Postnatal care provided by UK midwifery units and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic: A survey using the UK Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS).
Journal
Heliyon
ISSN: 2405-8440
Titre abrégé: Heliyon
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101672560
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
15 May 2024
15 May 2024
Historique:
received:
08
11
2023
revised:
16
04
2024
accepted:
17
04
2024
medline:
6
5
2024
pubmed:
6
5
2024
entrez:
6
5
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Postnatal care supports healthy transitions to parenthood, mother-infant relationships, and breastfeeding establishment. Highly valued by women and families, it is often an area where parents report low satisfaction compared with other areas of maternity care. Most research about postnatal care is hospital-focused. Little is known about postnatal services provided by midwifery units, and any changes to this provision since the COVID-19 pandemic. To describe postnatal care services provided by UK midwifery units and examine the extent to which provision was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. We carried out a national survey online between January-June 2022 using the United Kingdom Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS). We asked about postnatal care provision in alongside midwifery units (AMU) and freestanding midwifery units (FMU), before the COVID-19 pandemic (July-December 2019) and shortly after restrictions were eased (January-June 2022). Overall 131 (67 %) midwifery units responded to the survey, 76 (62 %) AMUs and 55 (75 %) FMUs, from 75 % of eligible NHS organisations. In 2022, 66 % of AMUs reported that women typically stayed for 6-24 h after a straightforward birth, while 70 % of FMUs reported typical postnatal stays of <6 h. For 2019, significantly more FMUs reported providing outpatient postnatal services compared with AMUs (98 % vs 57 %, p < 0.001). From 2019 to 2022 there were significant reductions in partners staying overnight in midwifery units (65 %-42 %, p < 0.001), and in the provision of outpatient postnatal breastfeeding groups (23 %-15 %, p < 0.01) and other postnatal groups (7 %-2 %, p = 0.02). The findings document the ways in which postnatal care provision differs between AMUs and FMU, with potential consequences for choice and experience for women. They are also congruent with evidence that maternity care was adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including a reduction in postnatal visiting for partners and in postnatal group support services.
Sections du résumé
Background
UNASSIGNED
Postnatal care supports healthy transitions to parenthood, mother-infant relationships, and breastfeeding establishment. Highly valued by women and families, it is often an area where parents report low satisfaction compared with other areas of maternity care. Most research about postnatal care is hospital-focused. Little is known about postnatal services provided by midwifery units, and any changes to this provision since the COVID-19 pandemic.
Aim
UNASSIGNED
To describe postnatal care services provided by UK midwifery units and examine the extent to which provision was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods
UNASSIGNED
We carried out a national survey online between January-June 2022 using the United Kingdom Midwifery Study System (UKMidSS). We asked about postnatal care provision in alongside midwifery units (AMU) and freestanding midwifery units (FMU), before the COVID-19 pandemic (July-December 2019) and shortly after restrictions were eased (January-June 2022).
Findings
UNASSIGNED
Overall 131 (67 %) midwifery units responded to the survey, 76 (62 %) AMUs and 55 (75 %) FMUs, from 75 % of eligible NHS organisations. In 2022, 66 % of AMUs reported that women typically stayed for 6-24 h after a straightforward birth, while 70 % of FMUs reported typical postnatal stays of <6 h. For 2019, significantly more FMUs reported providing outpatient postnatal services compared with AMUs (98 % vs 57 %, p < 0.001). From 2019 to 2022 there were significant reductions in partners staying overnight in midwifery units (65 %-42 %, p < 0.001), and in the provision of outpatient postnatal breastfeeding groups (23 %-15 %, p < 0.01) and other postnatal groups (7 %-2 %, p = 0.02).
Conclusions
UNASSIGNED
The findings document the ways in which postnatal care provision differs between AMUs and FMU, with potential consequences for choice and experience for women. They are also congruent with evidence that maternity care was adversely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, including a reduction in postnatal visiting for partners and in postnatal group support services.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38707446
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29878
pii: S2405-8440(24)05909-7
pmc: PMC11066328
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
e29878Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Rachel Rowe reports financial support was provided by National Institute for Health and Care Research. Alessandra Morelli reports financial support was provided by National Institute for Health and Care Research. Rachel Rowe reports a relationship with National Institute for Health and Care Research that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.