Efficacy of electronic apex locators in comparison with intraoral radiographs in working length determination- a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Apex locator
Endodontic
Radiographs
Root canal treatment
Working lengt
Journal
BMC oral health
ISSN: 1472-6831
Titre abrégé: BMC Oral Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101088684
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 May 2024
04 May 2024
Historique:
received:
24
12
2023
accepted:
13
04
2024
medline:
5
5
2024
pubmed:
5
5
2024
entrez:
4
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Successful endodontic treatment needs accurate determination of working length (WL). Electronic apex locators (EALs) were presented as an alternative to radiographic methods; and since then, they have evolved and gained popularity in the determination of WL. However, there is insufficient evidence on the post-operative pain, adequacy, and accuracy of EALs in determining WL. The systematic review and meta-analysis aims to gather evidence regarding the effectiveness of EALs for WL determination when compared to different imaging techniques along with postoperative pain associated with WL determination, the number of radiographs taken during the procedure, the time taken, and the adverse effects. For the review, clinical studies with cross-over and parallel-arm randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in seven electronic databases, followed by cross-referencing of the selected studies and related research synthesis. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment was carried out with Cochrane's RoB tool and a random-effects model was used. The meta-analysis was performed with the RevMan software 5.4.1. Eleven eligible RCTs were incorporated into the review and eight RCTs into the meta-analysis, of which five had high RoB and the remaining six had unclear RoB. Following meta-analysis, no significant difference in postoperative pain was found among the EAL and radiograph groups (SMD 0.00, CI .29 to .28, 354 participants; P value = 0.98). Radiograph group showed better WL accuracy (SMD 0.55, CI .11 to .99, 254 participants; P value = 0.02), while the EAL group had 10% better WL adequacy (RR 1.10, CI 1.03-1.18, 573 participants; P value = 0.006). We found very low-certainty evidence to support the efficacy of different types of EAL compared to radiography for the outcomes tested. We were unable to reach any conclusions about the superiority of any type of EAL. Well-planned RCTs need to be conducted by standardizing the outcomes and outcome measurement methods.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Successful endodontic treatment needs accurate determination of working length (WL). Electronic apex locators (EALs) were presented as an alternative to radiographic methods; and since then, they have evolved and gained popularity in the determination of WL. However, there is insufficient evidence on the post-operative pain, adequacy, and accuracy of EALs in determining WL.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
The systematic review and meta-analysis aims to gather evidence regarding the effectiveness of EALs for WL determination when compared to different imaging techniques along with postoperative pain associated with WL determination, the number of radiographs taken during the procedure, the time taken, and the adverse effects.
METHODS
METHODS
For the review, clinical studies with cross-over and parallel-arm randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were searched in seven electronic databases, followed by cross-referencing of the selected studies and related research synthesis. Risk of bias (RoB) assessment was carried out with Cochrane's RoB tool and a random-effects model was used. The meta-analysis was performed with the RevMan software 5.4.1.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Eleven eligible RCTs were incorporated into the review and eight RCTs into the meta-analysis, of which five had high RoB and the remaining six had unclear RoB. Following meta-analysis, no significant difference in postoperative pain was found among the EAL and radiograph groups (SMD 0.00, CI .29 to .28, 354 participants; P value = 0.98). Radiograph group showed better WL accuracy (SMD 0.55, CI .11 to .99, 254 participants; P value = 0.02), while the EAL group had 10% better WL adequacy (RR 1.10, CI 1.03-1.18, 573 participants; P value = 0.006).
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
We found very low-certainty evidence to support the efficacy of different types of EAL compared to radiography for the outcomes tested. We were unable to reach any conclusions about the superiority of any type of EAL. Well-planned RCTs need to be conducted by standardizing the outcomes and outcome measurement methods.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38704529
doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04259-w
pii: 10.1186/s12903-024-04259-w
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Systematic Review
Meta-Analysis
Comparative Study
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
532Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Rajamanickam K, Teja KV, Ramesh S, AbuMelha AS, Alkahtany MF, Almadi KH, et al. Comparative Study Assessing the Canal Cleanliness Using Automated Device and Conventional Syringe Needle for Root Canal Irrigation—An Ex-Vivo Study. Materials. 2022;15:6184.
pubmed: 36143496
pmcid: 9504894
doi: 10.3390/ma15186184
Teja KV, Janani K, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Jose J, Marya A, et al. Comparison of Herbal Agents with Sodium Hypochlorite as Root Canal Irrigant: A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2021;2021:1–11.
doi: 10.1155/2021/8967219
Mousa MA, Alshammari AM, Alshammari AZ, Alsharari MM, Baig MN, Srivastava KC, et al. Comparative Evaluation of Adequacy of Root Canal Treatment Performed by Interns and Undergraduate Dental Students—A Cross-Sectional. Retrospective Study Applied Sciences. 2022;12:9079.
doi: 10.3390/app12189079
Janani K, Teja KV, Srivatsava KC. How much to enlarge? A letter to the editor. Saudi Endodontic Journal. 2023;13:288–9.
doi: 10.4103/sej.sej_43_23
Endodontists AA of. Glossary of endodontic terms. American Association of Endodontists; 2003.
