Performance Comparison of Augmented Reality Versus Ultrasound Guidance for Puncture: A Phantom Study.
Augmented reality
Image-guided therapy
Interventional radiology
Percutaneous procedure
Journal
Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
ISSN: 1432-086X
Titre abrégé: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8003538
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 May 2024
06 May 2024
Historique:
received:
09
11
2023
accepted:
02
04
2024
medline:
7
5
2024
pubmed:
7
5
2024
entrez:
6
5
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Augmented reality (AR) is an innovative approach that could assist percutaneous procedures; by directly seeing "through" a phantom, targeting a lesion might be more intuitive than using ultrasound (US). The objective of this study was to compare the performance of experienced interventional radiologists and operators untrained in soft tissue lesion puncture using AR guidance and standard US guidance. Three trained interventional radiologists with 5-10 years of experience and three untrained operators performed punctures of five targets in an abdominal phantom, with US guidance and AR guidance. Correct targeting, accuracy (defined as the Euclidean distance between the tip and the center of the target), planning time, and puncture time were documented. Accuracy was higher for the trained group than the untrained group using US guidance (1 mm versus 4 mm, p = 0.001), but not when using AR guidance (4 mm vs. 4 mm, p = 0.76). All operators combined, no significant difference was found concerning accuracy between US and AR guidance (2 mm vs. 4 mm, p = 0.09), but planning time and puncture time were significantly shorter using AR (respectively, 15.1 s vs. 74 s, p < 0.001; 16.1 s vs. 59 s; p < 0.001). Untrained and trained operators obtained comparable accuracy in percutaneous punctures when using AR guidance whereas US performance was better in the experienced group. All operators together, accuracy was similar between US and AR guidance, but shorter planning time, puncture time were found for AR guidance.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38710797
doi: 10.1007/s00270-024-03727-8
pii: 10.1007/s00270-024-03727-8
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE).
Références
Alexander LF, McComb BL, Bowman AW, Bonnett SL, Ghazanfari SM, Caserta MP. Ultrasound simulation training for radiology residents—curriculum design and implementation. J Ultrasound Med. 2023;42:777–90. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.16098 .
doi: 10.1002/jum.16098
pubmed: 36106721
Fatima H, Mahmood F, Mufarrih SH, Mitchell JD, Wong V, Amir R, et al. Preclinical proficiency-based model of ultrasound training. Anesth Analg. 2022;134:178–87. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005510 .
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005510
pubmed: 33844654
Rankin JH, Elkhunovich MA, Rangarajan V, Chilstrom M, Mailhot T. Learning curves for ultrasound assessment of lumbar puncture insertion sites: when is competency established? J Emerg Med. 2016;51:55–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.03.025 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.03.025
pubmed: 27231207
Härle P, Bester J, Hillebrand M, Hartung W. Ultrasound-guided puncture: an inexpensive and effective learning model. Z Rheumatol. 2011;70:525–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00393-011-0839-x .
doi: 10.1007/s00393-011-0839-x
pubmed: 21863471
Liu Y, Glass NL, Glover CD, Power RW, Watcha MF. Comparison of the development of performance skills in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia simulations with different phantom models. Simul Healthc. 2013;8:368–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0b013e318299dae2 .
doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e318299dae2
pubmed: 24096912
Dabadie A, Soussan J, Mancini J, Vidal V, Bartoli JM, Gorincour G, et al. Development and initial evaluation of a training program for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement for radiology residents and technicians. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016;97:877–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2015.11.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2015.11.014
pubmed: 27150063
De Fiori E, Rampinelli C, Turco F, Bonello L, Bellomi M. Role of operator experience in ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of the thyroid. Radiol Med. 2010;115:612–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-010-0528-x .
doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0528-x
pubmed: 20177981
Zammit C, Calleja-Agius J, Azzopardi E. Augmented reality for teaching anatomy. Clin Anat. 2022;35:824–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23920 .
doi: 10.1002/ca.23920
pubmed: 35657719
Barral M, Razakamanantsoa L, Cornelis FH. How to further train medical students in Interventional radiology? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2021;102:9–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2020.11.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.11.014
pubmed: 33303393
Shuhaiber JH. Augmented reality in surgery. Arch Surg. 2004;139:170–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.139.2.170 .
doi: 10.1001/archsurg.139.2.170
pubmed: 14769575
Verhey JT, Haglin JM, Verhey EM, Hartigan DE. Virtual, augmented, and mixed reality applications in orthopedic surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2020;16:e2067. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2067 .
