Assessment of volume flow rate in arteriovenous fistulas with a novel ultrasound Doppler device (earlybird): Trend analysis, comparison of methods, and inter- and intra-rater reliability.

Doppler Vascular access arteriovenous fistula duplex earlybird hemodialysis kidney failure reliability renal disease surveillance ultrasonography volume flow rate

Journal

The journal of vascular access
ISSN: 1724-6032
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Access
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100940729

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 6 5 2024
pubmed: 6 5 2024
entrez: 6 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

An accessible tool is required to analyze volume flow trends in arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Earlybird, an easy-to-place ultrasound Doppler device, has shown comparable accuracy to duplex ultrasound. In this study, we compared volume flow measurements obtained with duplex ultrasound and the dilution technique to an enhanced earlybird device, featuring a dual Doppler probe system, eliminating the requirement for a known insonation angle. Nine patients with a distal radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula were monitored for 12 months with regular volume flow measurements. Correlation and inter- and intra-class reliability analyses were conducted. An overall moderate correlation was observed between earlybird and duplex ultrasound or dilution technique (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.606 (95% confidence interval 0.064, 0.721) and 0.581 (0.039, 0.739), respectively). Duplex ultrasound compared to dilution measurements, demonstrated an overall moderate correlation (0.725 (0.219, 0.843)). Correlation between earlybird and duplex ultrasound was stronger for the arteriovenous fistula (0.778 (0.016, 0.901)) than the brachial artery (0.381 (-0.062, 0.461)). For earlybird, inter-rater reliability was excellent for the arteriovenous fistula (0.907 (0.423, 0.930)) and poor for the brachial artery (0.430 (0.241, 0.716)). Duplex ultrasound showed a good inter-rater reliability (arteriovenous fistula: 0.843 (0.610, 0.871), brachial artery: 0.819 (0.477, 0.864)). The overall intra-rater reliability was good for duplex ultrasound (rater A: 0.893 (0.727, 0.911); rater B: 0.853 (0.710, 0.891)), while excellent for earlybird (rater A: 0.905 (0.819, 0.928); rater B: 0.921 (0.632, 0.969)). We observed a weaker correlation in the measurements of volume flow rates in arteriovenous fistulas when obtained using earlybird compared to dilution technique, unlike the comparison between duplex ultrasound and the dilution technique. However, inter-rater reliability for the arteriovenous fistula was excellent with earlybird and good with duplex ultrasound, indicating the potential of earlybird as a tool for frequent measurements, enabling trend surveillance and predicting adverse outcomes.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND UNASSIGNED
An accessible tool is required to analyze volume flow trends in arteriovenous fistulas for hemodialysis. Earlybird, an easy-to-place ultrasound Doppler device, has shown comparable accuracy to duplex ultrasound. In this study, we compared volume flow measurements obtained with duplex ultrasound and the dilution technique to an enhanced earlybird device, featuring a dual Doppler probe system, eliminating the requirement for a known insonation angle.
METHODS UNASSIGNED
Nine patients with a distal radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula were monitored for 12 months with regular volume flow measurements. Correlation and inter- and intra-class reliability analyses were conducted.
RESULTS UNASSIGNED
An overall moderate correlation was observed between earlybird and duplex ultrasound or dilution technique (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.606 (95% confidence interval 0.064, 0.721) and 0.581 (0.039, 0.739), respectively). Duplex ultrasound compared to dilution measurements, demonstrated an overall moderate correlation (0.725 (0.219, 0.843)). Correlation between earlybird and duplex ultrasound was stronger for the arteriovenous fistula (0.778 (0.016, 0.901)) than the brachial artery (0.381 (-0.062, 0.461)). For earlybird, inter-rater reliability was excellent for the arteriovenous fistula (0.907 (0.423, 0.930)) and poor for the brachial artery (0.430 (0.241, 0.716)). Duplex ultrasound showed a good inter-rater reliability (arteriovenous fistula: 0.843 (0.610, 0.871), brachial artery: 0.819 (0.477, 0.864)). The overall intra-rater reliability was good for duplex ultrasound (rater A: 0.893 (0.727, 0.911); rater B: 0.853 (0.710, 0.891)), while excellent for earlybird (rater A: 0.905 (0.819, 0.928); rater B: 0.921 (0.632, 0.969)).
CONCLUSION UNASSIGNED
We observed a weaker correlation in the measurements of volume flow rates in arteriovenous fistulas when obtained using earlybird compared to dilution technique, unlike the comparison between duplex ultrasound and the dilution technique. However, inter-rater reliability for the arteriovenous fistula was excellent with earlybird and good with duplex ultrasound, indicating the potential of earlybird as a tool for frequent measurements, enabling trend surveillance and predicting adverse outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38708835
doi: 10.1177/11297298241250379
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

11297298241250379

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Holst-Jæger, Emilie: None. Barstad, Marthe: None. Salvesen, Øyvind: None. Torp, Hans: Inventor and shareholder of CIMON Medical ASSeternes, Arne: None. Pettersen, Erik Mulder: None. CIMON Medical AS was not involved in the study design; collection, analysis, or interpretation of data, manuscript writing, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Auteurs

Emilie Holst-Jæger (E)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Marthe Barstad (M)

Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Øyvind Salvesen (Ø)

Clinical Research Unit, Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Hans Torp (H)

Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
CIMON Medical, NTNU Technology Transfer AS, Trondheim, Norway.

Arne Seternes (A)

Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Trondheim University Hospital, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Research Center for Medical Equipment, Technology and Innovation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.

Erik Mulder Pettersen (EM)

Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Research Center for Medical Equipment, Technology and Innovation, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Surgery, Sørlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.

Classifications MeSH