safety study.
local anesthetics
migraine
nerve blocks
onabotulinumtoxinA
safety
Journal
Headache
ISSN: 1526-4610
Titre abrégé: Headache
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 2985091R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 May 2024
03 May 2024
Historique:
revised:
22
02
2024
received:
21
10
2023
accepted:
22
02
2024
medline:
3
5
2024
pubmed:
3
5
2024
entrez:
3
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
To determine the tolerability and safety of concurrent peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA treatment during a single outpatient clinic procedure visit. Procedural interventions are available for the treatment of headache disorders. OnabotulinumtoxinA and peripheral nerve blocks are used as alternatives or in addition to oral therapies to reduce the frequency and intensity of migraine attacks. There is currently a lack of safety data focusing on the sequential administration of local anesthetic via peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA during a single clinical encounter for the treatment of headache. The primary aim of the study was to determine the safety and tolerability of concurrent peripheral nerve blockade and onabotulinumtoxinA injections during a single outpatient clinic procedure visit. We hypothesized that the dual intervention would be safe and well tolerated by patients with chronic migraine and other headache disorders. A retrospective chart review was performed using clinical data from patients seen by multiple providers over a 16-month timeframe at one outpatient headache clinic. Patients were identified by procedure codes and those receiving peripheral nerve block(s) and onabotulinumtoxinA injections during a single encounter within the study period were eligible for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients 18 years and older who were (2) receiving both peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA injections for the treatment of chronic migraine. Patients were excluded if they were under age 18, received their procedure outside of the clinic (emergency room, inpatient ward), or were receiving sphenopalatine ganglion blocks. Age- and sex-matched patients who received one procedure, either peripheral nerve blocks or onabotulinumtoxinA, were used for control. The primary outcome of this safety study was the number of adverse events that occurred in the dual intervention group compared to the single intervention control arms. Information regarding adverse events was gathered via retrospective chart review. If an adverse event was recorded, it was then graded by the reviewer utilizing the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ranging from Grade 1 Mild Event to Grade 5 Death. Additionally, it was noted whether the adverse event led to treatment discontinuation. In total, 375 patients were considered eligible for inclusion in the study. After age and sex matching of controls, 131 patients receiving dual intervention were able to be compared to 131 patients receiving onabotulinumtoxinA alone and 104 patients receiving dual intervention were able to be compared to 104 patients receiving peripheral nerve block(s) alone. The primary endpoint analysis showed no significant difference in total adverse events between dual intervention compared to nerve blocks alone or onabotulinumtoxinA alone. The number of adverse events that led to treatment discontinuation approached but did not reach statistical significance for those receiving dual intervention versus onabotulinumtoxinA alone in the number of adverse events that led to treatment termination (4.6%, 6/131 vs. 0.8%, 1/131, p = 0.065); however, the number of patients who discontinued therapy was not significantly different between those groups (2.3%, 3/131 vs. 0.8%, 1/131; p = 0.314; odds ratio 0.3 [0-3.2]; p = 0.338). In this retrospective chart review, there was no significant difference in adverse events or therapy discontinuation between patients receiving sequential peripheral nerve block(s) and onabotulinumtoxinA injections versus those receiving either peripheral nerve block(s) or onabotulinumtoxinA injections alone. As a result, we concluded that the combination procedure is likely safe and well tolerated in routine clinical practice.
Sections du résumé
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
To determine the tolerability and safety of concurrent peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA treatment during a single outpatient clinic procedure visit.
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Procedural interventions are available for the treatment of headache disorders. OnabotulinumtoxinA and peripheral nerve blocks are used as alternatives or in addition to oral therapies to reduce the frequency and intensity of migraine attacks. There is currently a lack of safety data focusing on the sequential administration of local anesthetic via peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA during a single clinical encounter for the treatment of headache. The primary aim of the study was to determine the safety and tolerability of concurrent peripheral nerve blockade and onabotulinumtoxinA injections during a single outpatient clinic procedure visit. We hypothesized that the dual intervention would be safe and well tolerated by patients with chronic migraine and other headache disorders.
METHODS
METHODS
A retrospective chart review was performed using clinical data from patients seen by multiple providers over a 16-month timeframe at one outpatient headache clinic. Patients were identified by procedure codes and those receiving peripheral nerve block(s) and onabotulinumtoxinA injections during a single encounter within the study period were eligible for inclusion. Inclusion criteria were (1) patients 18 years and older who were (2) receiving both peripheral nerve blocks and onabotulinumtoxinA injections for the treatment of chronic migraine. Patients were excluded if they were under age 18, received their procedure outside of the clinic (emergency room, inpatient ward), or were receiving sphenopalatine ganglion blocks. Age- and sex-matched patients who received one procedure, either peripheral nerve blocks or onabotulinumtoxinA, were used for control. The primary outcome of this safety study was the number of adverse events that occurred in the dual intervention group compared to the single intervention control arms. Information regarding adverse events was gathered via retrospective chart review. If an adverse event was recorded, it was then graded by the reviewer utilizing the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ranging from Grade 1 Mild Event to Grade 5 Death. Additionally, it was noted whether the adverse event led to treatment discontinuation.