Ricucci L. Apical limit of root canal instrumentation and obturation, part 2. A histological study Int Endod J. 1998;31:394–409.
pubmed: 15551607
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.1998.00183.x
Iqbal A, Karobari MI, Alam MK, Khattak O, Alshammari SM, Adil AH, et al. Evaluation of root canal morphology in permanent maxillary and mandibular anterior teeth in Saudi subpopulation using two classification systems: a CBCT study. BMC Oral Health. 2022;22:171.
pubmed: 35538514
pmcid: 9092761
doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02187-1
Malkhassian G,Plazas A, Nahmias Y. Electronic Apex Locators and conventional radiographs in working length measurement. 2nd Ed. Edited by Bettina Basrani. New Jersey: Wiley and Blackwell. 2012. p. 218–34.
Teja KV, Janani K, Alqahtani AA, Robaian A, Alhalabi F, Merdad KA, et al. Herbal Agents versus Ethylene Diamine Tetra Acetic Acid on Removal of the Smear Layer—A Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19:6870.
pubmed: 35682452
pmcid: 9180677
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116870
Schilder H. Filling root canals in three dimensions. Dent Clin North Am. 1967;11:723–44.
doi: 10.1016/S0011-8532(22)03244-X
Seltzer S, Soltanoff W, Sinai I, Smith J. Biologic aspects of endodontics: IV Periapical tissue reactions to root-filled teeth whose canals had been instrumented short of their apices. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology. 1969;28:724–38.
pubmed: 4981194
doi: 10.1016/0030-4220(69)90421-6
Teja KV, Janani K, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Natoli V, Di Blasio M, et al. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of different combinations of calcium hydroxide against Enterococcus faecalis. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23:849.
pubmed: 37951871
pmcid: 10638705
doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03552-4
Dummer PMH, Mcginn JH, Rees DG. The position and topography of the apical canal constriction and apical foramen. Int Endod J. 1984;17:192–8.
pubmed: 6593303
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1984.tb00404.x
Jose J, Teja KV, Ranjan M, Mohamed RN, Alam MK, Shrivastava D, et al. Influence of Commonly Used Endodontic Irrigants on the Setting Time and Metal Composition of Various Base Endodontic Sealers. Polymers (Basel). 2021;14:27.
pubmed: 35012047
doi: 10.3390/polym14010027
Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Austin RD. Journey towards the 3D dental imaging-the milestones in the advancement of dental imaging. Int J Adv Res. 2016;4:377–82.
doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/2405
Grove CJ. Further evidence that root canals can be filled to the dentinocemental junction. J Am Dent Assoc. 1922;1930(17):1529–35.
Kuttler Y. Microscopic investigation of root apexes. J Am Dent Assoc. 1955;50:544–52.
pubmed: 14366934
doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.1955.0099
ASushanth A, Srivastava KC, Shrivastava D, Hosni HA, Khan ZA, Al-Johani K, et al. Recommendations, Practices and Infrastructural Model for the Dental Radiology Set-up in Clinical and Academic Institutions in the COVID-19 Era. Biology (Basel). 2020;9:334.
ElAyouti A, Dima E, Ohmer J, Sperl K, von Ohle C, Löst C. Consistency of apex locator function: a clinical study. J Endod. 2009;35:179–81.
pubmed: 19166768
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.10.017
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, Clarke M, Devereaux PJ, Kleijnen J, Moher D. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ. 2009;339:b2700.
Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions.
Ouzzani M, Hammady H, Fedorowicz Z, Elmagarmid A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5:1–10.
doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4
Kara Tuncer A, Gerek M. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or digital radiography on postoperative pain: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2014;40(1):38–41.
pubmed: 24331988
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.08.004
Naeem F, Abdelaziz S, Ahmed Geraldine M. Evaluation of postoperative pain after working length determination using electronic apex locator versus digital radiography in multirooted teeth. a randomized controlled trial. Int J Adv Res (Indore). 2017;5:799–809.
doi: 10.21474/IJAR01/5589
Vanitha S, Sherwood IA. Comparison of three different apex locators in determining the working length of mandibular first molar teeth with irreversible pulpitis compared with an intraoral periapical radiograph: A block randomized, controlled, clinical trial. J Investig Clin Dent. 2019;10: e12408.