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2067
pubmed: 31867864
Park BJ, Hunt SJ, Martin C, Nadolski GJ, Wood BJ, Gade TP. Augmented and Mixed reality: technologies for enhancing the future of IR. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31:1074–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2019.09.020 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2019.09.020
pubmed: 32061520
pmcid: 7311237
Sparwasser P, Haack M, Epple S, Frey L, Zeymer S, Dotzauer R, et al. Smartglass augmented reality-assisted targeted prostate biopsy using cognitive point-of-care fusion technology. Int J Med Robot. 2022;18:e2366. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2366 .
doi: 10.1002/rcs.2366
pubmed: 35034415
Pfefferle M, Shahub S, Shahedi M, Gahan J, Johnson B, Le P, et al. Renal biopsy under augmented reality guidance. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2020;11315:113152W. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2550593 .
doi: 10.1117/12.2550593
pubmed: 32476704
pmcid: 7261605
Costa N, Ferreira L, de Araújo ARVF, Oliveira B, Torres HR, Morais P, et al. Augmented reality-assisted ultrasound breast biopsy. Sensors (Basel). 2023;23:1838. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23041838 .
doi: 10.3390/s23041838
pubmed: 36850436
Fritz J, Paweena U, Ungi T, Flammang AJ, McCarthy EF, Fichtinger G, et al. Augmented reality visualization using image overlay technology for MR-guided interventions: cadaveric bone biopsy at 1.5 T. Invest Radiol. 2013;48:464–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827b9f86 .
doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827b9f86
pubmed: 23328911
Gadodia G, Yanof J, Hanlon A, Bustos S, Weunski C, West K, et al. Early clinical feasibility evaluation of an augmented reality platform for guidance and navigation during percutaneous tumor ablation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2022;33:333–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2021.11.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2021.11.014
pubmed: 35221048
Nicolau SA, Pennec X, Soler L, Buy X, Gangi A, Ayache N, et al. An augmented reality system for liver thermal ablation: design and evaluation on clinical cases. Med Image Anal. 2009;13:494–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2009.02.003 .
doi: 10.1016/j.media.2009.02.003
pubmed: 19282234
Solbiati M, Ierace T, Muglia R, Pedicini V, Iezzi R, Passera KM, et al. Thermal ablation of liver tumors guided by augmented reality: an initial clinical experience. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14:1312. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14051312 .
doi: 10.3390/cancers14051312
pubmed: 35267620
Yang J, Zhu J, Sze DY, Cui L, Li X, Bai Y, et al. Feasibility of augmented reality-guided transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31:2098–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2020.07.025 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2020.07.025
pubmed: 33261744
Li M, Seifabadi R, Long D, De Ruiter Q, Varble N, Hecht R, et al. Smartphone- versus smartglasses-based augmented reality (AR) for percutaneous needle interventions: system accuracy and feasibility study. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020;15:1921–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02235-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s11548-020-02235-7
pubmed: 32734314
pmcid: 8985545
Long DJ, Li M, De Ruiter QMB, Hecht R, Li X, Varble N, et al. Comparison of smartphone augmented reality, smartglasses augmented reality, and 3D CBCT-guided fluoroscopy navigation for percutaneous needle insertion: a phantom study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021;44:774–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02760-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s00270-020-02760-7
pubmed: 33409547
Fedorov A, Beichel R, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Finet J, Fillion-Robin J-C, Pujol S, et al. 3D Slicer as an image computing platform for the quantitative imaging network. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30:1323–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2012.05.001
pubmed: 22770690
pmcid: 3466397
Barat M, Jannot A-S, Dohan A, Soyer P. How to report and compare quantitative variables in a radiology article. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2022;103:571–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2022.09.007 .
doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2022.09.007
pubmed: 36280585
Schullian P, Laimer G, Johnston E, Putzer D, Eberle G, Widmann G, et al. Reliability of stereotactic radiofrequency ablation (SRFA) for malignant liver tumors: novice versus experienced operators. Biology (Basel). 2023;12:175. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology12020175 .
doi: 10.3390/biology12020175
pubmed: 36829454
Uppot RN, Laguna B, McCarthy CJ, De Novi G, Phelps A, Siegel E, et al. Implementing virtual and augmented reality tools for radiology education and training, communication, and clinical care. Radiology. 2019;291:570–80. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182210 .
doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019182210
pubmed: 30990383
Barsom EZ, Graafland M, Schijven MP. Systematic review on the effectiveness of augmented reality applications in medical training. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:4174–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4800-6
pubmed: 26905573
pmcid: 5009168
Kim Y, Kim H, Kim YO. Virtual reality and augmented reality in plastic surgery: a review. Arch Plast Surg. 2017;44:179–87. https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.179 .
doi: 10.5999/aps.2017.44.3.179
pubmed: 28573091
pmcid: 5447526
Buchs NC, Volonte F, Pugin F, Toso C, Fusaglia M, Gavaghan K, et al. Augmented environments for the targeting of hepatic lesions during image-guided robotic liver surgery. J Surg Res. 2013;184:825–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.032 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2013.04.032
pubmed: 23684617
Perkins SL, Lin MA, Srinivasan S, Wheeler AJ, Hargreaves BA, Daniel BL (2017) A mixed-reality system for breast surgical planning. In: 2017 IEEE International symposium on mixed and augmented reality (ISMAR-Adjunct), pp. 269–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2017.92
Mohammed MAA, Khalaf MH, Kesselman A, Wang DS, Kothary N. A role for virtual reality in planning endovascular procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29:971–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2018.02.018 .
doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.02.018
pubmed: 29935787
Solbiati LA. Augmented reality: thrilling future for interventional oncology? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2021;44:782–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02801-9 .
doi: 10.1007/s00270-021-02801-9
pubmed: 33709274
Farshad-Amacker NA, Kubik-Huch RA, Kolling C, Leo C, Goldhahn J. Learning how to perform ultrasound-guided interventions with and without augmented reality visualization: a randomized study. Eur Radiol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-022-09220-5 .
doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-09220-5
pubmed: 36350392
pmcid: 10017581
Mahmood F, Mahmood E, Dorfman RG, Mitchell J, Mahmood F-U, Jones SB, et al. Augmented reality and ultrasound education: initial experience. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018;32:1363–7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2017.12.006 .
doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2017.12.006
pubmed: 29452879
Chalhoub J, Ayer SK, Ariaratnam ST. Augmented reality for enabling un and under trained individuals to complete specialty construction tasks. J Inf Technol Constr (ITcon). 2021. https://doi.org/10.36680/j.itcon.2021.008 .
doi: 10.36680/j.itcon.2021.008
Hiranaka T, Fujishiro T, Hida Y, Shibata Y, Tsubosaka M, Nakanishi Y, et al. Augmented reality: the use of the PicoLinker smart glasses improves wire insertion under fluoroscopy. World J Orthop. 2017;8:891–4. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v8.i12.891 .
doi: 10.5312/wjo.v8.i12.891
pubmed: 29312847
pmcid: 5745431
Ghaednia H, Fourman MS, Lans A, Detels K, Dijkstra H, Lloyd S, et al. Augmented and virtual reality in spine surgery, current applications and future potentials. Spine J. 2021;21:1617–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.018 .
doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2021.03.018
pubmed: 33774210