Probe motion during mid-trimester fetal anomaly scan in the clinical setting: A prospective observational study.
Anomaly scans
Fetal ultrasound
Metrics
Obstetrics
Pregnancy
Probe trajectory
Screening
Trajectory
Journal
European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology
ISSN: 1872-7654
Titre abrégé: Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 0375672
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 May 2024
03 May 2024
Historique:
received:
13
11
2023
revised:
11
04
2024
accepted:
29
04
2024
medline:
6
5
2024
pubmed:
6
5
2024
entrez:
5
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study aims to investigate probe motion during full mid-trimester anomaly scans. We undertook a prospective, observational study of obstetric sonographers at a UK University Teaching Hospital. We collected prospectively full-length video recordings of routine second-trimester anomaly scans synchronized with probe trajectory tracking data during the scan. Videos were reviewed and trajectories analyzed using duration, path metrics (path length, velocity, acceleration, jerk, and volume) and angular metrics (spectral arc, angular area, angular velocity, angular acceleration, and angular jerk). These trajectories were then compared according to the participant level of expertise, fetal presentation, and patient BMI. A total of 17 anomaly scans were recorded. The average velocity of the probe was 12.9 ± 3.4 mm/s for the consultants versus 24.6 ± 5.7 mm/s for the fellows (p = 0.02), the average acceleration 170.4 ± 26.3 mm/s Some differences in the probe path metrics (velocity, acceleration, jerk and working volume) were noticed according to operator's level.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38705008
pii: S0301-2115(24)00217-3
doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2024.04.042
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
13-17Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.