Challenges in Administering Salvage Therapy and Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients: A LMIC Real-World Study.

Barriers Inequity Real-world Relapsed/refractory DLBCL Salvage chemotherapy

Journal

Indian journal of hematology & blood transfusion : an official journal of Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion
ISSN: 0971-4502
Titre abrégé: Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus
Pays: India
ID NLM: 9425818

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2024
Historique:
received: 20 05 2023
accepted: 10 08 2023
pmc-release: 01 04 2025
medline: 6 5 2024
pubmed: 6 5 2024
entrez: 6 5 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Standard therapy for patients with Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (RR DLBCL) involves salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant. However, information regarding the number of patients receiving salvage therapy and associated factors is not available from low/middle income countries (LMICs). All patients treated at our center with RR DLBCL from 2016 to 2021 were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses was performed to find factors associated with the lack of receipt of salvage chemotherapy. Eighty-five patients were included in the study. Most patients had primary refractory disease (69.4%). Only 26 patients received standard salvage therapy, while the others (N = 59) received metronomic/palliative oral therapy. On univariate analysis, patients with an annual income below India's Gross National Income per capita (

Identifiants

pubmed: 38708153
doi: 10.1007/s12288-023-01693-8
pii: 1693
pmc: PMC11065853
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

231-236

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Indian Society of Hematology and Blood Transfusion 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflict of interestThe authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Auteurs

Charanpreet Singh (C)

Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Aditya Jandial (A)

Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Arihant Jain (A)

Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Deepesh Lad (D)

Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Alka Khadwal (A)

Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Rajender Basher (R)

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Amanjit Bal (A)

Department of Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Pankaj Malhotra (P)

Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Gaurav Prakash (G)

Department of Clinical Hematology and Medical Oncology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.

Classifications MeSH