pubmed: 30838781
doi: 10.1111/jicd.12408
Rathore K, Tandon S, Sharma M, Kalia G, Shekhawat T, Chundawat Y. Comparison of accuracy of apex locator with tactile and conventional radiographic method for working length determination in primary and permanent teeth. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13:235.
pubmed: 32904087
pmcid: 7450193
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1768
Singh D, Tyagi SP, Gupta S, Jain A. Comparative evaluation of adequacy of final working length after using Raypex5 or radiography: An: in vivo: study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2015;33:208–12.
pubmed: 26156274
doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.160363
Jarad FD, Albadri S, Gamble C, Burnside G, Fox K, Ashley JR, et al. Working length determination in general dental practice: a randomised controlled trial. Br Dent J. 2011;211:595–8.
pubmed: 22193485
doi: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2011.1052
Ravanshad S, Adl A, Anvar J. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locator or radiography on the adequacy of final working length: a randomized clinical trial. J Endod. 2010;36:1753–6.
pubmed: 20951282
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.08.017
Saraf PA, Ratnakar P, Patil TN, Penukonda R, Kamatagi L, Vanaki SS. A comparative clinical evaluation of accuracy of six apex locators with intraoral periapical radiograph in multirooted teeth: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2017;20(4):264–8.
pubmed: 29259365
pmcid: 5721510
doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_131_17
Koçak S, Koçak MM, Sağlam BC. Efficiency of 2 electronic apex locators on working length determination: A clinical study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. 2013;16:229–32.
doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.111320
Joseph M. Clinical success of two working length determination techniques: a randomized controlled trial. Madha Dental College, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Chennai; 2019.
Khan A, Afridi F, Iqbal K. Effect of working length measurement by electronic apex locater and digital radiography on post-operative pain dissipation. dimensions. 2021;5:5.
Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Jüni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. Bmj. 2011;343.
Paludo L, de Souza SL, Só MVR, da Rosa RA, Vier-Pelisser FV, Duarte MAH. An in vivo radiographic evaluation of the accuracy of Apex and iPex electronic Apex locators. Braz Dent J. 2012;23:54–8.
pubmed: 22460316
doi: 10.1590/S0103-64402012000100010
Keller ME, Brown CE Jr, Newton CW. A clinical evaluation of the Endocater—an electronic apex locator. J Endod. 1991;17:271–4.
pubmed: 1940752
doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81865-0
Orosco FA, Bernardineli N, Garcia RB, Bramante CM, Duarte MAH, de Moraes IG. In vivo accuracy of conventional and digital radiographic methods in confirming root canal working length determination by Root ZX. J Appl Oral Sci. 2012;20:522–5.
pubmed: 23138737
pmcid: 3881798
doi: 10.1590/S1678-77572012000500005
Thomas AS, Hartwell GR, Moon PC. The accuracy of the Root ZX electronic apex locator using stainless-steel and nickel-titanium files. J Endod. 2003;29:662–3.
pubmed: 14606791
doi: 10.1097/00004770-200310000-00012
Hembrough JH, Weine FS, Pisano JV, Eskoz N. Accuracy of an electronic apex locator: a clinical evaluation in maxillary molars. J Endod. 1993;19:242–6.
pubmed: 8360602
doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81300-2
Fouad AF. The use of electronic apex locators in endodontic therapy. Int Endod J. 1993;26:13–4.
pubmed: 8473026
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1993.tb00535.x
Cardoso Tarallo A, De souza Matos F, Bresciani E, Paranhos LR, Ribeiro Camargo CH. Influence of Working Length on Post-operative Pain after Single or Two-Visit Endodontic Treatment: A Randomised Clinical Trial. J Clin Diagn Res. 2018;12(10):ZC06–ZC11
Diniz-de-Figueiredo FE, Lima LF, Oliveira LS, Bernardino IM, Paiva SM, Faria-e-Silva AL. The impact of two root canal treatment protocols on the oral health-related quality of life: a randomized controlled pragmatic clinical trial. Int Endod J. 2020;53:1327–38.
pubmed: 32619274
doi: 10.1111/iej.13356
Himel VT, Cain C. An evaluation of two electronic apex locators in a dental student clinic. Quintessence Int (Berl). 1993;24.
Boris Saha, Surendra kumar Mishra. Effect of three different methods of working length determination during root canal preparation on post operative pain - An in vivo study. 2019. https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=CTRI/2019/07/019960 . Accessed 31 Mar 2024.
Chang-xi LU. Comparison of the accuracy of measuring root canal working length in 3 different ways. Shanghai Journal of Stomatology. 2017;26:535.