RESULTS
RESULTS
In total, 375 patients were considered eligible for inclusion in the study. After age and sex matching of controls, 131 patients receiving dual intervention were able to be compared to 131 patients receiving onabotulinumtoxinA alone and 104 patients receiving dual intervention were able to be compared to 104 patients receiving peripheral nerve block(s) alone. The primary endpoint analysis showed no significant difference in total adverse events between dual intervention compared to nerve blocks alone or onabotulinumtoxinA alone. The number of adverse events that led to treatment discontinuation approached but did not reach statistical significance for those receiving dual intervention versus onabotulinumtoxinA alone in the number of adverse events that led to treatment termination (4.6%, 6/131 vs. 0.8%, 1/131, p = 0.065); however, the number of patients who discontinued therapy was not significantly different between those groups (2.3%, 3/131 vs. 0.8%, 1/131; p = 0.314; odds ratio 0.3 [0-3.2]; p = 0.338).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
In this retrospective chart review, there was no significant difference in adverse events or therapy discontinuation between patients receiving sequential peripheral nerve block(s) and onabotulinumtoxinA injections versus those receiving either peripheral nerve block(s) or onabotulinumtoxinA injections alone. As a result, we concluded that the combination procedure is likely safe and well tolerated in routine clinical practice.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 American Headache Society.
Références
Aurora SK, Dodick DW, Turkel CC, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT 1 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(7):793‐803. doi:10.1177/0333102410364676
Diener HC, Dodick DW, Aurora SK, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phase of the PREEMPT 2 trial. Cephalalgia. 2010;30(7):804‐814. doi:10.1177/0333102410364677
Dodick DW, Turkel CC, DeGryse RE, et al. OnabotulinumtoxinA for treatment of chronic migraine: pooled results from the double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled phases of the PREEMPT clinical program. Headache. 2010;50(6):921‐936. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01678.x
Stern JI, Chiang CC, Kissoon NR, Robertson CE. Narrative review of peripheral nerve blocks for the management of headache. Headache. 2022;62(9):1077‐1092. doi:10.1111/head.14385
Shauly O, Gould DJ, Sahai‐Srivastava S, Patel KM. Greater occipital nerve block for the treatment of chronic migraine headaches: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019;144(4):943‐952. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006059
Gupta R, Fisher K, Pyati S. Chronic headache: a review of interventional treatment strategies in headache management. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23(9):68. doi:10.1007/s11916-019-0806-9
Barad M, Ailani J, Hakim SM, Kissoon NR, Schuster NM. Percutaneous interventional strategies for migraine prevention: a systematic review and practice guideline. Pain Med. 2022;23(1):164‐188. doi:10.1093/pm/pnab236
Kleen JK, Levin M. Injection therapy for headache and facial pain. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2016;28(3):423‐434. doi:10.1016/j.coms.2016.04.002
Blumenfeld A, Ashkenazi A, Napchan U, et al. Expert consensus recommendations for the performance of peripheral nerve blocks for headaches—a narrative review. Headache. 2013;53(3):437‐446. doi:10.1111/head.12053
National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). https://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/ctc.htm#ctc_40
Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata‐driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377‐381. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, et al. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform. 2019;95:103208. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
Li M, Goldberger BA, Hopkins C. Fatal case of BOTOX‐related anaphylaxis? J Forensic Sci. 2005;50(1):169‐172.
de Ru JA, Buwalda J. Botulinum toxin a injection into corrugator muscle for frontally localised chronic daily headache or chronic tension‐type headache. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(4):412‐417. doi:10.1017/S0022215108003198
Güleç AT. Dilution of botulinum toxin a in lidocaine vs. in normal saline for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: a double‐blind, randomized, comparative preliminary study. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(3):314‐318. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2011.04066.x
Yen MT, Wall VK. Bupivacaine‐induced myotoxicity and its effect on botulinum toxin paresis. Ann Plast Surg. 2008;60(1):6‐9. doi:10.1097/SAP.0b013e318045a083
Mori R, Vasavada S, Baker D, Sabanegh E. Treatment of debilitating cremasteric synkinesia with intracremasteric botulinum‐A toxin injections. Urology. 2011;78(1):214‐216. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.03.011
Picelli A, Battistuzzi E, Filippetti M, et al. Diagnostic nerve block in prediction of outcome of botulinum toxin treatment for spastic equinovarus foot after stroke: a retrospective observational study. J Rehabil Med. 2020;52(6):jrm00069. doi:10.2340/16501977-2693
Crary MA, Glowasky AL. Using botulinum toxin a to improve speech and swallowing function following total laryngectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(7):760‐763. doi:10.1001/archotol.1996.01890190056013
Brown L, Taylor D, Weiss E. Predictive techniques for neurotoxin outcomes. Dermatol Surg. 2018;44(5):721‐725. doi:10.1097/DSS.0000000000001439
Pacik PT, Geletta S. Vaginismus treatment: clinical trials follow up 241 patients. Sex Med. 2017;5(2):e114‐e123. doi:10.1016/j.esxm.2017.02.002
Rosbach M, Andersen JS. Patient‐experienced burden of treatment in patients with multimorbidity—a systematic review of qualitative data. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(6):e0179916. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179916