Workplace Microaggressions: Results of a Survey of the American College of Surgeons Members.
Discrimination
disparity
diversity
gender
harassment
health equity
inclusion
microaggression
microaggressions
professionalism
women in surgery
Journal
American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
ISSN: 1097-6868
Titre abrégé: Am J Obstet Gynecol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0370476
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 May 2024
04 May 2024
Historique:
received:
06
01
2024
revised:
11
04
2024
accepted:
30
04
2024
medline:
7
5
2024
pubmed:
7
5
2024
entrez:
6
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Workplace microaggressions are a longstanding but understudied problem in the surgical specialties. Microaggressions in healthcare are linked to negative emotional and physical health outcomes and can contribute to burnout and suboptimal delivery of patient care. They also negatively impact recruitment, retention and promotion, which often results in attrition. Further attrition at the time of an impending surgical workforce shortage risks compromising delivery of health care to the diverse US population and may jeopardize the financial stability of health care organizations. To date, studies on microaggressions have consisted of small focus groups comprised of women faculty or trainees at a single institution. There are no large, multi-organizational, gender-inclusive studies on microaggressions experienced by practicing surgeons. To examine the demographic and occupational characteristics of surgeons who do and do not report experiencing workplace microaggressions and whether these experiences would influence a decision to pursue a career in surgery again. We developed and internally validated a web-based survey to assess surgeon experiences with microaggressions and associated sequelae. The survey was distributed through a convenience sample of nine American College of Surgeons (ACS) online Communities from November 2022 to January 2023. All ACS Communities comprised members who had completed residency or fellowship training and had experience in the surgical workforce. The survey contained demographic, occupational, and validated microaggression items. Analyses include descriptive and chi-squared statistics, t-tests, and bivariable and multivariable logistic regression. The survey was completed by 377 ACS members with the following characteristics: working as a surgeon (80.9%), non-Hispanic white (71.8%), general surgeons (71.0%), age ≥ 50 years (67.4%), fellowship-trained (61.0%), and women (58.4%). A total of 254 (67.4%) respondents reported experiencing microaggressions. Younger surgeons (p=0.002), women (p<0.001) and fellowship-trained surgeons (p=0.001) were more likely to report experiencing microaggressions than their counterparts. Surgeons working in academic medical centers or healthcare systems with teaching responsibilities were more likely to experience microaggressions than those in private practice (p<0.01). Surgeons currently working as a surgeon or those who are unable to work reported more experience with microaggressions (p=0.003). There was no difference in microaggressions experienced among respondents by surgical specialties, race/ethnicity, or for surgeons with a self-reported disability. In multivariable logistic regression, women had higher odds of experiencing microaggressions than men [aOR 15.9; 95% C.I.: 7.7-32.8] and surgeons in private practice had significantly lower odds of experiencing microaggressions compared to surgeons in academic medicine (aOR 0.3; 95% C.I. 0.1-0.8) or in healthcare systems with teaching responsibilities (aOR 0.2; 95% C.I. 0.1-0.6). Among surgeons responding to an online survey, respondents reporting microaggressions were less likely to say they would choose a career in surgery again (p<0.001). Surgeons reporting experience with microaggressions reflect the diversification of surgical specialties and subspecialties. With continued expansion of surgeon gender and race/ethnicity representation, deliberate efforts to address and eliminate workplace microaggressions could have broad implications for improving recruitment and retention of surgeons.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Workplace microaggressions are a longstanding but understudied problem in the surgical specialties. Microaggressions in healthcare are linked to negative emotional and physical health outcomes and can contribute to burnout and suboptimal delivery of patient care. They also negatively impact recruitment, retention and promotion, which often results in attrition. Further attrition at the time of an impending surgical workforce shortage risks compromising delivery of health care to the diverse US population and may jeopardize the financial stability of health care organizations. To date, studies on microaggressions have consisted of small focus groups comprised of women faculty or trainees at a single institution. There are no large, multi-organizational, gender-inclusive studies on microaggressions experienced by practicing surgeons.
OBJECTIVE(S)
OBJECTIVE
To examine the demographic and occupational characteristics of surgeons who do and do not report experiencing workplace microaggressions and whether these experiences would influence a decision to pursue a career in surgery again.
STUDY DESIGN
METHODS
We developed and internally validated a web-based survey to assess surgeon experiences with microaggressions and associated sequelae. The survey was distributed through a convenience sample of nine American College of Surgeons (ACS) online Communities from November 2022 to January 2023. All ACS Communities comprised members who had completed residency or fellowship training and had experience in the surgical workforce. The survey contained demographic, occupational, and validated microaggression items. Analyses include descriptive and chi-squared statistics, t-tests, and bivariable and multivariable logistic regression.
RESULTS
RESULTS
The survey was completed by 377 ACS members with the following characteristics: working as a surgeon (80.9%), non-Hispanic white (71.8%), general surgeons (71.0%), age ≥ 50 years (67.4%), fellowship-trained (61.0%), and women (58.4%). A total of 254 (67.4%) respondents reported experiencing microaggressions. Younger surgeons (p=0.002), women (p<0.001) and fellowship-trained surgeons (p=0.001) were more likely to report experiencing microaggressions than their counterparts. Surgeons working in academic medical centers or healthcare systems with teaching responsibilities were more likely to experience microaggressions than those in private practice (p<0.01). Surgeons currently working as a surgeon or those who are unable to work reported more experience with microaggressions (p=0.003). There was no difference in microaggressions experienced among respondents by surgical specialties, race/ethnicity, or for surgeons with a self-reported disability. In multivariable logistic regression, women had higher odds of experiencing microaggressions than men [aOR 15.9; 95% C.I.: 7.7-32.8] and surgeons in private practice had significantly lower odds of experiencing microaggressions compared to surgeons in academic medicine (aOR 0.3; 95% C.I. 0.1-0.8) or in healthcare systems with teaching responsibilities (aOR 0.2; 95% C.I. 0.1-0.6). Among surgeons responding to an online survey, respondents reporting microaggressions were less likely to say they would choose a career in surgery again (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Surgeons reporting experience with microaggressions reflect the diversification of surgical specialties and subspecialties. With continued expansion of surgeon gender and race/ethnicity representation, deliberate efforts to address and eliminate workplace microaggressions could have broad implications for improving recruitment and retention of surgeons.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38710272
pii: S0002-9378(24)00570-2
doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.044
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.