Vachey E, Lemagnen G, Grislain L, Miquel JL. Alternatives to radiography for determining root canal length. Odontostomatol Trop. 2003;26:15–8.
pubmed: 14705373
Dehon P, Van Nieuwenhuysen JP. Electronic determination of the length of the root canal. Rev Belge Med Dent. 1984;1999(54):259–81.
Einbinder AB, Kratchman SI. Apex locators: a systematic approach for usage. Compendium. 1993;14:34–8.
pubmed: 8477424
McDonald NJ. Radiographic and electronic diagnostic systems. Alpha Omegan. 1991;84:45–8.
pubmed: 1819963
Ott KH, Pioch T, Hoppe W. Study of properties of electrical root canal length measuring instruments. ZWR. 1991;100:313–4.
pubmed: 1882577
Dotto RF, Renner D, Barletta FB, Dotto SR, Wagner MH. Avaliação da determinação do comprimento de trabalho através do localizador apical eletrônico NOVAPEX. Rev odontol Univ Cid Sao Paulo. 2005;:263–9.
Vladimirov SB, Filipov IA, Vangelov LS. Electrometric determination of the working length of root canals by means of Apex locator. Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2001;43:42–5.
pubmed: 15354466
Chugal NM, Clive JM, Spångberg LSW. Endodontic infection: some biologic and treatment factors associated with outcome. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology. 2003;96:81–90.
pubmed: 12847449
doi: 10.1016/S1079-2104(02)91703-8
Williams CB, Joyce AP, Roberts S. A comparison between in vivo radiographic working length determination and measurement after extraction. J Endod. 2006;32:624–7.
pubmed: 16793467
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2005.10.044
Ganesh VS, Venkatesh KV, Sihivahanan D, Yadalam PK, Shrivastava D, Srivastava KC. Effect of microbubble as local drug delivery system in endodontic management - An In-Vitro study. Saudi Dent J. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.03.010 .
doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2024.03.010
Martins JNR, Marques D, Mata A, Caramês J. Clinical efficacy of electronic apex locators: systematic review. J Endod. 2014;40:759–77.
pubmed: 24862702
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2014.03.011
Endodontology ES, of. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J. 2006;39:921–30.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01180.x
ElAyouti A, Connert T, Dummer P, Löst C. A critical analysis of research methods and experimental models to study working length determination and the performance of apex locators–A narrative review with recommendations for the future. Int Endod J. 2022;55:281–94.
pubmed: 35347726
doi: 10.1111/iej.13738
Yl N. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endod J. 2011;44:583–609.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2011.01872.x
Meirinhos J, Martins JNR, Pereira B, Baruwa A, Gouveia J, Quaresma SA, et al. Prevalence of apical periodontitis and its association with previous root canal treatment, root canal filling length and type of coronal restoration–a cross-sectional study. Int Endod J. 2020;53:573–84.
pubmed: 31749154
doi: 10.1111/iej.13256
McKenzie JE, Brennan SE, Ryan RE, Thomson HJ, Johnston R V, Thomas J. Defining the criteria for including studies and how they will be grouped for the synthesis. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. 2019;:33–65.
Gordon MPJ, Chandler NP. Electronic apex locators. Int Endod J. 2004;37:425–37.
pubmed: 15189431
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00835.x
Fouad AF, Krell KV, McKendry DJ, Koorbusch GF, Olson RA. A clinical evaluation of five electronic root canal length measuring instruments. J Endod. 1990;16:446–9.
pubmed: 2098464
doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81889-3
Amin J, Lines J, Milosevic MP, Park A, Sholapurkar A. Comparison of accuracy and reliability of working length determination using cone beam computed tomography and electronic apex locator: a systematic review. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2019;20:1118–23.
pubmed: 31797839
doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2651
Fouad AF, Reid LC. Effect of using electronic apex locators on selected endodontic treatment parameters. J Endod. 2000;26:364–7.
pubmed: 11199756
doi: 10.1097/00004770-200006000-00013
Smadi L. Comparison between two methods of working length determination and its effect on radiographic extent of root canal filling: a clinical study [ISRCTN71486641]. BMC Oral Health. 2006;6:1–6.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6831-6-4
Vajrabhaya L, Tepmongkol P. Accuracy of apex locator. Dent Traumatol. 1997;13:180–2.
doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1997.tb00035.x
Brunton PA, Abdeen D, Macfarlane TV. The effect of an apex locator on exposure to radiation during endodontic therapy. J Endod. 2002;28:524–6.
pubmed: 12126381
doi: 10.1097/00004770-200207000-00009
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, CONSORT, et al. explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010;2010:340.
Williamson PR, Altman DG, Bagley H, Barnes KL, Blazeby JM, Brookes ST, et al. The COMET handbook: version 1.0. Trials. 2017;18:1–50.
doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1978-4