Unintended Exchange of Target Vessels for Celiac Trunk and Superior Mesenteric Artery Branches in Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair.

branched stent-graft catheterization celiac artery/trunk covered stent-graft custom-made device deployment technique endovascular aneurysm repair off-the-shelf device superior mesenteric artery thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm

Journal

Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists
ISSN: 1545-1550
Titre abrégé: J Endovasc Ther
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100896915

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 May 2024
Historique:
medline: 6 5 2024
pubmed: 6 5 2024
entrez: 6 5 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The treatment of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) using branched endovascular aortic repair (BEVAR) is safe and effective. During deployment, the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) branch can unintentionally open into the celiac trunk (CT) ostium and switched catheterization of the SMA from the CT branch and the CT from the SMA branch can be used as an alternative technique in these cases. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of exchanging the intended target vessels (TVs) for the CT and SMA branches during BEVAR. A single-center retrospective analysis of patients with TAAAs who underwent BEVAR, using off-the-shelf or custom-made devices (CMDs), with an unintended exchange of TVs for the CT and SMA branches was performed. Between 2014 and 2023, 397 patients were treated with BEVAR for TAAA. Eighteen (4.5%) of those patients were treated with an exchange of TVs for the CT and SMA branches. T-branch was used in 9 cases (50%) and the remaining patients were treated with CMDs. Twelve patients were treated electively, 3 were symptomatic and 3 presented with rupture. Of 36 mesenteric TVs in those 18 patients, 34 (94%) were catheterized successfully, including all 18 SMAs and 16 of the 18 CTs. No branch stenosis or occlusion of the switched mesenteric TVs was detected during follow-up. During 30-day follow-up, 3 patients died and during a median follow-up of 3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 1-15) months 3 more patients died. None of the deaths or the 2 unintended reinterventions was induced by the mesenteric TV exchange. The median hospital stay was 14 (IQR: 9-22) days with a median of 4 (IQR: 2-11) days at the intensive care unit. The exchange of the mesenteric TVs for the CT and SMA branches during BEVAR with off-the-shelf and CMD endografts is feasible with good TV patency and freedom from TV-related reinterventions. This alternative technique should be considered in selected cases when direct catheterization via the intended branch is deemed more time-consuming or not feasible. This is the first description of using an exchange of target vessels for the celiac trunk and the superior mesenteric artery branches in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms undergoing BEVAR, using off-the-shelf or custom-made devices. The high success rate as well as the good clinical results without any branch stenosis or occlusion during follow-up highlight the feasibility of this alternative technique. It could help in challenging cases when catheterization of the intended target vessels is not possible or too time consuming, resulting in higher success rates of BEVAR and better clinical results.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38708984
doi: 10.1177/15266028241251985
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

15266028241251985

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Auteurs

Florian K Enzmann (FK)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Alessandro Grandi (A)

German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Giuseppe Panuccio (G)

German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

José Ignacio Torrealba (JI)

German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Michaela Kluckner (M)

Department of Vascular Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.

Petroula Nana (P)

German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Fiona Rohlffs (F)

German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Tilo Kölbel (T)

German Aortic Center Hamburg, Department of Vascular Medicine, University Heart & Vascular Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Classifications MeSH