Infrared Thermography Shows That a Temperature Difference of 2.2°C (4°F) or Greater Between Corresponding Sites of Neuropathic Feet Does Not Always Lead to a Diabetic Foot Ulcer.

diabetic foot ulcer diabetic foot ulcer prevention infrared thermography neuropathy spot thermometry temperature monitoring

Journal

Journal of diabetes science and technology
ISSN: 1932-2968
Titre abrégé: J Diabetes Sci Technol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101306166

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 6 5 2024
pubmed: 6 5 2024
entrez: 6 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

There is emerging interest in the application of foot temperature monitoring as means of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) prevention. However, the variability in temperature readings of neuropathic feet remains unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term consistency of foot thermograms of diabetic feet at the risk of DFU. A post-hoc analysis of thermal images of 15 participants who remained ulcer-free during a 12-month follow-up were unblinded at the end of the trial. Skin foot temperatures of 12 plantar, 15 dorsal, 3 lateral, and 3 medial regions of interests (ROIs) were derived on monthly thermograms. The temperature differences (∆Ts) of corresponding ROIs of both feet were calculated. Over the 12-month study period, out of the total 2026 plantar data points, 20.3% ROIs were rated as abnormal (absolute ∆T ≥ 2.2°C). There was a significant between-visit variability in the proportion of plantar ROIs with ∆T ≥ 2.2°C (range 7.6%-30.8%, chi-square test, Despite the high rate of hotspots on monthly thermograms, all feet remained intact. This study underscores a significant between-visit inconsistency in thermal images of neuropathic feet which should be considered when planning DFU-prevention programs for self-testing and behavior modification.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
There is emerging interest in the application of foot temperature monitoring as means of diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) prevention. However, the variability in temperature readings of neuropathic feet remains unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term consistency of foot thermograms of diabetic feet at the risk of DFU.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
A post-hoc analysis of thermal images of 15 participants who remained ulcer-free during a 12-month follow-up were unblinded at the end of the trial. Skin foot temperatures of 12 plantar, 15 dorsal, 3 lateral, and 3 medial regions of interests (ROIs) were derived on monthly thermograms. The temperature differences (∆Ts) of corresponding ROIs of both feet were calculated.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
Over the 12-month study period, out of the total 2026 plantar data points, 20.3% ROIs were rated as abnormal (absolute ∆T ≥ 2.2°C). There was a significant between-visit variability in the proportion of plantar ROIs with ∆T ≥ 2.2°C (range 7.6%-30.8%, chi-square test,
CONCLUSIONS UNASSIGNED
Despite the high rate of hotspots on monthly thermograms, all feet remained intact. This study underscores a significant between-visit inconsistency in thermal images of neuropathic feet which should be considered when planning DFU-prevention programs for self-testing and behavior modification.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38708580
doi: 10.1177/19322968241249970
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

19322968241249970

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: P.P. is currently working for Thermetrix Ltd, Abercynon, UK, a company that produces a thermal foot scanner. No potential conflicts of interest relevant to this article were reported by the remaining authors.

Auteurs

Huiling Liew (H)

Diabetic Foot Clinic, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Department of Endocrinology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore.

Wegin Tang (W)

Diabetic Foot Clinic, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

Peter Plassmann (P)

Photometrix Imaging, Pontypridd, UK.

Graham Machin (G)

Temperature and Humidity Group, National Physical Laboratory, London, UK.

Robert Simpson (R)

Temperature and Humidity Group, National Physical Laboratory, London, UK.

Michael E Edmonds (ME)

Diabetic Foot Clinic, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Diabetes and Obesity, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine & Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Nina L Petrova (NL)

Diabetic Foot Clinic, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Diabetes and Obesity, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine & Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Classifications MeSH