Morphometric Analysis of Cervical Neuroforaminal Dimensions from C2-T1 Using Computed Tomography of 1,000 Patients.

anatomy cervical computed tomography ethnicity neuroforamina race

Journal

The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society
ISSN: 1878-1632
Titre abrégé: Spine J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101130732

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 May 2024
Historique:
received: 11 12 2023
revised: 22 04 2024
accepted: 01 05 2024
medline: 6 5 2024
pubmed: 6 5 2024
entrez: 5 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Race and sex differences are not consistently reported in the literature. Fundamentally, anatomical differences of cervical neuroforaminal dimensions (CNFD) amongst these groups would be important to know. To establish normative radiographic morphometric measurements of CNFD and uncover the influence of patient sex, race, and ethnicity while also considering anthropometric characteristics. Retrospective radiographic morphometric study. 1,000 patients between 18 and 35 years of age who were free of spinal pathology. Foraminal height, axial width, and area of cervical neural foramen. Cervical CTs were reviewed to measure CNFD, defined as follows: foraminal height, axial width, and area. Statistical analyses were performed to assess associations between CNFD, and patient height, weight, sex, race, and ethnicity. CNFD measurements followed a bimodal distribution pattern moving caudally from C2-T1. Irrespective of disc level, cervical CNFD were as follows: left and right widths of 6.6 ± 1.5 and 6.6 ± 1.5 mm, heights of 9.4 ± 2.4 and 9.4 ± 3.2 mm, and areas of 60.0 ± 19.5 and 60.6 ± 20.7 mm This study describes 36,000 normative measurements of 12,000 foramina from C2-T1. CNFD measurements vary based on disc level, but not laterality. Contrasting left- versus right-sided neuroforamina of the same level may aid in determining the presence of unilateral stenosis. Patient sex, race, and ethnicity are associated with CNFD, while patient anthropometric factors are weakly correlated with CNFD.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Race and sex differences are not consistently reported in the literature. Fundamentally, anatomical differences of cervical neuroforaminal dimensions (CNFD) amongst these groups would be important to know.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
To establish normative radiographic morphometric measurements of CNFD and uncover the influence of patient sex, race, and ethnicity while also considering anthropometric characteristics.
STUDY DESIGN METHODS
Retrospective radiographic morphometric study.
PATIENT SAMPLE METHODS
1,000 patients between 18 and 35 years of age who were free of spinal pathology.
OUTCOME MEASURES METHODS
Foraminal height, axial width, and area of cervical neural foramen.
METHODS METHODS
Cervical CTs were reviewed to measure CNFD, defined as follows: foraminal height, axial width, and area. Statistical analyses were performed to assess associations between CNFD, and patient height, weight, sex, race, and ethnicity.
RESULTS RESULTS
CNFD measurements followed a bimodal distribution pattern moving caudally from C2-T1. Irrespective of disc level, cervical CNFD were as follows: left and right widths of 6.6 ± 1.5 and 6.6 ± 1.5 mm, heights of 9.4 ± 2.4 and 9.4 ± 3.2 mm, and areas of 60.0 ± 19.5 and 60.6 ± 20.7 mm
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
This study describes 36,000 normative measurements of 12,000 foramina from C2-T1. CNFD measurements vary based on disc level, but not laterality. Contrasting left- versus right-sided neuroforamina of the same level may aid in determining the presence of unilateral stenosis. Patient sex, race, and ethnicity are associated with CNFD, while patient anthropometric factors are weakly correlated with CNFD.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38705281
pii: S1529-9430(24)00219-5
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.05.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Jacob Razzouk (J)

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Trevor Case (T)

California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, CA, USA.

Ethan Vyhmeister (E)

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Kai Nguyen (K)

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Davis Carter (D)

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Mei Carter (M)

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Grant Sajdak (G)

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Mikayla Kricfalusi (M)

California University of Science and Medicine, Colton, CA, USA.

Rachel Taylor (R)

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Derran Bedward (D)

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

David Shin (D)

Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Nathaniel Wycliffe (N)

Department of Radiology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Omar Ramos (O)

Twin Cities Spine Center, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

Shaina A Lipa (SA)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Christopher M Bono (CM)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Wayne Cheng (W)

Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Jerry L. Pettis Memorial Veterans Hospital, Loma Linda, CA, USA.

Olumide Danisa (O)

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA. Electronic address: odanisa@yahoo.com.

Classifications MeSH